missing link vs electronic map limiter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2002 | 12:50 PM
  #1  
schwett's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA, USA
Default missing link vs electronic map limiter

ok, here's a dumb one.

would you guys recommend a missing link, or an electronic map limiter to prevent the ECU from seeing boost? i have read the spiel at the missing link site about why it's so much better to use a mechanical valve, basically because a) you won't ever expose the stock map sensor to boost (big deal, it costs $40), and b) the atmospheric signal output by the sensor will vary with the actual atmospheric pressure.

i'm not sure that b) is really a good thing for me, given that i'll be using the PMS in relative correction mode (rather than the full standalone mode), which means it might be more consistent to have the fueling based on stock injector pulse width at x.xxv (2.8v, whatever) plus or minus the amounts specified in the boost tables.
Reply
Old May 15, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #2  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: missing link vs electronic map limiter (schwett)

electronic will be more consistent and reliable
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chrisfromsrq
Forced Induction
7
Sep 26, 2009 12:20 AM
nicktagz
Forced Induction
6
Sep 8, 2006 11:01 AM
l2yanE
Forced Induction
1
Oct 2, 2005 10:15 AM
CarpAngler
Forced Induction
2
Feb 4, 2005 05:30 AM
94greddycivic
Forced Induction
5
Jun 29, 2004 10:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 AM.