Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: plantation, fl, usa
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
I've used both of these turbos on a lot of high HP car but havent had a chance to do both of them back to back.. here is a car that i finished up tonight on relatively low boost..
setup:
84x89 lsvtec
9.5 to 1 compression je pistons
eagle rods
stock port b16 head
stock b16 cams
Victorx intake
open T4 topmount
precsion 750 intercooler
E85
S300
67/65 is journal bearing with a .68 back housing
64/65 is ball bearing with a .81 back housing
both are on 18 psi
Red line= Precision 67/65 journal bearing
Blue line= Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Ball Bearing
setup:
84x89 lsvtec
9.5 to 1 compression je pistons
eagle rods
stock port b16 head
stock b16 cams
Victorx intake
open T4 topmount
precsion 750 intercooler
E85
S300
67/65 is journal bearing with a .68 back housing
64/65 is ball bearing with a .81 back housing
both are on 18 psi
Red line= Precision 67/65 journal bearing
Blue line= Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Ball Bearing
#2
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
Should have used the .81 on both turbos. I believe they are interchangeable? I just picked up one for a customers car, good to see some number since I havent seen anyone else using these.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: plantation, fl, usa
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
i did a back to back previously with the 67 with both rear housings...spool was even worse... no point comparing the 64 to that...
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: plantation, fl, usa
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
i did a stock bore/stroke b16 back in december with the 64/68. made 800hp on 36psi
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
Nice comparison, probably 100whp sitting on the table with a good cam swap, shame such a setup has the most horrible cam available in it.
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: plantation, fl, usa
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
yeah its the billet Turbonetics... hard to say on higher boost levels, but i have made 850hp on the 64 before so i dont see it falling off too much compared to the 67 on higher boost
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
if the precision was a ball bearing turbo like the turbonetics one that would have made for more of a fair comparison as well... still interesting
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: plantation, fl, usa
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Precision 67/65 vs Turbonetics-HPC 64/65 Dyno
a lot of things could have made it more fair... same housings..bb..etc.. but these are the turbos i had. point was to show that the billet 64 is a very capable turbo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post