What turbo?
I know you guys get a lot of these questions, but I am not en engine guy. . . I can design my own suspensions, but engine are really foreign to me.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know you guys get a lot of these questions, but I am not en engine guy. . . I can design my own suspensions, but engine are really foreign to me.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know how you bored that out to 1.8L.
I am building a b16a, bored out to 1.8 liters, stock cams, ferrea valve train, 1mm oversized valves, 8.5 pistons, darton sleezes, micropolished crank. So a pretty heavily built engine, what turbo should I get if I want 250 daily driven and like 500 at the track with pump gas. I need a turbo that can be driven on the street, but also that can handle the 500hp. Thanks for the help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know how you bored that out to 1.8L.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, it's sleeved, so if he's running a stock 77mm crank and bored it to 86mm, then he'd be about 1.8, of course his cylinder walls might be a bit thin.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah i dont think i would go any bigger then 85mm on a turbo motor.
Yeah i dont think i would go any bigger then 85mm on a turbo motor.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, it's sleeved, so if he's running a stock 77mm crank and bored it to 86mm, then he'd be about 1.8, of course his cylinder walls might be a bit thin.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Even 86 is a bit short of 1.8. I think he may have been thinking of 84mm sleeves, and thinking that 84mm on 1.8 = 2.0, even though it = 1.93 on a GSR, and thinking 84mm will add .2L of displacement to his B16
Even 86 is a bit short of 1.8. I think he may have been thinking of 84mm sleeves, and thinking that 84mm on 1.8 = 2.0, even though it = 1.93 on a GSR, and thinking 84mm will add .2L of displacement to his B16
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I figured 1.79 was close enough to call it a 1.8, but I think you're right, he's got an 84 or 85mm bore and hasn't done the math.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't even know if his sleezes could hold an 86mm bore
I don't even know if his sleezes could hold an 86mm bore
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It started out as a b16, it is bored out to almost 1.8 liters, not quite. Darton sleeves are much stronger than stock.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So what bore is it?
84mm takes you to a little bit over 1.7 litres, and anything more than that really isn't the best choice for turbo.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So what bore is it?
84mm takes you to a little bit over 1.7 litres, and anything more than that really isn't the best choice for turbo.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vamz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It started out as a b16, it is bored out to almost 1.8 liters, not quite. Darton sleeves are much stronger than stock.
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Did you check out the links I posted in that thread?
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...s.htm
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...2.htm
And that link didn't really help all that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Did you check out the links I posted in that thread?
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...s.htm
http://www.turbosaturns.net/ar...2.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TealCivic115
Forced Induction
6
Aug 27, 2011 03:27 PM
DRKSol
Tech / Misc
5
Apr 17, 2004 10:18 PM





