has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet
#26
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Dallas/Miami, FL, USA
Posts: 11,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted hybrid)
also depends on what crank u use 89mm vs 87mm or what not 91mm even can be put in there
#27
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (Boostfed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
UH me!</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes Boostfed, i meant you and Viren as well. and whoever else tries this too.
UH me!</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes Boostfed, i meant you and Viren as well. and whoever else tries this too.
#28
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Dallas/Miami, FL, USA
Posts: 11,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (whiteghostblueflames)
hmm intersting thats why it pushes so much torque and gets out of the hole so damn quick thanks josh,..
#29
Honda-Tech Member
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (b18bturbo)
Benson says not to run more than 25lbs of boost above 84mm or you will start to eggshape the sleeve.
#31
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (r4adkshn1)
You dont have to. Its called spot facing the head to the combustion chamber. One school of thought represents the idea that the smaller bore will focus the swirl mixture closer into the center of the piston, giving a greater overall burn. The other school of thought states that the edge of the smaller bore will create a hot spot in the combustion chamber. I left my head 81mm with a 84.5mm bore on the block. I prescribe to the first theory btw.
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: nor cal
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted hybrid)
so going 4mm over would be safe for all honda blocks right? B, D, H, and F series??
boosted hybrid- so NO denotation whatsoever on your block because of the stock size combustion chambeR right??
boosted hybrid- so NO denotation whatsoever on your block because of the stock size combustion chambeR right??
#33
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted hybrid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You dont have to. Its called spot facing the head to the combustion chamber. One school of thought represents the idea that the smaller bore will focus the swirl mixture closer into the center of the piston, giving a greater overall burn. The other school of thought states that the edge of the smaller bore will create a hot spot in the combustion chamber. I left my head 81mm with a 84.5mm bore on the block. I prescribe to the first theory btw.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont know much on headgaskets but.. is your headgasket for the 81mm or the 84.5mm bore?
I dont know much on headgaskets but.. is your headgasket for the 81mm or the 84.5mm bore?
#34
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (Quick 200k Mile Motor)
GE 84.5mm overbored OEM headgasket. I would never attempt at using a stock bore headgasket. That is asking for trouble.
No detonation. There are plenty of people on this board that are doing the same thing without any issues.
No detonation. There are plenty of people on this board that are doing the same thing without any issues.
#35
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted hybrid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No detonation. There are plenty of people on this board that are doing the same thing without any issues.</TD></TR></TABLE>
hey Jeff, did you even get your new block/setup running yet?
hey Jeff, did you even get your new block/setup running yet?
#37
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted hybrid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
No detonation. There are plenty of people on this board that are doing the same thing without any issues.</TD></TR></TABLE>
not even a hint of pre-ignition after running it hard? When you tuned, did you end up running more retarded timing than standard -0.5deg per lb of boost?
No detonation. There are plenty of people on this board that are doing the same thing without any issues.</TD></TR></TABLE>
not even a hint of pre-ignition after running it hard? When you tuned, did you end up running more retarded timing than standard -0.5deg per lb of boost?
#38
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (Quick 200k Mile Motor)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quick 200k Mile Motor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
not even a hint of pre-ignition after running it hard? When you tuned, did you end up running more retarded timing than standard -0.5deg per lb of boost?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i don't think he has it running yet, let alone tuned. i think the motor is in but not yet running or on the road.
not even a hint of pre-ignition after running it hard? When you tuned, did you end up running more retarded timing than standard -0.5deg per lb of boost?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i don't think he has it running yet, let alone tuned. i think the motor is in but not yet running or on the road.
#39
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (sweet)
Has anyone here tried running an 85MM bore on a B16? Is it really worth it to go with a B16 because of the good rod/stroke ratio, or is that just something that's minor?
#40
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: has anyone run 85mm turbo bore as of yet (boosted92)
I would go with 85mm on a b16. The extra displacement will keep it lively below 4k rpm. It's just the sealing space in between cylinders is not enough imo (any b-series with 85mm bore). I would of course sleeve it, instead of keeping stock cylinder material that thin.
I actually like the bore greater than stroke concept. Have you noticed the new generation of motors have equal or greater bore than stroke, along with great rod/stroke?
Nissan is moving in that direction with the 350Z (99.5mm bore & 81.4mm) which took me by surprise. That is more bore than stroke than the RB26DETT (skyline motor)!
B16 w/ 85mm: 85mm/77.4mm stroke
RB26DETT: 86mm/73.7mm stroke
VQ35DE: 99.5mm/81.4mm stroke
In terms of power production we cant really compare our inline4 to an inline6 or V6 with near equal geometry. They just make their power in less span of rpm (for a heavier car).
I actually like the bore greater than stroke concept. Have you noticed the new generation of motors have equal or greater bore than stroke, along with great rod/stroke?
Nissan is moving in that direction with the 350Z (99.5mm bore & 81.4mm) which took me by surprise. That is more bore than stroke than the RB26DETT (skyline motor)!
B16 w/ 85mm: 85mm/77.4mm stroke
RB26DETT: 86mm/73.7mm stroke
VQ35DE: 99.5mm/81.4mm stroke
In terms of power production we cant really compare our inline4 to an inline6 or V6 with near equal geometry. They just make their power in less span of rpm (for a heavier car).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blazin
Forced Induction
15
04-03-2003 09:38 AM
fastludeh22
Honda Prelude
8
08-15-2002 01:16 PM