Turbo Head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #26  
Fkned's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 1
Default Re: Turbo Head (Fkned)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Fkned &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Would you have your block sleeved to a smaller then stock bore and put a B16 crank in for the same reason of just doing something different?
It makes no sense.

There's a reason Vtec is the common way to go.

</TD></TR></TABLE>Sorry I do heads for a living,and I still think it falls under the statement above.I'll even add to it-Would you make an all motor engine with 8:1 compression just to be different?
Unless you have a problem with making HP and drivability stay with the Vtec head.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #27  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: Turbo Head (Fkned)

wow, possibly dumbest thread of 2008, 1.5Slowmatic you are officially a waste of sperm and egg, and to the other two guys the sarcasm was very obvious, you could tell by him using the entire engine code of the d15 aka craptastic head...

now on the whole non-vtec crap i only see a few logical reason to eliminate vtec or purposely run a motor without it and thats that you race in a particular class that does not allow vtec or you just got made love for another motor for personal reasons. If you want to build a non-vtec cause you think it will be better then you can have some of these
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaymee1782
Acura Integra
11
Apr 13, 2016 10:54 AM
bradysyde
Forced Induction
4
Mar 20, 2013 07:04 PM
Snailor Built
Forced Induction
8
Sep 15, 2009 08:34 AM
RudeLude83
Acura Integra
5
May 20, 2007 03:50 PM
94_CRVtec
Forced Induction
9
Jan 27, 2005 06:27 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 AM.