What turbo?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Okemos, MI, USA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What turbo?
I know you guys get a lot of these questions, but I am not en engine guy. . . I can design my own suspensions, but engine are really foreign to me.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
#3
Re: What turbo? (vamz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know you guys get a lot of these questions, but I am not en engine guy. . . I can design my own suspensions, but engine are really foreign to me.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know how you bored that out to 1.8L.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know how you bored that out to 1.8L.
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Well, it's sleeved, so if he's running a stock 77mm crank and bored it to 86mm, then he'd be about 1.8, of course his cylinder walls might be a bit thin.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, it's sleeved, so if he's running a stock 77mm crank and bored it to 86mm, then he'd be about 1.8, of course his cylinder walls might be a bit thin.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah i dont think i would go any bigger then 85mm on a turbo motor.
Yeah i dont think i would go any bigger then 85mm on a turbo motor.
#6
Re: (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, it's sleeved, so if he's running a stock 77mm crank and bored it to 86mm, then he'd be about 1.8, of course his cylinder walls might be a bit thin.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Even 86 is a bit short of 1.8. I think he may have been thinking of 84mm sleeves, and thinking that 84mm on 1.8 = 2.0, even though it = 1.93 on a GSR, and thinking 84mm will add .2L of displacement to his B16
Even 86 is a bit short of 1.8. I think he may have been thinking of 84mm sleeves, and thinking that 84mm on 1.8 = 2.0, even though it = 1.93 on a GSR, and thinking 84mm will add .2L of displacement to his B16
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Napoleon Dynamite)
I figured 1.79 was close enough to call it a 1.8, but I think you're right, he's got an 84 or 85mm bore and hasn't done the math.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I figured 1.79 was close enough to call it a 1.8, but I think you're right, he's got an 84 or 85mm bore and hasn't done the math.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't even know if his sleezes could hold an 86mm bore
I don't even know if his sleezes could hold an 86mm bore
#10
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Okemos, MI, USA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (rmcdaniels)
It started out as a b16, it is bored out to almost 1.8 liters, not quite. Darton sleeves are much stronger than stock.
And that link didn't really help all that much.
And that link didn't really help all that much.
#11
Re: (vamz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It started out as a b16, it is bored out to almost 1.8 liters, not quite. Darton sleeves are much stronger than stock.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So what bore is it?
84mm takes you to a little bit over 1.7 litres, and anything more than that really isn't the best choice for turbo.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So what bore is it?
84mm takes you to a little bit over 1.7 litres, and anything more than that really isn't the best choice for turbo.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (vamz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It started out as a b16, it is bored out to almost 1.8 liters, not quite. Darton sleeves are much stronger than stock.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Did you check out the links I posted in that thread?
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...s.htm
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...2.htm
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Did you check out the links I posted in that thread?
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...s.htm
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...2.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TealCivic115
Forced Induction
6
08-27-2011 03:27 PM
DRKSol
Tech / Misc
5
04-17-2004 10:18 PM