i made 419 whp with pump gas at 16 psi

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 19sec beast &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">On 100% pump gas, and no methanol/water injection, I made 490whp on my LS @ 19psi. The pump gas was 4 months old, too.</TD></TR></TABLE>
How much torque were you producing?

 

https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=8

 

I actually rememeber when this thread was first made. I was running my stock LS at 300 at the time...lol

"Back then they really wanted, now it's Hot were all on it"-A.Hobbs

400whp that is. that's the new 300whp

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HybridcivicLS-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I actually rememeber when this thread was first made. I was running my stock LS at 300 at the time...lol

"Back then they really wanted, now it's Hot were all on it"-A.Hobbs

400whp that is. that's the new 300whp</TD></TR></TABLE>

500whp is the new 300whp.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by espanol &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

500whp is the new 300whp. </TD></TR></TABLE>

What he said.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Teglove2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I really don't know why more turbo hondas arent utilizing water/meth injection. I know at our shop they have already been quite a few dsm's/srt-4's using it with great success. Most of the cars I've seen are making 25psi + on pump gas with it! We had a galant vr-4 make 28psi on pump gas and go 10.8........but just like andrea and jeff said you cant get even distribution to each cylinder.......yet. Before too long I think we'll see a good kit, the demand is definitely there.
Well to contribute to the actual post my ls did 373whp on pump gas(18psi) with only 11.8 degrees of advance. Tim Switzer was being very careful.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I've been thinking about this kit...

Seems pretty nice.

http://store.summitracing.com/...w=sku

 

well I made 604 whp and 425 wtq on 92 octane today. I still had to adjust a few points when the 4th gear decided to desintegrate.

so I have to go back another day for more fine tunning.

 

510whp 322 tq 92 techron with techroline

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by onefstek &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well I made 604 whp and 425 wtq on 92 octane today. I still had to adjust a few points when the 4th gear decided to desintegrate.

so I have to go back another day for more fine tunning. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Congrats Stefan, haha I remember 2 weeks ago when Josh told you at PR that there was noone with 600whp on pump gas, I think I saw a light bulb go off...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by onefstek &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well I made 604 whp and 425 wtq on 92 octane today. I still had to adjust a few points when the 4th gear decided to desintegrate.

so I have to go back another day for more fine tunning. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Seriously? Setup please?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HybridKOOP &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Seriously? Setup please?</TD></TR></TABLE>

From what I've seen in his posts it's an 84.5mm 9.5:1 GSR motor with a GT4088R.

 

84mm gsr w/ 9.5:1 cr. gt4088r. turbo manifold in my sig, homemade sheet metal Intake manifold, Apex-i Power Fc tunned.

 

Dyno sheet?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dyno sheet?</TD></TR></TABLE>

dyno sheet is comming, I have to upload some pics of the tranny and dyno sheet.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dyno sheet?</TD></TR></TABLE>

well here are some pics of the gears to keep you entertained untill I upload the dyno sheet.

 

and the dyno sheet.

keep in mind that I was just starting to tune high boost and it was only my 1st full run with high boost. 2.0 bar.

the duty on the boost controller still has to be adjusted, thats why the up and down in boost, and also the air/fuel has to be straighten out a bit more. lol



Last run was when the trany broke, so I had to stay up till 2:30 am and change the trany at the shop. But shiet happens, so im not upset at all.

 

Nice numbers man!, btu damn does that thing run lean, specially for the pwoer it's making

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice numbers man!, btu damn does that thing run lean, specially for the pwoer it's making</TD></TR></TABLE>

top end got a bit lean just about 13's but nothing too crazy.

 

Maybe a little more tuning and you'll be good. lol Do you start at low boost and work your way up, or just crank the **** and go for broke?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> just crank the **** and go for broke? </TD></TR></TABLE>

hahah, is there any other way

lol, but yea.. i have done a couple over 500hp on 93, the last one was 510hp/375tq at only 7200 rpms before the clutch completely blew up. 400-450 is fairly common here on NC gas (which is way better than anyother gas on the east coast i have seen)

We are designing my buddy's motor around pump gas... its goal is 600-650 on pump, lots of custom everything.

 

we made 462 whp on pump gas (93 octane shell v powa )
on my bone stock s2k (11:1 comp)

-James

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Maybe a little more tuning and you'll be good. lol Do you start at low boost and work your way up, or just crank the **** and go for broke? </TD></TR></TABLE>

I start at low boost and then increase as the a/f ratios are good to that point. than tune the a/f ratios again.

 

man that boost had some issues.....cool numbers but scary...lol

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by onefstek &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I start at low boost and then increase as the a/f ratios are good to that point. than tune the a/f ratios again. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Things happen linearly with boost, there should never been a situation where you make a high boost pass like that and the a/f ratio is that jacked up. If it was tuned at 10psi, and 15psi, then you can interpolate up and get the fuel very close. Either you tuned one row and didn't touch the rest, or just just cranked the boost up w/o tuning down low. I can't think of any other explanation of a fuel curve like that at that power level...