Too small of an intercooler =??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Bnjmn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Default Too small of an intercooler =??

What are the downsides of picking an intercooler that may be too small- the only problem is that the intake charge will not be cooled as much? If some other cooling effect is added downstream (like auxiliary meth injection) I'll be able to get by with a relatively smaller IC, correct?

Thanks
Ben
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 07:08 PM
  #2  
squirrel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =?? (Bnjmn)

IMO most people's intercoolers are excessively over sized
What size are you talking about? And what is your set up?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
Bnjmn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =?? (squirrel)

setup is a 2L 500hp B18C, looking to go with a 6x18x3" IC...maybe smaller.
I've done a bit of investigating with the methanol injection- the Supra guys were getting intake charges around 32 F. I need the IC to keep temps down when the meth isn't on- low/unboosted conditions.

Thanks
Ben
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
hybridreams's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =??

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=547352
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #5  
hondatool's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, TX, US
Default

ive never really seen an intercooler too small but if your running high boost then a slightly bigger one might do to keep the intake temps cool but i dont think there is a huge difference...but i might be wrong
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 05:53 AM
  #6  
Bnjmn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =?? (hybridreams)

Thanks for the link but that doesn't really address my question.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 06:28 AM
  #7  
hybridreams's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =?? (Bnjmn)

It isn't meant to answer your question. Use it as a comparison.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 06:26 AM
  #8  
Bnjmn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Default Re: Too small of an intercooler =?? (Bnjmn)

Back from the dead...here is the answer to my original question in case it helps anyone-

The intercooler, if insufficient for your power levels, will manifest
it's problem in pressure drop, not high temperature. There are two things to
consider when matching a intercooler to a setup. Flow capability, and
efficiency. From what I have seen, almost all front mount ICs for the MKIV are
pretty good in efficiency. They range from superb to very good in this regard.
Flow capability is another story. The smaller ones will start to show a pressure
drop across the core at high airflows. No amount of cooling, water/methanol
injection will cure this. Pressure drop goes up exponentially to airflow once
you start to "push too far." You could be seeing 30psi in the manifold, but it
could be 35psi at the turbo. The turbo is working harder, robbing power, just to
overcome the resistance of the intercooler. If you "hit the wall" with a small
intercooler on a large turbo, methanol/water injection won't cure the problem.
If will help with any THERMAL deficiencies, but can't do a thing for FLOW.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
purpleh22
Forced Induction
6
Jun 26, 2009 10:15 AM
integracivic94
Forced Induction
4
Sep 4, 2006 10:08 AM
dnbruut
Forced Induction
4
Feb 28, 2005 02:06 PM
RICE POLICE SIP
Forced Induction
7
Feb 28, 2004 05:25 PM
phase12gsr
Forced Induction
7
Apr 23, 2002 01:18 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 AM.