<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by st00pid &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My money is on..

Jordo leaves LA with AEM and returns with M4.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Now that's what i'm talking about! Get rid of the Almost Engine Management and put a real management system on it!

I can tune anything, it's just that some systems work better than others...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 68'superchargedLT1camaro &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The B18c5 is rated at 195 horse power at the crankshaft. Regardless of turbo charger size, if this kit is set up to produce 8 pounds of boost at redline, with a properly sized intercooler, and correct tuning this should produce around 290 horse power at the crankshaft. Front wheel power numbers will be even less due to drive train losses. This is a "ball park" figure, as their are many variables to be considered, but this is guaranteed to be closer than any others previosly posted.</TD></TR></TABLE>

WTF you talking about the "turbo charger size doesn't matter"?

Your saying he's only going to make 95 more horsepower to the crank???

Hahaha get lost Camaro boy

At least 320 WHP

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by st00pid &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My money is on..

Jordo leaves LA with AEM and returns with M4.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Sounds good to me. I know i would.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I can tune anything, it's just that some systems work better than others... </TD></TR></TABLE>

You can tune anything? I just took a big dump, come tune that for me

anyways, i wouldnt say one works better than the other (such as aem) some might be easier to tune than others....but you can make them all work just as good as any other....if you spend enough time on it that is....or if youre more efficient on one over the other.... or if you get your hands on a Mase Map, then you're all set

however, im not a big fan of aem's hardware related problems lately, ive had a couple take a ****....

P.S. my new interest is to learn the autronic system.... no body around here is baller enough to run one yet...

 

Actually, some systems DO work better than others. Try running a haltech and a motec with an identical setup and map. You will blow the motor with the haltech much quicker, guaranteed. Timing accuracy is very important if you're really makeing big power. Bob used to do alot of twin turbo testarossas and they used to use haltech on them. They would make about 700whp and they'd blow up at anything more than that. When they changed to motec they now make 860whp on pump gas and stay together. Ari from Rotary Performance said the same thing, he has to tune his car conservative to keep it together with the haltech, he just hasn't had time to install his M800.

 

Thats the reason we only make 699whp on the turbo 240s with haltech

 

Which computer are you gonna use on your 240?

 

NISDATA

Im still trying to figure out how to make the M4 fit into the stock ECU housing.

 

Anyone around here offer Fmu tuning?

I hear Art specializes in that field

 

itll prolly be more like 265-280