Why not a BPV (bypass valve), instead of a blow off valve?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
Deam's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default Why not a BPV (bypass valve), instead of a blow off valve?

Can u use a BPV instead of a BOV in a D16 turbo setup? I do not want the sound of a BOV, but most of the kits only have BOV's and make no mention of a BPV, unless I have the terms all wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
Bailhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 1
From: ME
Default Re: Why not a BPV (bypass valve), instead of a blow off valve? (Deam)

You can do it but it makes a simple thing unnecessarily complex. There is no need to recirculate the compressed air with a MAP based system.

I do understand not liking the sound though. I got a 1st gen DSM bypass valve that I run to atmosphere, essentially a BOV. It is pretty quiet and not nearly as annoying as a type S or a TXS HRFL. it's a good compromise i think and the DSM valve is plenty adequate for under 15 psi.

Unless you have a long intake on your turbo and/or an air box you will still hear a bypass valve too. 1g DSM for $30 owns you!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #3  
Del_Slowest's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: springboro, oh, USA
Default Re: Why not a BPV (Bailhatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bailhatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 1g DSM for $30 owns you!</TD></TR></TABLE>


Same price i payed for mine, DSM rocks. Its the classic Whoosh without being super loud like the HKS SSQ
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #4  
Bailhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 1
From: ME
Default Re: Why not a BPV (Del_Slowest)

i paid less but thats usually what they go for. Yup woosh, all air no high pitched stuff. I'm pretty sure you can only hear mine in the car BTW
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #5  
filthy scarecrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis, MN, murka
Default

bypass valves open (some partially, some fully) under vacuum conditions too. make sure you have a filter on it.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 09:11 PM
  #6  
tjbizzo's Avatar
Screw you guys, I'm... going... home.
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
From: lovely Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (filthy scarecrow)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by filthy scarecrow &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bypass valves open (some partially, some fully) under vacuum conditions too. make sure you have a filter on it. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Why would you want to have a filter on it? It is air that has already been filtered and it is just going back into the compressor intake.

Anywho, I agree with not wanting to hear that BOV PFFFFFFFTTTT sound. Allow me to enlighten you with a simple formula. BPV = functional, BOV = Stunna, yO!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 09:43 PM
  #7  
CRX-RX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
From: Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Default Re: (tjbizzo)

Yup. You can do it, no huge benefit and not required, but will work fine. On a side note, I'll probably be recirculating a type S on my D series turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #8  
filthy scarecrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis, MN, murka
Default Re: (tjbizzo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tjbizzo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Why would you want to have a filter on it? It is air that has already been filtered and it is just going back into the compressor intake.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

bypass valves don't *have* to be recirculated. i thought he was talking about using somehting like the OEM MR2 valve on a honda and venting it to atmos. in that case, you want a filter on it because it opens completely when you're just cruising. if you recirculate it, obviously there's no filter needed.

the BPV will also help your off boost throttle response.
if you're just looking to get rid of the BOV sound, just recirculate whatever valve you use to the intake. it'll pretty much muffle it.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #9  
Deam's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default Re: (filthy scarecrow)

The purpose of a BPV vs. a BOV for me was purely acoustics, and not any performance differences.

If a BOV can be made to not have the sound it makes, then that would work.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 12:07 PM
  #10  
uranazo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Northern, VA, USA
Default

ok, im just a newbie to turbos so bear with me, but i thought the purpose of a BOV was to release excess boost ... therefore if u put a BPV in there wouldnt it not release the boost at the correct pressure? or what?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 12:25 PM
  #11  
kpt4321's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH, USA
Default Re: (uranazo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by uranazo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok, im just a newbie to turbos so bear with me, but i thought the purpose of a BOV was to release excess boost ... therefore if u put a BPV in there wouldnt it not release the boost at the correct pressure? or what?</TD></TR></TABLE>


A BPV is just a BOV that vents back to the intake pipe BEFORE the turbo.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
soon to be boosted ZC
Forced Induction
1
Nov 14, 2006 05:49 PM
boondockgtr
Forced Induction
3
Dec 26, 2003 05:05 AM
__37__
Forced Induction
10
Sep 4, 2003 06:31 PM
civicdragon
Forced Induction
4
Dec 25, 2001 07:37 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM.