Turbo Head
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Fkned »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Would you have your block sleeved to a smaller then stock bore and put a B16 crank in for the same reason of just doing something different?
It makes no sense.
There's a reason Vtec is the common way to go.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Sorry I do heads for a living,and I still think it falls under the statement above.I'll even add to it-Would you make an all motor engine with 8:1 compression just to be different?
Unless you have a problem with making HP and drivability stay with the Vtec head.
It makes no sense.
There's a reason Vtec is the common way to go.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Sorry I do heads for a living,and I still think it falls under the statement above.I'll even add to it-Would you make an all motor engine with 8:1 compression just to be different?
Unless you have a problem with making HP and drivability stay with the Vtec head.
wow, possibly dumbest thread of 2008, 1.5Slowmatic you are officially a waste of sperm and egg, and to the other two guys the sarcasm was very obvious, you could tell by him using the entire engine code of the d15 aka craptastic head...
now on the whole non-vtec crap i only see a few logical reason to eliminate vtec or purposely run a motor without it and thats that you race in a particular class that does not allow vtec or you just got made love for another motor for personal reasons. If you want to build a non-vtec cause you think it will be better then you can have some of these
now on the whole non-vtec crap i only see a few logical reason to eliminate vtec or purposely run a motor without it and thats that you race in a particular class that does not allow vtec or you just got made love for another motor for personal reasons. If you want to build a non-vtec cause you think it will be better then you can have some of these
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



