MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
#1
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Just testing a few items due to a 21mpg '98 D16Y8.
Can I get some opinions on the following information, please?
Some wire color information might seem off as this is in another vehicle ('88 CRX with P28).
MAP RED/YEL to - is 5.03v
MAP YEL/RED to GRN/WHT is 4.99v
MAP WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.64v
With engine running:
MAP middle wire:
-0.02 at idle
TPS YEL/WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.98v
TPS YEL/WHT to - is 5.02v
With engine running:
TPS middle wire:
0.47 at idle (700rpm or so)
0.50 at 1000rpm
0.55 at 1500rpm
0.60 at 2000rpm
0.66 at 2500rpm
0.70 at 3000rpm
0.74 at 3500rpm
For wire color information, from the '88 CRX ETM:
MAP (C217):
*WHT goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT (-) goes to ECU (Input)
*YEL/RED (+) goes to ECU (Input)
TPS (C168):
*YEL/WHT goes to EGR Valve Lift Sensor
*RED/BLU goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT goes to a splice (S103) that is shared with the IAT, Coolant Temp (TW), EGR Valve Lift Sensor, and another splice (S443)
Can I get some opinions on the following information, please?
Some wire color information might seem off as this is in another vehicle ('88 CRX with P28).
MAP RED/YEL to - is 5.03v
MAP YEL/RED to GRN/WHT is 4.99v
MAP WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.64v
With engine running:
MAP middle wire:
-0.02 at idle
TPS YEL/WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.98v
TPS YEL/WHT to - is 5.02v
With engine running:
TPS middle wire:
0.47 at idle (700rpm or so)
0.50 at 1000rpm
0.55 at 1500rpm
0.60 at 2000rpm
0.66 at 2500rpm
0.70 at 3000rpm
0.74 at 3500rpm
For wire color information, from the '88 CRX ETM:
MAP (C217):
*WHT goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT (-) goes to ECU (Input)
*YEL/RED (+) goes to ECU (Input)
TPS (C168):
*YEL/WHT goes to EGR Valve Lift Sensor
*RED/BLU goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT goes to a splice (S103) that is shared with the IAT, Coolant Temp (TW), EGR Valve Lift Sensor, and another splice (S443)
Last edited by NOFX; 11-18-2013 at 08:13 PM.
#3
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Ok I got a few Questions for you any cels being thrown, Are your fuel injectors the correct Sized for that moter/ecu
and as for your tps you dont need the car running and Idk what to tell you with that information it should go from .48 at closed throttle to exactly 4.5v at wide open
and for adjusting https://honda-tech.com/forums/tech-misc-15/diy-how-calibrating-voltage-your-tps-sensor-2947986/
and as for your tps you dont need the car running and Idk what to tell you with that information it should go from .48 at closed throttle to exactly 4.5v at wide open
and for adjusting https://honda-tech.com/forums/tech-misc-15/diy-how-calibrating-voltage-your-tps-sensor-2947986/
#4
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
More concerned with the MAP. Output tested bad. Going to wire in the other MAP I have.
I'm not sure what you see wrong with the TPS testing. Got the reference voltage tests from the Honda FSM and the TPS is a potentiometer so I tested at different rpm.
I'm not sure what you see wrong with the TPS testing. Got the reference voltage tests from the Honda FSM and the TPS is a potentiometer so I tested at different rpm.
#7
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Engine was previously running 33mpg in this car btw. I do not expect it to be related to the set-up of the swap, as people keep suggesting (without ever imagining that maybe in two years something could fail or wear out!).
Trending Topics
#8
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
P28 with D16Y8 chip? Or does the Y8 run perfectly on a D16Z6 ECU?
MAP RED/YEL to - is 5.03v
MAP YEL/RED to GRN/WHT is 4.99v
MAP WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.64v
I think you meant Yel/Red here^. if so, looks fine.
Voltage? What color is the middle wire?
Looks fine.
Okay
Nope. This wire get 5 reference volts from the ECU. The TPS has nothing to do with the EGR valve.
Yes
MAP RED/YEL to - is 5.03v
MAP YEL/RED to GRN/WHT is 4.99v
MAP WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.64v
With engine running:
MAP middle wire:
-0.02 at idle
MAP middle wire:
-0.02 at idle
TPS YEL/WHT to GRN/WHT is 4.98v
TPS YEL/WHT to - is 5.02v
With engine running:
TPS middle wire:
0.47 at idle (700rpm or so)
0.50 at 1000rpm
0.55 at 1500rpm
0.60 at 2000rpm
0.66 at 2500rpm
0.70 at 3000rpm
0.74 at 3500rpm
TPS YEL/WHT to - is 5.02v
With engine running:
TPS middle wire:
0.47 at idle (700rpm or so)
0.50 at 1000rpm
0.55 at 1500rpm
0.60 at 2000rpm
0.66 at 2500rpm
0.70 at 3000rpm
0.74 at 3500rpm
For wire color information, from the '88 CRX ETM:
MAP (C217):
*WHT goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT (-) goes to ECU (Input)
*YEL/RED (+) goes to ECU (Input)
MAP (C217):
*WHT goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT (-) goes to ECU (Input)
*YEL/RED (+) goes to ECU (Input)
*YEL/WHT goes to EGR Valve Lift Sensor
*RED/BLU goes to ECU (Input)
*GRN/WHT goes to a splice (S103) that is shared with the IAT, Coolant Temp (TW), EGR Valve Lift Sensor, and another splice (S443)
*GRN/WHT goes to a splice (S103) that is shared with the IAT, Coolant Temp (TW), EGR Valve Lift Sensor, and another splice (S443)
#9
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Chipped P28. Timing is different between the D16Z6 (which is the engine that matches to the P28) and the D16Y8.
Yes. Typo.
Middle wire is GRN/WHT.
MAP is:
1 WHT output
2 GRN/WHT -
3 YEL/RED +
WHT to negative at idle 0.98. WHT to negative key on position engine off 0.01.
I could have gotten crossed in the books.
TPS is:
1 YEL/WHT +
2 RED/BLU output
3 GRN/WHT -
Yes. Typo.
Middle wire is GRN/WHT.
MAP is:
1 WHT output
2 GRN/WHT -
3 YEL/RED +
WHT to negative at idle 0.98. WHT to negative key on position engine off 0.01.
TPS is:
1 YEL/WHT +
2 RED/BLU output
3 GRN/WHT -
#10
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
All sensor information looks fine.
Last ignition system tune up? Ignition timing set to spec? Fuel pressure fine? Any stuck open injectors? Engine running cold? Brakes dragging? Low tire pressure? Combination of latter?
Last ignition system tune up? Ignition timing set to spec? Fuel pressure fine? Any stuck open injectors? Engine running cold? Brakes dragging? Low tire pressure? Combination of latter?
#11
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Will have to check fuel pressure. How could I tell an injector is stuck open?
#12
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Wires replaced two years ago iirc.
Cap, rotor, distributor? Any CEL codes?
Will have to check fuel pressure.
Exhaust leak near O2 sensor?
#13
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Anyway to test consistent reliability of the current wires?
I believe I did the cap and rotor recently. With so many cars it gets confusing. Absolutely zero codes for the moment.
On the topic of CELs though, I realized several weeks ago that though I did not have a visible CEL on in the dash, when I jumped the wires to read any CELs, I had a "soft code" for the VTEC Solenoid Valve. I cleared it, gassed up twice since then and have repeatedly checked for CELs again and have found none. No idea why it came on to begin with.
I'll have to rent a tester for the fuel pressure.
I believe I have (for the entire life of the swap) an exhaust leak between the header and b-pipe, but there is no leak near the single O2 sensor in the Civic exhaust.
#14
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Ohm test and check for spark arcing in a dark place at night.
Well, better check or replace them. Also consider Ohm testing the coil and having AZ test the ICM.
I think you mean the A-pipe. Best to fix the leak and check for a cracked header.
I believe I did the cap and rotor recently. With so many cars it gets confusing.
I believe I have (for the entire life of the swap) an exhaust leak between the header and b-pipe, but there is no leak near the single O2 sensor in the Civic exhaust.
#15
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
B-pipe. A-pipe went out with the HF exhaust manifold. I'm using the Civic EX exhaust manifold now, with the CRX b-pipe next, and the CRX muffler following that.
So the leak is under the passenger compartment of the vehicle.
http://www.hondapartsdeals.com/hpa_p...onGroupID=5986
Last edited by NOFX; 11-18-2013 at 10:39 PM.
#16
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
MPG drop seems to be fairly common in a lot (according to many posts here) of older civics. My guess and assumption is a weakened o2 sensor. Unfortunately, it is an expensive part to guess at. May try Scotty Kilmer's (youtube) o2 sensor cleaning method or this way
(at your own risk).
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
it is much easier to test the tps with the key on engine off . Is your o2 sensor located in the rear of the manifold ? another sensor that can greatly effect fuel economy is the Ect sensor .
#18
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
#19
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
So I rented a fuel pressure tester only to discover it (and the entire store) didn't have an adapter small enough for my car.
I really don't think I have a fuel delivery issue though. The car doesn't have much of a runability problem at all. Maybe a little bit of an occasional rough idle and a bit of a hiccup when starting from a stop.
My setup has a single 4 wire primary O2 sensor. No code is thrown unless the sensor is unplugged. Tests of the sensor show a good sensor. I also tested a brand new O2 sensor and got similar results.
My O2 sensor is a standard primary O2 sensor on my 1998 Civic EX exhaust manifold.
TPS is:
1 YEL/WHT +
2 RED/BLU output
3 GRN/WHT -
TPS output is 0.52 KOEO and 0.46 at idle. Just went out and checked.
HF MAP: 0.98 idling. 0.01 KOEO.
Y8 MAP: 1.01 idling. 2.96 KOEO.
HF MAP reads approximately the same now... but the engine bay is to temp now and it's been dry all day. Last few days when I tested the bay was cold and weather had been very wet.
Upon extending wires and plugging in the Y8 MAP, the car seemed to idle smoother and take off smoother.
Gassed up on my way home from work. 21.9mpg on 53 miles.
I really don't think I have a fuel delivery issue though. The car doesn't have much of a runability problem at all. Maybe a little bit of an occasional rough idle and a bit of a hiccup when starting from a stop.
My setup has a single 4 wire primary O2 sensor. No code is thrown unless the sensor is unplugged. Tests of the sensor show a good sensor. I also tested a brand new O2 sensor and got similar results.
My O2 sensor is a standard primary O2 sensor on my 1998 Civic EX exhaust manifold.
TPS is:
1 YEL/WHT +
2 RED/BLU output
3 GRN/WHT -
TPS output is 0.52 KOEO and 0.46 at idle. Just went out and checked.
HF MAP: 0.98 idling. 0.01 KOEO.
Y8 MAP: 1.01 idling. 2.96 KOEO.
HF MAP reads approximately the same now... but the engine bay is to temp now and it's been dry all day. Last few days when I tested the bay was cold and weather had been very wet.
Upon extending wires and plugging in the Y8 MAP, the car seemed to idle smoother and take off smoother.
Gassed up on my way home from work. 21.9mpg on 53 miles.
#20
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
To clarify the order of things, I did the 5v reference tests a few days ago. Before work today I extended the MAP wiring and plugged in the Y8 MAP. Drove to work. Got off work, filled the tank again, drove some, tested the Y8 MAP output, tested the HF MAP output.
O2 sensor was something I tested extensively and repeatedly weeks ago.
O2 sensor was something I tested extensively and repeatedly weeks ago.
#21
H-T White Ops
Thread Starter
Re: MAP TPS Poor Fuel Economy
Gotten an occasional hunting idle a few times since the MAP swap. It only seems to occur after the car has been driven and parked at temp. And it doesn't always happen.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gant
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
6
05-18-2005 08:47 PM
xXx Justin xXx
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
06-18-2003 09:49 AM