Two tweeters?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
I want to replace the front and rear speakers in my car, all 4 speakers are 6.5"
My JVC MP3 headunit is rated at 4x50, 19w RMS, 4 ohm and I've been trying to find speakers as close to that RMS as possible, since I learned it'll sound better the closer it is.
So far I've only been able to find a 3 way speaker at 30w RMS.
Now my question is this: my Skyline already has tweeters in my pillar, so would running a 3 way speaker, therefore giving me 4 front tweeters be a bad idea?
Modified by ryanstev at 1:38 PM 1/23/2005
My JVC MP3 headunit is rated at 4x50, 19w RMS, 4 ohm and I've been trying to find speakers as close to that RMS as possible, since I learned it'll sound better the closer it is.
So far I've only been able to find a 3 way speaker at 30w RMS.
Now my question is this: my Skyline already has tweeters in my pillar, so would running a 3 way speaker, therefore giving me 4 front tweeters be a bad idea?
Modified by ryanstev at 1:38 PM 1/23/2005
wow that really depends on the speaker... but im gonna say, in that low power range, that a coaxial speaker with 10 tweeters will probably work the same as 1.
For a skyline and all, Id like to really recommend a new Headunit, or at least a nice little amp for you. I guess I need more info.
For a skyline and all, Id like to really recommend a new Headunit, or at least a nice little amp for you. I guess I need more info.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ryanstev »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I want to replace the front and rear speakers in my car, all 4 speakers are 6.5"
My JVC MP3 headunit is rated at 4x50, 19w RMS, 4 ohm and I've been trying to find speakers as close to that RMS as possible, since I learned it'll sound better the closer it is.
So far I've only been able to find a 3 way speaker at 30w RMS.
Now my question is this: my Skyline already has tweeters in my pillar, so would running a 3 way speaker, therefore giving me 4 front tweeters be a bad idea?
Modified by ryanstev at 1:38 PM 1/23/2005</TD></TR></TABLE> Having more then one, [one per side] speaker producing the same freqency, [unless properly coupled] is not a good idea.
Its not so much the speaker RMS power, but the speakers efficiency that matters, you will find this in the speck sheet for the speaker , and will read something like this. 86dB 1watt 1 meter, 89dB 1watt 1 meter, 92dB 1watt 1 meter, the higher the dB the better, higher watt speakers are normaly less efficient, [ not always].
94
My JVC MP3 headunit is rated at 4x50, 19w RMS, 4 ohm and I've been trying to find speakers as close to that RMS as possible, since I learned it'll sound better the closer it is.
So far I've only been able to find a 3 way speaker at 30w RMS.
Now my question is this: my Skyline already has tweeters in my pillar, so would running a 3 way speaker, therefore giving me 4 front tweeters be a bad idea?
Modified by ryanstev at 1:38 PM 1/23/2005</TD></TR></TABLE> Having more then one, [one per side] speaker producing the same freqency, [unless properly coupled] is not a good idea.
Its not so much the speaker RMS power, but the speakers efficiency that matters, you will find this in the speck sheet for the speaker , and will read something like this. 86dB 1watt 1 meter, 89dB 1watt 1 meter, 92dB 1watt 1 meter, the higher the dB the better, higher watt speakers are normaly less efficient, [ not always].
94
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CooBlueDAB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow that really depends on the speaker... but im gonna say, in that low power range, that a coaxial speaker with 10 tweeters will probably work the same as 1.
For a skyline and all, Id like to really recommend a new Headunit, or at least a nice little amp for you. I guess I need more info.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It is a new headunit though, I got it only 9 months ago.
For a skyline and all, Id like to really recommend a new Headunit, or at least a nice little amp for you. I guess I need more info.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It is a new headunit though, I got it only 9 months ago.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fcm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Having more then one, [one per side] speaker producing the same freqency, [unless properly coupled] is not a good idea.
Its not so much the speaker RMS power, but the speakers efficiency that matters, you will find this in the speck sheet for the speaker , and will read something like this. 86dB 1watt 1 meter, 89dB 1watt 1 meter, 92dB 1watt 1 meter, the higher the dB the better, higher watt speakers are normaly less efficient, [ not always].
94</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks, I'll add that to the list of things I check for.
Its not so much the speaker RMS power, but the speakers efficiency that matters, you will find this in the speck sheet for the speaker , and will read something like this. 86dB 1watt 1 meter, 89dB 1watt 1 meter, 92dB 1watt 1 meter, the higher the dB the better, higher watt speakers are normaly less efficient, [ not always].
94</TD></TR></TABLE>Thanks, I'll add that to the list of things I check for.
yeah, about the headunit, it may work great, and be a good one, Ive just never heard anything good about JVC, in all honesty, I have actually heard people say JVC has no buisness making headunits. But I dont have experience with them, so I cannot say from experience.
This is a good link to check out.. LOTS of info, on everything I could ever think of.
http://www.bcae1.com/
This is a good link to check out.. LOTS of info, on everything I could ever think of.
http://www.bcae1.com/
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
I've gone ahead and got Pioneer TSG1615 twin cones for the front.

and TSG1645 2 ways for the rear.

They sound great and only took 3 1/2 hours to install.
I couldn't believe the condition of the rear speakers, the paper cone was so brittle after being in the sun for the last 10 years, and the rubber surround holding the cone to the metal frame of the speaker was totally missing for all four speakers.
Both are 130w max, 30w RMS, 92dB (1W/1m)
Modified by ryanstev at 1:27 PM 1/24/2005

and TSG1645 2 ways for the rear.

They sound great and only took 3 1/2 hours to install.
I couldn't believe the condition of the rear speakers, the paper cone was so brittle after being in the sun for the last 10 years, and the rubber surround holding the cone to the metal frame of the speaker was totally missing for all four speakers.
Both are 130w max, 30w RMS, 92dB (1W/1m)
Modified by ryanstev at 1:27 PM 1/24/2005
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ryanstev »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've gone ahead and got Pioneer TSG1615 twin cones for the front.

and TSG1645 2 ways for the rear.

They sound great and only took 3 1/2 hours to install.
I couldn't believe the condition of the rear speakers, the paper cone was so brittle after being in the sun for the last 10 years, and the rubber surround holding the cone to the metal frame of the speaker was totally missing for all four speakers.
Both are 130w max, 30w RMS, 92dB (1W/1m)
Modified by ryanstev at 1:27 PM 1/24/2005</TD></TR></TABLE>You should have put the 2ways in the front and the dual cones in the rear
94

and TSG1645 2 ways for the rear.

They sound great and only took 3 1/2 hours to install.
I couldn't believe the condition of the rear speakers, the paper cone was so brittle after being in the sun for the last 10 years, and the rubber surround holding the cone to the metal frame of the speaker was totally missing for all four speakers.
Both are 130w max, 30w RMS, 92dB (1W/1m)
Modified by ryanstev at 1:27 PM 1/24/2005</TD></TR></TABLE>You should have put the 2ways in the front and the dual cones in the rear
94
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fcm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You should have put the 2ways in the front and the dual cones in the rear
94</TD></TR></TABLE>
But I already have seperate tweeters in the front.
94</TD></TR></TABLE>But I already have seperate tweeters in the front.
its a rear fill thing, preference really. I used to not care, then I got it balanced, and it really does sound best.
So basically, in general, more sound up front seems to sound better. Putting tweets up front helps bring that image to the front.
IE. Do you sit with your back to the band in a concert?
So basically, in general, more sound up front seems to sound better. Putting tweets up front helps bring that image to the front.
IE. Do you sit with your back to the band in a concert?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RnEpmc
Audio / Security / Video
7
Aug 6, 2006 04:46 PM
Silver Surfer
Audio / Security / Video
5
Jul 13, 2006 09:44 PM




