First Dyno pull today
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
Re: First Dyno pull today (tygsr)
nice numbers, 11.6 on 112 is a bit rich even on the dyno, unless it was closed circulation ... ideally a good 12.3ish on the street is good and safe
greg
greg
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: SLC, utah, USA
Re: First Dyno pull today (B20C5 Turbo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B20C5 Turbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You did forget to mention that the Dynojet numbers you quoted are "SAE Corrected" while the Mustang numbers quoted were "Actual" readings. That may not make much difference at sea level, but it amounts to about 20% at 4300 ft in the 'Mountains'. I can post the "actual" Dynojet charts for Karl's "Nasty" if you would like. As I recall, they were around 560 HP (actual).
Fortunately (for you) the two actual horsepower readings are within 2% of each other, which implies that you were able to correctly calibrate your Mustang dyno on that day for that car.
Personally, I would rather tune my car on a dyno that doesn't require human input (read potential cheating) to display my output. That might also be why the Dynojet 248 is endorsed by NASCAR and the Mustang dyno isn't.
Bring in your car, Tyler. If any of our Dynojets actual or corrected readings are within 2% of your equavalent Mustang plots, it's free. If not, you could still share your experience here for others to see. What have you got to loose?
Modified by B20C5 Turbo at 10:22 AM 4/13/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>Hey Mark how you doin and congrats on the new born.
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. I now have the mustang to read close to the same output as the dynojets. I used Jonathan Bennions Type R to calibrate the dyno for all the 2WD vehicles. Jon made a very consistent 195hp on the dynojet and the stock parasitics that mustang recomends for hondas Jon was making 163hp. I adjusted the parasitics untill he made about 190 hp ( no cheating ) A little bit LESS than he was making on the Dynojet. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers
I would like to schedule a time for Tyler Hansen and me to do some base Hp pulls to see how close the parasitcs are between the dyno's
When I am not so busy i will stop by with some Tell everyone Hi 
Modified by uglyasscivic at 5:27 PM 4/14/2003
You did forget to mention that the Dynojet numbers you quoted are "SAE Corrected" while the Mustang numbers quoted were "Actual" readings. That may not make much difference at sea level, but it amounts to about 20% at 4300 ft in the 'Mountains'. I can post the "actual" Dynojet charts for Karl's "Nasty" if you would like. As I recall, they were around 560 HP (actual).
Fortunately (for you) the two actual horsepower readings are within 2% of each other, which implies that you were able to correctly calibrate your Mustang dyno on that day for that car.
Personally, I would rather tune my car on a dyno that doesn't require human input (read potential cheating) to display my output. That might also be why the Dynojet 248 is endorsed by NASCAR and the Mustang dyno isn't.
Bring in your car, Tyler. If any of our Dynojets actual or corrected readings are within 2% of your equavalent Mustang plots, it's free. If not, you could still share your experience here for others to see. What have you got to loose?
Modified by B20C5 Turbo at 10:22 AM 4/13/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>Hey Mark how you doin and congrats on the new born.
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. I now have the mustang to read close to the same output as the dynojets. I used Jonathan Bennions Type R to calibrate the dyno for all the 2WD vehicles. Jon made a very consistent 195hp on the dynojet and the stock parasitics that mustang recomends for hondas Jon was making 163hp. I adjusted the parasitics untill he made about 190 hp ( no cheating ) A little bit LESS than he was making on the Dynojet. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers
I would like to schedule a time for Tyler Hansen and me to do some base Hp pulls to see how close the parasitcs are between the dyno's
When I am not so busy i will stop by with some
Tell everyone Hi Modified by uglyasscivic at 5:27 PM 4/14/2003
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Re: First Dyno pull today (uglyasscivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by uglyasscivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hey Mark how you doin and congrats on the new born.
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. I now have the mustang to read close to the same output as the dynojets. I used Jonathan Bennions Type R to calibrate the dyno for all the 2WD vehicles. Jon made a very consistent 195hp on the dynojet and the stock parasitics that mustang recomends for hondas Jon was making 163hp. I adjusted the parasitics untill he made about 190 hp ( no cheating ) A little bit LESS than he was making on the Dynojet. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers
I would like to schedule a time for Tyler Hansen and me to do some base Hp pulls to see how close the parasitcs are between the dyno's
When I am not so busy i will stop by with some Tell everyone Hi
Modified by uglyasscivic at 5:27 PM 4/14/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would be down for a pull on the dynojet! Maybe then I will break 400hp
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. I now have the mustang to read close to the same output as the dynojets. I used Jonathan Bennions Type R to calibrate the dyno for all the 2WD vehicles. Jon made a very consistent 195hp on the dynojet and the stock parasitics that mustang recomends for hondas Jon was making 163hp. I adjusted the parasitics untill he made about 190 hp ( no cheating ) A little bit LESS than he was making on the Dynojet. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers
I would like to schedule a time for Tyler Hansen and me to do some base Hp pulls to see how close the parasitcs are between the dyno's
When I am not so busy i will stop by with some
Tell everyone Hi Modified by uglyasscivic at 5:27 PM 4/14/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would be down for a pull on the dynojet! Maybe then I will break 400hp
New User
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Ut
Re: First Dyno pull today (uglyasscivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hey Mark how you doin and congrats on the new born.
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers</TD></TR></TABLE>
I totally agree.. The real proof is at the track. I do like to view my tests as uncorrected because that number actually means something. Just keep in mind that anytime I give somebody a printout, it's corrected.
Does your dyno have a weather station?
Anyway, There are alot of things that I like about both dyno's, but they both have their pro's and con's. At the end of the day I could care less what the outputs are. Dynos are just a tuning tool in my eyes. The track is where you show the REAL numbers</TD></TR></TABLE>
I totally agree.. The real proof is at the track. I do like to view my tests as uncorrected because that number actually means something. Just keep in mind that anytime I give somebody a printout, it's corrected.
Does your dyno have a weather station?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: SLC, utah, USA
Re: First Dyno pull today (B20C5 Turbo)
Yes our dyno has a weather station and it also show both corrected and non-corrected outputs. At first I hated the Mustang because I was so used to the dynojet, but I have grow to like it . I wish it had the dynojet software and I would really like it alot.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
Re: First Dyno pull today (tygsr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tygsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">First my setup is: drag gen 3 kit, jg edelbrock intake manifold, JE 9:1 pistons, eagle rods , mild porting of head. DSM 450's, walbro high pressure, aeromotive 1:1 FPR..STOCK SLEEVES!!
7psi-235.9 hp 181lbft
20psi-390.1hp 306.3 lbft
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Man didnt you hear the Eagles suck. Ditch them and get some good ones. J/K man looks good and seriously let me know how the rods hold the power, I have them in my engine.
7psi-235.9 hp 181lbft
20psi-390.1hp 306.3 lbft
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Man didnt you hear the Eagles suck. Ditch them and get some good ones. J/K man looks good and seriously let me know how the rods hold the power, I have them in my engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post