Need help building a monster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 01:08 AM
  #1  
gsr173's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Lake Havasu, Az, USA
Default Need help building a monster

I'm building a b18c1 for Turbo, I don't know what valves, springs retainers ect...
or turbo to get for a goal 500whp+ build. I have a dart sleeved block bored out to 83.5 with ARP studs. I think i'm going with a wiseco 9:1 pistons , eagle rods and stock crank. Fuel options in town are 93,100 & 105

This is my first big build, I wanna do it right, so any help, suggestions would be appreciated.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 05:59 AM
  #2  
atec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Norway
Default Re: Need help building a monster (gsr173)

Simple supertech valvetrain, get it bored/honed to 84mm with either Wiseco or CP pistons(9:1)
B18a/b crank (LS)
manley rods
1000cc injectors
walbro 255lph
Competition clutch stage 4
thermal 3" exhaust
Full-race stage 2 kit either GT 3076R or the cheaper t3:t60-1 .82a/r
Hondata s300/neptune RTP and a good tuner like Tony (T1) or Jeff Evans.
105octane with over 450whp.(The tuners will advice you on this subject)
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 06:12 AM
  #3  
gitwidit's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 6
From: Traverse City, MI
Default Re: Need help building a monster (atec)

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #4  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

If you're shooting for 500whp at the most, follow Atec's advice. Another turbo option that you may choose to investigate is the Borg Warner line-up. I bought my new S256 from Turbodano and can't wait to try it out. The S256 compares almost identically to the GT3076r and the S258 is slightly better IMO.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #5  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: (Schister66)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The S256 compares almost identically to the GT3076r and the S258 is slightly better IMO. </TD></TR></TABLE>

oh everytime i see you say that i wish we lived close by so we could run (on the track)... one day maybe one day...

my advice to the op, GT3076R, if its a street car i would go with the 35r, the large engine will spool it at a decent time and the lag should be good for traction, i personally dont mind some lag...
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 04:11 PM
  #6  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Re: (blinx9900)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

oh everytime i see you say that i wish we lived close by so we could run (on the track)... one day maybe one day...</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well, if you missed the thread...there was a comparison of the GT3076 and the S256. They were pretty evenly matched. The S258 is even better than the S256 they tested. Also, the test vehicle was unable to move enough fuel to let the turbos really open up (which is the BW's strongpoint)
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #7  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: (Schister66)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Well, if you missed the thread...there was a comparison of the GT3076 and the S256. They were pretty evenly matched. The S258 is even better than the S256 they tested. Also, the test vehicle was unable to move enough fuel to let the turbos really open up (which is the BW's strongpoint)</TD></TR></TABLE>

i saw the thread, i also recall the 3076r spooling 500rpm earlier almost everywhere in the graph i know the bw unit was capable of flowing more air but i think thats only cause its a slightly larger unit, which makes me wonder if they made the unit the exact same size as the 3076r would it spool a little earlier to match it... but thats another topic all together...
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
gsr173's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Lake Havasu, Az, USA
Default

hey thanks everyone. very much appreciated :D
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
srqslop
Forced Induction
65
Feb 28, 2013 06:20 PM
30lbsboosting
Forced Induction
28
Mar 8, 2010 11:49 AM
jdmpoweredsol419
Forced Induction
1
Jun 2, 2009 05:34 AM
crxsirvtec
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
Sep 6, 2003 09:38 AM
MyWhiteCivic
Forced Induction
4
Oct 1, 2002 07:56 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.