<<< Hondata vs. AEM >>>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 01:54 PM
  #26  
Kamin's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,176
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default Re: <<< Hondata vs. AEM >>> (dbman96)

good write up!
ill give it 6 months for more of the AEM kinks to get worked out. Then ill decide on the ECU
ya ya i know this is a discussion topic but im confused now. does hondata allow on the fly programming? like if im at a stoplight and im running lean can i just up the mixture a little or do i need to turn the car off and reburn the rom? Thats possible with the 4B right? (i check hondata.com)


[Modified by KAMiN, 2:58 PM 3/19/2002]
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #27  
ekb18c's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,140
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default Re: <<< Hondata vs. AEM >>> (KAMiN)

AEM EMS was not meant for the average joe to start tunning the car. AEM EMS system was meant to be tunned by a pro. It will take some time before most tuners get their own little tricks in etc. AEM is more complex and sometimes with the complexity there may be problems.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toofresh1993
Engine Management and Tuning
13
Mar 13, 2010 06:51 AM
sohcvtec66
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
36
Dec 8, 2003 09:30 PM
PM-Performance
Forced Induction
9
Sep 10, 2003 11:56 AM
BoostedsiR
Forced Induction
3
Apr 20, 2003 07:43 PM
PressurizedSi
Forced Induction
2
Jan 27, 2002 07:59 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 AM.