difference between cable and hydrolic trannies?
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: difference between cable and hydrolic trannies? (86si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 86si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just how the clutch is operated,internals are basically the same </TD></TR></TABLE>
I concur.
I concur.
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: All Sales Final
Re: difference between cable and hydrolic trannies? (honda-tech)
depends what car you have. most 94 and up integras are hydro, 92 + civics/delsols are hydro. theres no difference in a cable or hydro b16 tranny aside from the way the clutch is engaged.
Mad Scientist
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,827
Likes: 1
From: tallafizzy, FL state
Re: difference between cable and hydrolic trannies? (Ch3mik)
internals are different between hydro/cable; unless you have a 92/93 ys1 wich was cable but had hydro internals on it.
synchros are different.
most cable tranny's had a smaller spline than hydro's.
thats all i can think of, but there is more.
synchros are different.
most cable tranny's had a smaller spline than hydro's.
thats all i can think of, but there is more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ldanphanl
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Mar 6, 2005 08:50 PM
