Bore VS spool time

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 23, 2003 | 10:50 AM

#26

15psi of fun

Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 505

Likes: 0

From: KC MO, MO, US

Re: Bore VS spool time (Boostfed)

So it’s the problem of not having the safety of reboreing if something happens. That is why every body thinks you should stay at 81mm but if you have darton sleeves can’t you replace one if it gets too damaged and you would have to go over 85mm.

Jul 23, 2003 | 12:03 PM

#27

93LSivic

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 5,608

Likes: 1

From: All around, De/Pa

Re: Bore VS spool time (EFrollingout)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFrollingout »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So it’s the problem of not having the safety of reboreing if something happens. That is why every body thinks you should stay at 81mm but if you have darton sleeves can’t you replace one if it gets too damaged and you would have to go over 85mm.</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is true. You can replace one Darton sleeve if needed. Thats a good reason to use them instead of GE. Pay more for Dartons, but you get what you pay for.

Jul 23, 2003 | 12:04 PM

#28

Boostfed

New User

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 12,296

Likes: 0

Re: Bore VS spool time (93LSivic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93LSivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

This is true. You can replace one Darton sleeve if needed. Thats a good reason to use them instead of GE. Pay more for Dartons, but you get what you pay for. </TD></TR></TABLE>
There are more reasons than that but I won't go into that again. See sig.