<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SPOOLINmatt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is it divided t4?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes sir, .82a/r.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BB6-213 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yes sir, .82a/r.</TD></TR></TABLE>

nothing bigger, i currently have a 1.00 on my t4t67 divided. Divided tends to take away some of the flow VOLUME.

 

We do have a 1.24 in the t4 if that is what you are asking.

Here is our new 70mm

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">We do have a 1.24 in the t4 if that is what you are asking.

Here is our new 70mm

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Is this the one with the billet wheel that CFT made 800+ with, but is in the same housing frame as the S366?

 

Yes Sir.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SPOOLINmatt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

nothing bigger, i currently have a 1.00 on my t4t67 divided. Divided tends to take away some of the flow VOLUME. </TD></TR></TABLE>

But what turbine wheel do you have??? There are two different S300 turbine wheels and they are both bigger than a "P" trim. So a/r is not the only thing to look at when it comes to determining the over all flow of the turbine side of the turbo.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Coming soon and they look very impressive. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Great! I'm building a K and debating between the s372 and the s368 but have not seen any testing done yet from the 68. I'll keep posted on ur results

 

While i'm sure the 368 is great, there should not be a debate between the 372 and the 368 when it comes to power. Only reason not to go 372 on the K is because of the rules, and that's where the 368 comes in.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes Sir.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats just awesome, deffinatley nice to know that I can build my manifold for the 366, and if I need to upgrade to the 70mm, it will still fit without any modification. BW

 

well i got the measurements on the compressor housing of the turbo i have. the inducer was 2.5inches (63.5mm) and the exducer was 3.5inches (88.9mm).

the compressor housing was about 8 inches in diameter, the outlet was 2 1/4inches and the intake was about 3 3/4inches.

i haven't got a chance to pull off the exhaust housing and measure it but its a total diameter of 4 inches V-band with about a 3 - 3 1/8 inner exhaust outlet. but when i do pull it off i'll let you know....


Modified by DeleriouS25 at 11:12 PM 1/23/2008

 

Holy crap, I hope it's going on a rotary

 

i have come to realize that the compressor housing is similar to the gt4088.

 

nope its going on a fully built b20....still deciding on whether or not to keep the stock head or a vtec head (obviously with after market goodies) .....

 

Guess I'll chime in. I had a GT35R, then switched to a S62 (very similar to S362) from Forced Inductions, then I went to the S66 and loved it but wanted quicker spool. So now I'm running their new FI-66 extended tip unit which is ball bearing, water cooled...yadda...yadda. So now with the extended tip 66mm and Ball bearing this thing is ridiculous how fast it spools and makes power all the way to redline. Also they swapped to custom center sections and now build them to drop in place of the GT35R's and Precision units which I have always used. I aim to get some #'s at the track once it thaws out....

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Importrev &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Guess I'll chime in. I had a GT35R, then switched to a S62 (very similar to S362) from Forced Inductions, then I went to the S66 and loved it but wanted quicker spool. So now I'm running their new FI-66 extended tip unit which is ball bearing, water cooled...yadda...yadda. So now with the extended tip 66mm and Ball bearing this thing is ridiculous how fast it spools and makes power all the way to redline. Also they swapped to custom center sections and now build them to drop in place of the GT35R's and Precision units which I have always used. I aim to get some #'s at the track once it thaws out.... </TD></TR></TABLE>

Similar to what FP was doing. taking an ETT compressor wheel, and fitting it to a Garrett cartridge. Hybridization is rather normal.

 

Mine is still using the BW comp wheel and turbine wheel. Nothing Garrett that I know of on mine.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheShodan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Similar to what FP was doing. taking an ETT compressor wheel, and fitting it to a Garrett cartridge. Hybridization is rather normal.</TD></TR></TABLE>


What wheel is FP using that is ETT?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


What wheel is FP using that is ETT?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Technically its not a ETT (though it looks like it.) The 59mm inducer that is on the other thread, you know, the "HTA" GT35R

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DeleriouS25 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nope its going on a fully built b20....still deciding on whether or not to keep the stock head or a vtec head (obviously with after market goodies) .....</TD></TR></TABLE>

My bad, for some reason I though you said it had a 88mm Inducer

 

haha if only i could afford something that big! 88 inducer 120 exducer! 1200hp here i come! i wish

 

which is better for a stock gsr motor wanting to make max 380whp on a borg warner t3t4.

.63ar 60trim or .63ar 57trim

i know its not that much difference, but I rather have somethign that has good top end breathing but spools really early in the RPM band.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integlspwr2k &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">which is better for a stock gsr motor wanting to make max 380whp on a borg warner t3t4.

.63ar 60trim or .63ar 57trim

i know its not that much difference, but I rather have somethign that has good top end breathing but spools really early in the RPM band.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm trying to understand your question b/w T3/T4 and Borg-Warner.. could you elaborate a little please?

 

You need the T3 inlet .55 a/r stainless housing we make for the the To4E 57 trim. It will spool great and make 380whp no problem.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You need the T3 inlet .55 a/r stainless housing we make for the the To4E 57 trim. It will spool great and make 380whp no problem.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I would add to make sure that the smaller exhaust wheel is used in the .55A/r for that housing in order to gain benefits of responsiveness.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbodano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The compressor technology is more important than what bearing system you have. The reason most people see a spool up difference over a non bb unit is because a bb unit is not affected as much by high oil pressure. A non bb unit should never see more than 55 psi or it starts to over load the bearings causing lag and poor spool. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Now Im confused. I was always under the impression that restrictors are used only on BB turbos.