NOTE:

NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!!

------------------------------------------------

K20A2
9:1
Cybernation turbokit
T3/04
750cc
16psi, pump gas

AC and HI/LO boost switch are in the glovebox :wink:






Here is a 100% stock 2002 RSX-S on the same dyno for comparison:

 

Wow, looks like you're making quite a bit more power than stock there. Can you be a little more specific about your turbo? What are expecting w/ higher boost? Nice numbers by the way.

 

Whats wrong with the 2002 RSX-S? Its only making 138 hp!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by joe_bocc &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whats wrong with the 2002 RSX-S? Its only making 138 hp!</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NOTE: NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

that could be why.

 

what kind of dyno? no matter what dyno for only making 327whp@16psi that is pretttty bad. I made 330whp@10psi, on a dyno jet but none the less. 327whp@16psi is a lot of booost for those low numbers

 

stick it on a dynojet at the same place you dynoed and see the numbers they will be a lot higher than what you had on Jack's dyno. Yeah jack's dyno has been known to give out lower numbers than others but it doesnt really matter if you are going to him for tuning his dyno gives out the same numbers consistantly. I put down 166 I think it was on my NA eg then put it on a dyno here for a dyno day and made 195 almost 30whp difference just from switching dynos but still jack's tuning from his dyno. HP on a dyno is just a number anyways......

 

Remember, all dyno's are different. but the graph should be the same,

 

Those look like Mustang Dyno printouts. If that is the case, the general rulel of thumb is to add 13% to the numbers to get dynojet numbers.

That gives 370 whp on a dynojet.

Also, boost pressure does not dircetly affect power numbers as a big turbo at 10 psi can make more power than a small turbo at 15 psi.

 

Yes, a Mustang Dyno

 

Those look low for the amount of boost.

 

Those look low for the amount of boost.


Reading is fundamental...........

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those look low for the amount of boost.


Reading is fundamental...........</TD></TR></TABLE>

you must get sick of trying to get through to them sometimes. . .

Let's try this for the people who don't get it.

<U>THOSE DYNO PLOTS ARE FROM A MUSTANG DYNO WHICH GIVES LOWER #'S THAN A DYNOJET OR A DYNAPACK. NOBODY CARES IF YOUR CAR MADE HIGHER #'S THAN THAT ON A DYNOJET OR ANYTHING ELSE.</U>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Accel Junky &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those look low for the amount of boost.</TD></TR></TABLE>


haha

 

Jack, how many CN kits have you tuned now? whats your opinion on the kit??
Tom

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes, a Mustang Dyno</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those numbers are still low for a Mustang Dyno (base run). I went with a bunch of guys and we did a Mustang Dyno and one guy with just a CAI was at like 175.

 

post some pix of the car.

 

god theres a ton of retards in this forum...look at the plot of the stock rsx for comparison. thats good power for jacks dyno, trust me

 

the reason he showed the stock rsx-s numbers was to show you how far off the dyno is from a dynojet, if it made 138, then i bet the turbo numbers would eb up near 350-360... regardless, torque does seem a little low

can u be more specific on the motor? 9:1comp, how?
and exhaust?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">god theres a ton of retards in this forum...look at the plot of the stock rsx for comparison. thats good power for jacks dyno, trust me</TD></TR></TABLE>

agreed... i wish they would obtain some knowledge before posting... or at least ask questions instead of assuming or stating misinformation

 

can u be more specific on the motor? 9:1comp, how?
and exhaust?


Lower comp pistons (customer didn't know the brand)

3 inch DP with Greddy SP2 cat-back (nice and quiet )

 

I'll do the math for the reading impaired on here, or those who can't grasp the concepts of diff dynos...

His car made 138hp stock on this dyno and we'll say a "normal" dyno car makes about 160 stock. Thats 116% more than the mustang dyno. His turbo setup on the mustang made 327hp, so as a correctional factor to the "normal" dyno, we'll multiply by 1.16 (or 116%). This gives us 380hp correct to the so called "normal" dyno. Impressive numbers in my opinion especially with the small greddy exhaust.