Cable VS Hydraulic
12-02-2004, 04:21 PM
#2
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Farmington, MN, USA
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Cable VS Hydraulic (DelSolKid)
The pro's are: If you have a hydrolic tranny, and a hydrolic clutch, it works great.
The con's are: If you have a hydrolic tranny, and a cable clutch, it doesn't work.
The con's are: If you have a hydrolic tranny, and a cable clutch, it doesn't work.
12-03-2004, 02:23 AM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Cable VS Hydraulic (BauleyCivic)
NEVER EVER use a conversion kit!!!!!!
they suck.....just go with what you car is designed for and leave it at that
it is called the KISS method
Keep
It
Simple
Stupid
they suck.....just go with what you car is designed for and leave it at that
it is called the KISS method
Keep
It
Simple
Stupid
12-03-2004, 05:34 AM
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: the OC
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Cable VS Hydraulic (DelSolKid)
one is old and one is new hydrolic is the new generation of trannys and i think newyer is better but then again if you cant afford it go with cable is cheaper but in the long run its all about hydro
12-03-2004, 05:48 AM
#6
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY, NY, USA
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Cable VS Hydraulic (DelSolKid)
With a hydro once your clutch is gone you must change it, With a cable via adjustment you can squeeze some more milage out of it. But as DIRTYSOL said deal with what you car came with, its not worth the effort to convert it. If you wanna pull more performance out of it, get a performance clutch and adjustments done.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ldanphanl
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
03-06-2005 08:50 PM
