N/A vs turbo costs vs power

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 7, 2006 | 07:23 AM

fsufan716

Thread Starter

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Apex, NC, Wake

N/A vs turbo costs vs power

would it be better to sell low power engine for a n/a set up or boost low power set up to reach like 320 hp i would be using ehtier a b18 type r if not boosted or the k20 for boost please help

Jun 7, 2006 | 07:45 AM

cambopheonix56

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 3,529

Likes: 0

From: Iowa

Re: N/A vs turbo costs vs power (fsufan716)

Its going to be easier to reach 320 with boost.

Jun 7, 2006 | 08:49 AM

project_hatch1.8

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 505

Likes: 0

From: WA

Re: N/A vs turbo costs vs power (cambopheonix56)

so you're debating between a n/a itr or a boosted k20? not much to think about as long as money isnt an issue

Jun 7, 2006 | 11:04 AM

wicked2night

Junior Member

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 514

Likes: 0

From: Europe, slovenia

Re: N/A vs turbo costs vs power (civicbhatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civicbhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so you're debating between a n/a itr or a boosted k20? not much to think about as long as money isnt an issue</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm with this man.

Are you sure you didn't mean to boost the type R and do the NA work on the K20? Either way, i'd say go turbo. It's easyer to make power.