b16 vs gsr cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #1  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default b16 vs gsr cams

Yes I know this has been talked about alot, but I promise its a slightly different question

For my turbo setup im looking for 450+ whp and revving to about 8500 on ITR valvtrain and supertech valves.

Now my question is which cams will be able to flow the best up to 8500 rpms, and would switching to gsr cams net more than say 5 whp?

I can get a pair for a decent price, but want to make sure its really worth the price. Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
project dc2's Avatar
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,428
Likes: 0
From: 43257 Osgood Rd. Fremont, CA 94539
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (95GSRTT)

gsr cams are better than B16 you can find a 20-30 WHP increase by using ITR"s
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #3  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (project dc2)

well are they better for more of a mid to lower power or will they make more power up top also?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 06:09 AM
  #4  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (95GSRTT)

bump for an answer of the actual question at hand
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #5  
deftones0817's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
From: camden, de, usa
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (95GSRTT)

im running ctr cams in my car and i tell you what ask anyone that thing moves. I think ctr/itr are the way to go. Gsr are ok too and are cheaper.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #6  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (deftones0817)

ya i know all about how much more the itr cams will make, but i dont really want to spend another 250 on itr/ctr cams. Only reason I would switch to gsr cams from b16 cams is b/c i can get a pretty good deal on them.

So pretty much im wondering if the b16 or gsr cams will be able to hold power the longest up top? and by how much more the gsr cams really make over the b16s in general?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
4-banging's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: Texas, USA
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (95GSRTT)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95GSRTT &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ya i know all about how much more the itr cams will make, but i dont really want to spend another 250 on itr/ctr cams. Only reason I would switch to gsr cams from b16 cams is b/c i can get a pretty good deal on them.

So pretty much im wondering if the b16 or gsr cams will be able to hold power the longest up top? and by how much more the gsr cams really make over the b16s in general?</TD></TR></TABLE>

spend the extra cash and tell us. . .I'm sure you won't be disappointed
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #8  
95GSRTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (4-banging)

bump it up for an answer
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
integlspwr2k's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,318
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (95GSRTT)

i herd the automatic b16 cams are even better then the GSR ones.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #10  
hpfsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 1
From: PACNW
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (integlspwr2k)

I've never heard that... gsr cams have a bit more lift on the intake side and more duration on both sides than b16a cams which seems to yield gains over stock without changing the characteristics of the motor in terms of powerband etc... itr's have even more lift and duration and push the sweet spot a bit further up the rpms depending on your engine's specifics. Any upgrade over b16's should be an improvement, I went with gsr's because they are readily affordable/available and have good hp-per-$ yields since I don't plan on taking this motor over 8500rpm.

Civic Si(1999 Spec)
Int-265 dur. / 10.5mm lift
Exh-267 dur. / 9.6mm lift

Integra GS-R
Int-274 dur. / 10.7mm lift
Exh-276 dur. / 9.6mm lift

Civic Type-R And Integra Type-R(Integra Type R 2000/01 Spec)
Int-278 dur. / 11.5mm lift (97-98 spec = 3 deg less duration)
Exh-280 dur. / 10.5mm lift
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #11  
integlspwr2k's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,318
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (hpfsi)

its one of those things were its kept hush hush and not like u come across alot of automatic b16 cams anyways..

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hpfsi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've never heard that... gsr cams have a bit more lift on the intake side and more duration on both sides than b16a cams which seems to yield gains over stock without changing the characteristics of the motor in terms of powerband etc... itr's have even more lift and duration and push the sweet spot a bit further up the rpms depending on your engine's specifics. Any upgrade over b16's should be an improvement, I went with gsr's because they are readily affordable/available and have good hp-per-$ yields since I don't plan on taking this motor over 8500rpm.

Civic Si(1999 Spec)
Int-265 dur. / 10.5mm lift
Exh-267 dur. / 9.6mm lift

Integra GS-R
Int-274 dur. / 10.7mm lift
Exh-276 dur. / 9.6mm lift

Civic Type-R And Integra Type-R(Integra Type R 2000/01 Spec)
Int-278 dur. / 11.5mm lift (97-98 spec = 3 deg less duration)
Exh-280 dur. / 10.5mm lift </TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
hpfsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 1
From: PACNW
Default Re: b16 vs gsr cams (integlspwr2k)

dude don't let the word out about the auto b16 cams... we have to maintain an edge somehow
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvanM1
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
18
Jun 9, 2010 09:41 PM
staindgd
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
5
Jan 28, 2008 06:28 PM
blackcrx16
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Jun 19, 2007 10:39 AM
CRX11Z
Forced Induction
4
Apr 12, 2007 02:05 AM
ShAAdiiiNG
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
18
Jan 10, 2003 05:18 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 AM.