GT35R vs. SC63 ?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #1  
mrx's Avatar
mrx
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default GT35R vs. SC63 ?!?

Hallo,

a friend of mine want to order his turbo in the next days and he is
unsure about the exact model to take.

GT35R or SC63

the hp goal is something in the 500-600 whp region.
the gt35r is very expensive so he thought taking the sc63 but don't know how
big the difference in spool up would be.

engine would be a 2L fully build b16

i know thats not much info but hope to get some comments.

Thanks
Malte
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (mrx)

He could get the sc61 instead of the sc63, will spool quicker and can make great power in that range.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #3  
Rod.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (95GSRTT)

go with the sc61 and use the extra money for something else maybe tuning
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #4  
b18c198's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (Rod.)

yea go with the sc61 turbo, such a great turbo in which I plan on getting and selling my t3t4 .50 trim.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #5  
flip1199's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
From: sacramento, ca, usa
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (b18c198)

t3/t67 seems to be a really popular turbo right now.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #6  
Rod.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (flip1199)

oh yea forgot about the t3/67
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #7  
s2kdre's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Skmotoring.com
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (Rod.)

all the sc turbos go for the same price.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
kamAccord's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (jdmhonda)

Great topic! Why the SC61 over the GT35R? Price only or does teh SC61 spool similar to the ball bearing GT35R?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #9  
b16sedan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (jdmhonda)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmhonda &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">all the sc turbos go for the same price.</TD></TR></TABLE>

SC63 is more expensive because it's big shaft.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kamAccord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Great topic! Why the SC61 over the GT35R? Price only or does teh SC61 spool similar to the ball bearing GT35R?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The ball bearing makes a bit of difference, but they are very similar given the same exhaust housing. I think going SC61 over the 35R is a nice way to save 500 bucks that could be better spent elsewhere.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #10  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (b16sedan)

on a recent thread. the gt35r took about 300rpm longer to reach full boost. but it made more topend power.

im debating between a pt61 or a pt71 at this point
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #11  
b16sedan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (wantboost)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on a recent thread. the gt35r took about 300rpm longer to reach full boost. but it made more topend power.

im debating between a pt61 or a pt71 at this point</TD></TR></TABLE>

The 35R took 300 RPM's longer because it was a .82 A/R hot side, vs. a .63 A/R hot side on the SC61.

A PT61 and a PT71 are a pretty huge jump to decide between. The 61 is like a 630 WHP turbo, and the 71 is like an 830 WHP turbo with a lot more lag.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #12  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (b16sedan)

yea i know. im leaning towards the pt71.

84.5mm sleeved ls/vtec. manley rods, cp pistons, fully built,ported and polished gsr head. Im probably gonna be running the car on c16 all of the time and my goals are around 700plus on c16
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #13  
Turbocivic94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,002
Likes: 0
From: CT, USA
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (wantboost)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea i know. im leaning towards the pt71.

84.5mm sleeved ls/vtec. manley rods, cp pistons, fully built,ported and polished gsr head. Im probably gonna be running the car on c16 all of the time and my goals are around 700plus on c16</TD></TR></TABLE>

PT-71 is a nice turbo, try T4/T67
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #14  
flip1199's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
From: sacramento, ca, usa
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (Turbocivic94)

t3/t67 730whp on 31lbs https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1279321

dont think u really need a pt-71. try a t4/t67
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #15  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: GT35R vs. SC63 ?!? (flip1199)

hmm, i might try the t3/t67, but how much more lag is there with the H.O option?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 09:11 PM
  #16  
DRIVENRacing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default

35r is by far the most impressive turbo ive dealt with... if you have the money, give it a shot
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #17  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: (adSPEED)

think i have enough money for a gt35r.

i have about 6k to get my motor done (turbo, mani, wg, dp, charge pipng, intake mani, injectors, tb, hondata -475 (fully unlocked), fuel pump, lines rail and regualtor and finally painting the car)
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #18  
liam821's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 26
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: (wantboost)


There was a big descusion about this the other day here on honda-tech and had a bunch of dynos...

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1291417

enjoy!

liam
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #19  
CRVRX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default Re: (liam821)

If you have the loot , Go with the GT35R. I love this turbo!

I have a Hybrid version of the 35R( My own concocksion), My dyno runs start at 4000 rpms and I hit full boost by 4800 rpm ( 20+psi) with a fantasic power band.

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #20  
BoostR41's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: southwest, PA, USA
Default Re: (CRVRX)

the 35R is a very nice turbo....I would pick it over any of the ones above
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AaronJ
Forced Induction
22
Jun 5, 2006 10:29 AM
darrell87
Forced Induction
6
May 21, 2006 07:25 PM
93first1
Forced Induction
5
Apr 5, 2006 05:12 AM
mrx
Forced Induction
3
Oct 15, 2005 08:32 PM
GSRfoedoe
Forced Induction
15
Aug 26, 2002 10:08 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.