60-1 on d16z6
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jarvis199 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">21psi and and im running a act 6 puck unsprung with xxtreme pp </TD></TR></TABLE>
same clutch im running...man i hate that thing
same clutch im running...man i hate that thing
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jarvis199 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">21psi and and im running a act 6 puck unsprung with xxtreme pp </TD></TR></TABLE>
yup thats what i figured, those clutches dont like to disengage at any kind of high rpm.
yup thats what i figured, those clutches dont like to disengage at any kind of high rpm.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Garage 808 Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my disengages just fine at 10k idk what ur problems are</TD></TR></TABLE>
10k with a sohc using a extreme PP?
10k with a sohc using a extreme PP?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jarvis199 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mine does fine at high rpm </TD></TR></TABLE>
so your car wont shift over 7500 into second for what reason?
so your car wont shift over 7500 into second for what reason?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: catlettsburg, kentucky, usa
mine shifts fine, that other bloke said that his wont shift into 2nd at high rpm...
ive had a few that have done that tho, but this one seems good...
ive had a few that have done that tho, but this one seems good...
My Xtreme pressure plate on my k20 would not disengage either. Also cracked open my clutch master cylinder and it wore out to the rivets in 5k miles. I will never buy another product from them ever again. I now will stick with twin plates only.
We ran a 60-1 on a fully built SOHC for our PINK car, no matter what we did, we couldnt get the thing to make power. At 18 psi on a B sereis we normally see like 450+ whp. On the D we saw 280whp.
We put a smaller turbo on it woke up wayyy better and made a ton more power. Much happier and the powerband was killer
i recommend a gt2871R or gt30R...
We put a smaller turbo on it woke up wayyy better and made a ton more power. Much happier and the powerband was killer

i recommend a gt2871R or gt30R...
I run pretty much the same turbo and I make that power at only 13 psi on a D15B. Only has LS and Vitaras.
I also only have a 2 3/8 exhaust.
Sure there wasn't somethink wrong with that motor.
Just get a T3/T4 Stage 3, 0.48 A/R, 57 trim, 0.60 A/R.
It seams to be a very popular choice that works well. Depending on your power goals, you may elect to choose the 0.63 A/R turbine housing instead of the 0.48.
Good Luck.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: catlettsburg, kentucky, usa
just got done running a 2.5" full mandrel bent exhaust guys (me and a buddy ran it all out of summit racing mandrel bends) and it didnt seem to hurt spool time more than 100-200 rpms...
car is running great right now, after about 25-30 21psi full out butt rapings...
compression is still 155 all across, running strong, thinking of raising the boost since this turbo shouldnt be anywhere near letting the iat's go up at the moment, anyone have any experience on when a 60-1 starts heating the air up too much to use pump gas???
car is running great right now, after about 25-30 21psi full out butt rapings...
compression is still 155 all across, running strong, thinking of raising the boost since this turbo shouldnt be anywhere near letting the iat's go up at the moment, anyone have any experience on when a 60-1 starts heating the air up too much to use pump gas???
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phelpsj2
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
13
Jul 10, 2010 07:06 PM
1boostedcivic
Classifieds: Forced Induction
1
Oct 20, 2005 12:18 PM






