The Official EF Discussion Thread
Yea you should be fine. I think people lube the ES often to prevent premature wear/binding, so just keep an eye on them.
Mugen RTA Bushings
http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-262...piece-set.aspx
Hardrace RTA Bushings
http://www.specialprojectsms.com/ind...?productID=121
You will save about ~$65 going with Hardrace and they are just as good as the Mugen parts.
Mugen RTA Bushings
http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-262...piece-set.aspx
Hardrace RTA Bushings
http://www.specialprojectsms.com/ind...?productID=121
You will save about ~$65 going with Hardrace and they are just as good as the Mugen parts.
Will buy!
Tai I did the RTA Sebring HPDE, would of been better going off to a Nasa event. Either way my oil pump let go at the end of my first session and the bottom end chewed itself up.
We need measurements. I know Wes took measurements for the DA and crx si arms (which showed about a 5mm difference each side). I remember a friend using 95 ex rear disc on his 89 hatch and it too 'appeared' to affect wheel fitment, much like the DA arms. We did not get around to measuring them. So for me, just to be on the safe side, I chose to use the crx si arms. Afterall, they were specifically designed for the EF chassis.
Yea you should be fine. I think people lube the ES often to prevent premature wear/binding, so just keep an eye on them.
Mugen RTA Bushings
http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-262...piece-set.aspx
Hardrace RTA Bushings
http://www.specialprojectsms.com/ind...?productID=121
You will save about ~$65 going with Hardrace and they are just as good as the Mugen parts.
Mugen RTA Bushings
http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-262...piece-set.aspx
Hardrace RTA Bushings
http://www.specialprojectsms.com/ind...?productID=121
You will save about ~$65 going with Hardrace and they are just as good as the Mugen parts.
only RTA bushing that was of different size was the 90-93 Integra, 88-00 civics, and 94-01 Integras both used the same RTA bushings
I had originally put my Mugen bushings in DC RTA's and then sold the RTA without the bushings and put them into my EF RTA. Fit without issues in both arms.
http://www.jhpusa.com/store/pc/viewP...idproduct=4323
What does it matter? 89+ crx rear suspension is identical to the hatchback, only difference is disc equipped or not, which has no effect on anything but braking (some will even argue this, lol) and a slight weight difference. Do I have this wrong?
Every now and then we tend to get into great discussion and debates about part interchangeability/ hybrid stuff. There is TONS of great info in this thread... Good luck finding it all though 
I swear we had a great brake discussion around page 600 or 800 something...wish I bookmarked that ****.

I swear we had a great brake discussion around page 600 or 800 something...wish I bookmarked that ****.
I'm only at page 550.... 
Either way, right now I have 92-95 EX rear trailing arms on my car, only issue I have is toe problems which is a result of not pressing my prothane bushings on all the way...

Either way, right now I have 92-95 EX rear trailing arms on my car, only issue I have is toe problems which is a result of not pressing my prothane bushings on all the way...
Every now and then we tend to get into great discussion and debates about part interchangeability/ hybrid stuff. There is TONS of great info in this thread... Good luck finding it all though 
I swear we had a great brake discussion around page 600 or 800 something...wish I bookmarked that ****.

I swear we had a great brake discussion around page 600 or 800 something...wish I bookmarked that ****.
Wow that blows. Not good seat time or what? If my car is running, I'm going to be doing a NASA event later this year.


