Thanks,there 10k but ill be saving up for some 4k.

 

What's up everyone? For my peeps in Cali what the hell is up with the rain...Damn! 5 days straight.....slow and low that is the tempo... when driving anywhere in this weather lol ...well I got pulled over by po-po yesterday and the rookie said he pulled me over for having a modified exhaust..which we all know is BS!! the bastard wouldn't even pull out a Db tester to see that I am within state compliance. what a Bish! and what gets me more irritated I was pulled over in front of my work place in an industrial area where sounds echo, so yea my exhaust sounds louder than it really is. I was going the speed limit which is 40 mph. well there's my venting for the day. WOOOSAAHH......WOOOSAAAH.....

 

Tell me about it, my basement semi flooded since its lower than outside. I actually have a little time yesterday to try to put on my sway bar, and instead I striped a bolt so I had to put it back together so I can get another bolt before taking it off. It was pathetic.

 

im pretty sure that in California it doesnt matter how loud the exhaust is, the ticket is for "modified exhaust" so if you have a big *** muffler on your car, even if theres no sound coming from it at all, you can still get a ticket for it

 

Check it out this is what i found out..

CHP Exhaust

In response to complaints from SEMA and aftermarket exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations for use by all interested parties. The new guidelines make clear that aftermarket exhaust modifications do not in and of themselves violate muffler noise regulations unless the modifications result in noise levels exceeding California's 95-decibel limit.

SEMA and CHP have agreed to educate police officers, consumers and the industry to ensure a clear understanding of the proper exhaust noise limits and enforcement standards. SEMA's goal is to reduce improper citations and encourage modifications that comply with the regulations. It is the responsibility of aftermarket manufacturers to design and test products to ensure they comply with the regulation. We recommend that manufacturers distribute compliance information about their products and the enclosed SEMA summaries to educate consumers about their rights and responsibilities under California's regulations. Feel free to copy and distribute the enclosed materials.

In the coming months, we will compile information on enforcement actions brought to our attention. We urge you to report to us any experiences your customers have with unfair citations. We are hopeful that the guidelines will inform police officers about proper enforcement standards and procedures; if the guidelines prove ineffective in practice, we will undertake other measurers to seek fair enforcement of the regulations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, email stevemac@sema.org.
Top

CHP Exhaust Noise Guidelines at a Glance

Responding to complaints from SEMA and custom exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued a new bulletin clarifying state exhaust noise regulations. The Bulletin (CHP Information Bulletin 98-100) contains the following information:

Contrary to some citations issued recently, exhaust modifications that increase noise are not automatically illegal in California. The regulations allow exhaust modifications increasing noise up to 95 decibels. The California Vehicle Code does not prohibit exhaust modifications, modified tailpipes or muffler tips which increase exhaust noise levels over that of factory-installed systems as long as noise levels do not exceed the 95-decibel limit. Because California does not provide for practical roadside testing, enforcement stops will continue to require an officer's informed evaluation. CHP advises officers to issue "Notice to Correct" (fix-it tickets) when vehicles are judged in violation of the noise standard. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to nullify the citation by presenting materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95-decibel standard. Although CHP lacks resources to verify manufacturer claims, it is aware that many custom exhausxt systems meet the 95-decibel standard. The bulletin advises that police officers consider specialty equipment documentation when evaluating exhaust systems for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket. California exhaust noise regulations apply statewide, prohibiting local authorities from adopting local noise limitations that differ from the state regulation. Citations issued under differing local ordinances are invalid.
For additional information, email stevemac@sema.org.
Top

Exhaust Noise Standard

CHP Information Bulletin: An Exhaust Noise Standard to Guide Enforcement Offices, Specialty Equipment Manufacturers and Consumers

The California Highway Patrol (CHP), working with manufacturers and the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations. CHP Information Bulletin No. 98-100 informs CHP and local officers, industry and consumers on applicable noise limits and allowable custom exhaust modifications.

Where To Find It: The following indicates the paragraph # (e.g., Q2) in the CHP Bulletin containing key information to support specialty equipment manufacturers and consumers on legal exhaust modifications.

The Bulletin acknowledges that exhaust modifications that increase noise may be legal under California regulations and that exhaust systems which meet a 95-decibel noise limit (13 CCR 1036(d)(1)), are deemed to comply with California's modified exhaust enforcement provisions (Vehicle Code Sections 27150 and 27151). [Q2 & Q10]. The document also advises that the California Vehicle Code does not automatically prohibit modifications that increase exhaust system noise levels over that of factory-installed systems. [Q2].

Industry representatives and the CHP have pledged to educate interested parties about California's applicable noise limits and proper enforcement standards. Because current regulations do not provide for practical roadside noise testing, enforcement stops will require an officer's informed, professional evaluation. [Q2]. The Bulletin notes that CHP lacks resources to independently verify manufacturer claims, but is aware there are custom systems that meet the noise levels specified in 1036(d)(1), CCR 13. An officer may consider specialty equipment manufacturer documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket pursuant to a "Notice to Correct" citation (Vehicle Code Section 40610(b)). [Q13].

The following summarizes the Bulletin's guidelines with regard to custom exhaust systems and enforcement of California's noise regulations:

Exhaust Noise Limits: California regulations contain a number of sections specifying permissible vehicle noise levels. The Bulletin advises that passenger car exhaust systems [Q9] that comply with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR are deemed to comply with Vehicle Code enforcement Sections 27150 and 27151, governing mufflers and exhaust system modifications. [Q10]. The exhaust noise provisions in 1036(d)(1) establish a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, at a specified speed typically between 3000 and 5000 rpm (see regulations for details). [Q9]. Exhaust system modifications are permitted to increase noise above the level of original factory installed systems as long as the 95-decibel limit is not exceeded. [Q10].

Statewide Noise Standard: The Bulletin advises that Section 21 of the Vehicle Code makes the Code applicable and uniform throughout the state, prohibiting local authorities from adopting additional noise limitations, unless expressly authorized. Citations issued under any such local ordinances are therefore invalid. [Q12]. Modified Exhaust Systems: A custom, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip does not automatically constitute a violation of Vehicle Code Section 27151. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels. [Q4]. There are no regulations that require configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle which does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151. [Q4].

"Fix-it" Ticket: Concerning enforcement action on excessive noise, the Bulletin recommends using CHP 281 "Notice to Correct" or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)" unless disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present. [Q14]. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to present materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95dB(A) standard and seek to have the citation nullified.
Top

CHP Information Bulletin No. 98-100

Excessive Noise Enforcement Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks and Motorcycles

The California Highway Patrol (CHP), Commercial Vehicle Section (CVS), has received many inquiries about excessive noise emitted by passenger vehicles, light trucks and motorcycles. Enforcement personnel and the public have inquired regarding enforcement of the Vehicle Code (VC) sections pertaining to excessive noise emitted by these vehicles.

Excessive noise is primarily a nuisance issue rather than a safety concern, and determination of excessive noise is subjective. For this reason, enforcement personnel are to exercise sound professional judgment in making a determination of violation. The following guidelines and attached question and answer sheet (Attachment A) provide guidance to enforcement personnel regarding appropriate enforcement procedures.

Enforcement Guidelines

The only drivers who should be cited are those whose vehicles:

1. Are not equipped with a muffler;
2. Clearly emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, or;
3. Have a clearly defective exhaust system (holes, leaks, etc.).

Clearing Citations

When clearing excessive noise citations issued by the CHP or allied agencies, personnel are to consider exhaust systems in compliance if they incorporate a reasonably effective muffler, do not emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, and appear to be in good repair. ATTACHMENT A

Q1: Doesn't the VC require a muffler on every vehicle?

Yes. Section 27150 VC requires that every motor vehicle subject to registration be equipped with an adequate muffler. There are no exceptions — all vehicles must be equipped with a muffler, as defined in Section 425 VC. A turbocharger is not considered a muffler.

Q2: Aren't all exhaust system modifications prohibited?

No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of the exhaust system to amplify or increase the noise emitted by the vehicle, making the vehicle not in compliance with Section 27150 VC or exceeding the noise limits established in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Section 27151 VC does not prohibit all modifications to an exhaust system. It also does not prohibit all modifications that increase the noise level of the exhaust system over that of the original, factory-installed exhaust system (as it did until 1980). It only prohibits modifications that result in a noise level higher than those specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Accurately determining compliance with Sections 27201-27206 VC for enforcement purposes is generally impractical. Enforcement personnel must make an informed professional evaluation to determine if excessive noise statutes are being violated.
Q3: Do I have to actually listen to a vehicle to cite it for a violation of either Section 27150 or 27151?

Yes. Drivers of vehicles should not be cited for violation of either Section 27150 or 27151 VC unless the officer has personally listened to the vehicle in operation. This can be either under actual driving conditions or with the vehicle stationary and the engine running. Even if the officer has inspected the exhaust system and does not see a muffler present, the officer should listen to the vehicle. The purpose of this is to be sure that the exhaust system does not incorporate internally baffled pipes or other components that meet the definition of a muffler. There are no specifications which state required configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle that does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.

Q4: Does an aftermarket, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip constitute a violation of Section 27151 VC?

No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of exhaust systems to amplify or increase noise. The officer would have to establish that the modification increased the noise emitted by the vehicle by listening to the exhaust. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels.
Q5: Since Section 27150 requires that the muffler prevent excessive and unusual noise, can the driver of a vehicle be cited for violation of Section 27150 if it emits a sound different than the original factory installed muffler?

No. The prohibition against unusual noise refers to noises that are unusual for motor vehicles. Noise that may be unusual for a particular make or model of vehicle, but which is not necessarily unusual for other motor vehicles, should not be considered in violation, provided the noise is not excessive.

Q6: Aren't all modified exhaust systems unlawful under pollution control laws?

No. Current pollution control laws regarding aftermarket exhaust systems are quite complex, but do permit the installation of a variety of aftermarket and "exempt" systems. Due to the complexity of modern pollution control systems and the laws governing them, the CHP does not provide technical training in this area. Enforcement of pollution control laws is the responsibility of the Bureau of Automotive Repair through the "Smog Check" program.
Q7: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC? Can these be used to cite loud vehicles?

No. Section 27200 VC prohibits the sale of new motor vehicles that exceed the noise limits specified in these Sections. The specified noise limits (80 dB(A) (decibels) for all new cars, pickup trucks, vans and motorcycles apply only to new motor vehicles, under full throttle acceleration tests, measured 50 feet from the test vehicle, as specified in Sections 1040-1044, 1046 and 1047, Title 13, California Code of Regulations (13 CCR). These noise levels and the specified test methods apply to manufacturers and new car dealers only, for new vehicle certification purposes, and may not be used for enforcement purposes against vehicles being operated on public roadways. The CHP is not aware of any significant violation of Section 27200 VC by vehicle manufacturers or dealers.

Q8: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC and how can they be enforced?

Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC specify noise standards for vehicles operating on the highway (in-use vehicles), and are intended for use in actual traffic conditions. The limits of Section 23130 apply under all conditions of grade, load, acceleration and deceleration. The lower limits of Section 23130.5 apply only to relatively level roadways and under conditions of relatively constant speed. They specifically do not apply to areas of congested traffic that require noticeable acceleration or deceleration, or within 200 feet of an official traffic control device or change in grade. Although these sections were intended for use in actual traffic conditions, the complexities of noise testing require the testing be conducted in a relatively large open area free of other vehicles and large sound-reflecting objects. This makes in-use vehicle noise testing in most developed areas impractical, where noise complaints are most likely to occur. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct vehicle noise testing. Enforcement using Section 27150 or 27151 VC is usually more appropriate and effective.
Q9: What is the exhaust noise test specified in 13 CCR? Can this be used for enforcement?

Sections 1030-1036, 13 CCR, were intended to be used by Licensed Muffler Certification Stations as a means of determining if an exhaust system met the requirements of the Muffler Certification Program (when those programs were operational). They specify testing procedures for motor vehicle exhaust noise alone (as opposed to total vehicle noise). This procedure specifies a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, typically at a speed of 3000-5000 rpm. (For comparison, a modern rotary lawn mower with a 5-horsepower Briggs & Stratton engine typically emits approximately 93 dB(A) at the same distance at full speed under no load.) It applies only to passenger vehicles. It does not apply to motorcycles or to vehicles over 6000 pounds gross weight.

Q10: Can this test be used in enforcement?

Not readily. Although much simpler than the test methods specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC, this test method still requires some technical expertise and a means to determine both the speed (rpm) of the engine under test (tachometer) and the rpm at which maximum horsepower of the engine is developed (information which may not always be readily available), as well as a sound level meter. It is not intended for roadside noise testing. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct exhaust noise testing. This test is useful, however, for determining if an aftermarket or performance exhaust system complies with VC requirements. It should be noted that the 95 dB(A) level, because it is intended as a simple "go-no-go" type of test, may permit exhaust noise somewhat higher than those permitted under Sections 27201-27206 VC. An exhaust system that complies with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR, is deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.

Q11: What happened to the Muffler Certification and the Licensed Muffler Certification Station Programs?

Funding for both programs was terminated in 1979. There are currently no Official Muffler Certification Stations, no listing of certified mufflers and no formal mechanism in place to conduct objective vehicle or exhaust noise testing.

Q12: Can local authorities enact or enforce more strict ordinances regarding vehicle noise?

No. Section 21 VC makes the VC applicable and uniform throughout the state, and prohibits local authorities from enacting or enforcing any ordinance on the matters covered by the VC unless expressly authorized to do so. In-use vehicle noise is addressed in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC. There is no provision in the VC that permits local authorities to adopt additional noise limitations. Consequently, citations issued under such ordinances are invalid.

Q13: Some aftermarket exhaust systems include documentation that the system has been tested and found to meet the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. Are those legal?

The CHP does not have the resources to independently verify manufacturer's claims, but is aware that some aftermarket exhaust systems do meet the noise levels specified in Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. An officer may consider such documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during the issuance of a citation and when clearing a citation pursuant to Section 40610(b) VC.

Q14: What type of enforcement action should be taken against vehicles emitting excessive noise?

Providing none of the disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present, the use of the CHP 281, "Notice to Correct," or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on the CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)," would be appropriate for these violations.

It is NOT illegal to modify your exhaust in the state of California as long as it meets noise level guidelines of 95Db. I am gonna buy me a Db meter and keep it with me if they ever pull me over for this crap again. I will ask the officer if he would like some ICE for that burn lol

 

That sux. I won't be able to do any upgrades to my ride until the new year, I really want to get my vtec head on,but also debating on maybe getting a turbo I don't know yet.

 

yeah that post is way too long, im not going to read that lol

 

lmao

 

Hay guys,well Ill be off the court today to fight a speeding ticket (i hope). I know ill end up paying something,but lets hope the judge has a hart seance its X-Mas in 2 days.
And no,i was not speeding. I was going 45 in a 45 and there was this ugly *** car that sped up right behind me. He just about hit me but cut across all 3 lanes. The cop did say he didn't see me speeding but his radar went off and he looked up and only seen my car.
He ended up stopping me 2 miles down the street by my house,i thought he was on a call and was moving out of his way tell i seen him still getting behind me. What an *** crack.

 

Well I'm back from court. The ticket was 112 bucks not including the fees and what not. But what was nice about Nevada court is that i didn't have to see the judge,i talked to the DA and he changed the speeding ticket to a parking ticket. All i had to pay him was 52 bucks..lol. Not point on my DL or anything. That ticket would of been around 400 bucks if i seen the judge.

 

hey guys...it's been a while...too much **** goin on. hows errybody though?

 

Well I just went thru 69 pages seem pretty cool but I WANT TO SEE MORE PICS lol heres one of mine lol

 

so its offical.. i didnt get the job.. stupid driving records..

 

What part of RI? Your car looks familiar but then again everyone and their mother owns an accord in ri

 

What happen to the skirts? Other then that,looks much better. Got a shot of the inside? And what all did you do and whats next on the list?

 

Did this a day ago,couldn't use the wires cause the plastic kept melting,so i ran some LEDs in front to light them up seance the LEDs in back didn't shine though them.

 

It never had skirts on it but it is getting them put on..........I have many interior pics did not want to over flow the thread..................b16 will be built an engine bay redone an redo the lights hids i think an rewire the whole car when it is nice weather............an then sale it if i get close to my asking price

 

Dude,post up more pics man. To many pics is never enough,you wont over flow the thread.

 

 

i'm in EG for a few months a year cuz i go to school in ny. where you at?

this will prolly make it a little more familiar:

 

 

 

Dam hella slap why u gonna sell it

 

sorry to hear that bro. That's complete BS. Something better will come along.

 

interior
recaro evo seats
jdm white face cluster and regular usdm eg si cluster
jdm coin pocket
jdm clock
seat belt harness i dont kno the name by hart
sir steering wheel
jdm arm rest

exterior
15 in sprint harts
oem front lip
black housing citylights
amber coners
50/50 tail lights
carbon fiber wing clear is fading though
spoon mirrors
8k hid

suspension
skunk2 camber kit front n back
tein flex full suspension
green beaks lower tie bar
traction bar

wheels
15x7 sprint hart cp custom green.
195/50 kumhos

engine
98 gsr head
ferrea flat racing valves
crower springs and retainers
type r cams
3angle valve job
port n polish
skunk2 manifold
aem fuel rail
skunk2 cam gears
550 precision injectors

97 ls block
stock internals
block gard
arp head studs
cosmetic head gasket
golden eagle ls-vtec kit

exedy clutch kit
act 8pound flywheel

JDM B16 tranny
wit phantom grip lsd

innovated motor mounts
wire tuck
battery relocated in the back

turbo
jdm blocks manifold
airesearch turbo
ac compatable ac compatable all the ac stuff will come with the car. you can put it back if you wish.
greddy knock off blow of valve
turborev wastegate



before pics.


no longer with these doors.



during.



after.