2003 RSX-S Turbo (AEM EMS, Uego, etc...) dyno plots
05-04-2005, 06:31 AM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
2003 RSX-S Turbo (AEM EMS, Uego, etc...) dyno plots
NOTE:
NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!!
------------------------------------------------
K20A2
9:1
Cybernation turbokit
T3/04
750cc
16psi, pump gas
AC and HI/LO boost switch are in the glovebox :wink:
Here is a 100% stock 2002 RSX-S on the same dyno for comparison:
NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!!
------------------------------------------------
K20A2
9:1
Cybernation turbokit
T3/04
750cc
16psi, pump gas
AC and HI/LO boost switch are in the glovebox :wink:
Here is a 100% stock 2002 RSX-S on the same dyno for comparison:
05-04-2005, 10:40 AM
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbia, South Caroliina, Richland
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, looks like you're making quite a bit more power than stock there. Can you be a little more specific about your turbo? What are expecting w/ higher boost? Nice numbers by the way.
05-04-2005, 12:44 PM
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2003 RSX-S Turbo (joe_bocc)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by joe_bocc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whats wrong with the 2002 RSX-S? Its only making 138 hp!</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NOTE: NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
that could be why.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NOTE: NOT DYNOJET NUMBERS!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
that could be why.
05-05-2005, 07:31 AM
#5
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SOUTH, FL, US
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what kind of dyno? no matter what dyno for only making 327whp@16psi that is pretttty bad. I made 330whp@10psi, on a dyno jet but none the less. 327whp@16psi is a lot of booost for those low numbers
05-05-2005, 07:34 AM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: at home
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (rsx0Nb0o0st)
stick it on a dynojet at the same place you dynoed and see the numbers they will be a lot higher than what you had on Jack's dyno. Yeah jack's dyno has been known to give out lower numbers than others but it doesnt really matter if you are going to him for tuning his dyno gives out the same numbers consistantly. I put down 166 I think it was on my NA eg then put it on a dyno here for a dyno day and made 195 almost 30whp difference just from switching dynos but still jack's tuning from his dyno. HP on a dyno is just a number anyways......
Trending Topics
05-05-2005, 04:15 PM
#8
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (flatblkCR-X)
Those look like Mustang Dyno printouts. If that is the case, the general rulel of thumb is to add 13% to the numbers to get dynojet numbers.
That gives 370 whp on a dynojet.
Also, boost pressure does not dircetly affect power numbers as a big turbo at 10 psi can make more power than a small turbo at 15 psi.
That gives 370 whp on a dynojet.
Also, boost pressure does not dircetly affect power numbers as a big turbo at 10 psi can make more power than a small turbo at 15 psi.
05-07-2005, 06:05 AM
#12
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: at the track
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2003 RSX-S Turbo (B18CXr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those look low for the amount of boost.
Reading is fundamental...........</TD></TR></TABLE>
you must get sick of trying to get through to them sometimes. . .
Let's try this for the people who don't get it.
<U>THOSE DYNO PLOTS ARE FROM A MUSTANG DYNO WHICH GIVES LOWER #'S THAN A DYNOJET OR A DYNAPACK. NOBODY CARES IF YOUR CAR MADE HIGHER #'S THAN THAT ON A DYNOJET OR ANYTHING ELSE.</U>
Reading is fundamental...........</TD></TR></TABLE>
you must get sick of trying to get through to them sometimes. . .
Let's try this for the people who don't get it.
<U>THOSE DYNO PLOTS ARE FROM A MUSTANG DYNO WHICH GIVES LOWER #'S THAN A DYNOJET OR A DYNAPACK. NOBODY CARES IF YOUR CAR MADE HIGHER #'S THAN THAT ON A DYNOJET OR ANYTHING ELSE.</U>
05-08-2005, 08:08 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2003 RSX-S Turbo (743power)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Accel Junky »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those look low for the amount of boost.</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha
haha
05-09-2005, 04:50 AM
#15
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Evanston, IL, USA
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2003 RSX-S Turbo (B18CXr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes, a Mustang Dyno</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those numbers are still low for a Mustang Dyno (base run). I went with a bunch of guys and we did a Mustang Dyno and one guy with just a CAI was at like 175.
Those numbers are still low for a Mustang Dyno (base run). I went with a bunch of guys and we did a Mustang Dyno and one guy with just a CAI was at like 175.
05-10-2005, 12:21 PM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Casey)
the reason he showed the stock rsx-s numbers was to show you how far off the dyno is from a dynojet, if it made 138, then i bet the turbo numbers would eb up near 350-360... regardless, torque does seem a little low
can u be more specific on the motor? 9:1comp, how?
and exhaust?
can u be more specific on the motor? 9:1comp, how?
and exhaust?
05-10-2005, 12:24 PM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Casey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">god theres a ton of retards in this forum...look at the plot of the stock rsx for comparison. thats good power for jacks dyno, trust me</TD></TR></TABLE>
agreed... i wish they would obtain some knowledge before posting... or at least ask questions instead of assuming or stating misinformation
agreed... i wish they would obtain some knowledge before posting... or at least ask questions instead of assuming or stating misinformation
05-13-2005, 04:33 AM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (tallblondkid)
can u be more specific on the motor? 9:1comp, how?
and exhaust?
Lower comp pistons (customer didn't know the brand)
3 inch DP with Greddy SP2 cat-back (nice and quiet
)
and exhaust?
Lower comp pistons (customer didn't know the brand)
3 inch DP with Greddy SP2 cat-back (nice and quiet
)
05-13-2005, 10:41 AM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (B18CXr)
I'll do the math for the reading impaired on here, or those who can't grasp the concepts of diff dynos...
His car made 138hp stock on this dyno and we'll say a "normal" dyno car makes about 160 stock. Thats 116% more than the mustang dyno. His turbo setup on the mustang made 327hp, so as a correctional factor to the "normal" dyno, we'll multiply by 1.16 (or 116%). This gives us 380hp correct to the so called "normal" dyno. Impressive numbers in my opinion especially with the small greddy exhaust.
His car made 138hp stock on this dyno and we'll say a "normal" dyno car makes about 160 stock. Thats 116% more than the mustang dyno. His turbo setup on the mustang made 327hp, so as a correctional factor to the "normal" dyno, we'll multiply by 1.16 (or 116%). This gives us 380hp correct to the so called "normal" dyno. Impressive numbers in my opinion especially with the small greddy exhaust.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
