Hybrid / Engine Swaps Discussions about non-stock engine swaps into Honda cars. This is not a forum for hybrid gas/electric cars.

b16a with ctr cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2002 | 09:06 PM
  #1  
b18c-93's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default b16a with ctr cams

i have a b16a1 in my 93 integra i was wondering if i could put the ctr cams in with my stock springs with stock computer
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #2  
SpeedracerS4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, OR
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (93gsb16a)

yes it'll work with your stock valvetrain, just dont rev it pass 8k
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #3  
hybrider's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (SpeedracerS4)

you`ll be fine, just done raise that redline, cuz revvin past 8k wont be that fun in the end
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2002 | 11:02 PM
  #4  
rice_classic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (hybrider93)

you`ll be fine, just done raise that redline, cuz revvin past 8k wont be that fun in the end
Why? is it because of the valve springs?? if you did an ITR valve train on a b16a with the ctr cams could you rev past 8k?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 01:27 AM
  #5  
hybrider's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (rice_classic)

well if you do plan to raise the redline itr outters would be just what ya need and maybe some stiffer inners, and you should be more than ok to rev past 8k so your ITR cams can peak out.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 03:59 AM
  #6  
JD_B18CDX's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: DE, USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (93gsb16a)

Another thing to consider is compression ratio.
If ctr engine has a much higher comp ratio than your integra, bigger flowing cams (like the ctr) MIGHT not work as expected on your engine.
Bigger cams will have more valve overlap and will loose some cyl presure on an engine not designed to work with it. Higher comp engines compensate for this by having high comp ratio.

Your engine will run.... just MIGHT (not saying it wont work) not work as expected.

Just some thought.


Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
rice_classic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (johnd)

Ok.. so that spawns another question. Since the CTR intake cam is slightly more aggressive than the ITR intake and it is designed for the CTR engine would it be better to have the ITR intake and exhaust cams or the CTR Intake and the ITR exhaust with all ITR springs?? Or should I leave the original b16a intake springs in because I've heard they are a bit stiffer than the ITR intake springs?? If someone could clear the air on this one I would be most grateful
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 04:12 PM
  #8  
SpeedracerS4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton, OR
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (rice_classic)

Or should I leave the original b16a intake springs in because I've heard they are a bit stiffer than the ITR intake springs??
whoever told you that its on crack! type r have stiffer valve springs compare to b16
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 04:22 PM
  #9  
hybrider's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (SpeedracerS4)

Speedracer,
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2002 | 04:59 PM
  #10  
B16CRX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (rice_classic)

would it be better to have the ITR intake and exhaust cams or the CTR Intake and the ITR exhaust
The only difference is the intake cam. The exhaust cams are identical. And, I believe it is only a 3 degree difference on the intake cams. So there would not be that much of a difference between the two.

ITR springs are deffinately stiffer than the B16A. If you want to get the cams and rev high, I would also get the springs and retainers with them. Of course thats just my opinion of how I would want to do it. Do it all at once the first time so you don't have to worry about it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 04:28 AM
  #11  
JD_B18CDX's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: DE, USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (rice_classic)

I think you are missing the point. I'll try to clarify.

Valve overlap is when both intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time. You want this overlap because at higher revs, the inertia of the intake and exhaust gasses helps the engine breathe. The intake pulse pushing the air in the intake manifold toward the cyls and the exhaust pulse pulling air out of the cyl.
This will only happen when if the gasses are moving fast enough like when the engine is screaming at 5000-8000 rpms.

On a simple engine........(no vtec, no variable valve timing etc)
Normally, you want a certain amount of presure in the cylinders to get good torques and HP. Less aggressive cams will create good cyl pres with an engine with a moderate compression ratio ( say 9.8:1) because they do not have much valve overlap.
At low rpms, extended time the intake valve is open actually make you loose cyl presure because piston is already on its way to compression stroke and intake valve is still open. Well.... this pushes the intake gases out the cylinders again. At high rpms, the gases are moving fast enough that it gives then engine a "longer" intake stroke (sucking air and fuel) by letting the inertia of the intake gasses "ram" itself inside the cylinders.

Now for your example.......
If you try to put an aggressive cam (say a ctr or itr) on an engine not built for it, the valve overlap on the cams would make ur engine idle roughly and loose drivability at low rpms because

1. Engine does not pull enough vacum to atomize the air fuel mixture (remember intake stroke is being cancelled by the upward movement of the piston during compression stroke because intake valve still open)
2. Not enough cyl presure during power stroke because not much air fuel was burned therefore making less power and torque.


Bottom line is you cant just slap on an aggressive cam to an engine that does not have a comp ratio to match it. You loose overall drivability and there is a chance you might actually loose HPs at higher rpms.

I hope this info helps.
It would suck to get all hyped about a new toy only to find out its not working as expected.

>would it be better to have the ITR intake and exhaust cams or the CTR Intake >and the ITR exhaust with all ITR springs??


[Modified by johnd, 8:36 AM 2/19/2002]
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 04:32 AM
  #12  
HKxBlur's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, CA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (johnd)

this is so very true as a rule and you've got the explanation down pat, however in this case it's not an issue.. It'll work absolutely fine and as expected with the lower compression motor.. Depending on year/model there's a 0.6-0.4:1 ratio difference between the A1 and the B, but there's been plenty of guys quite happy with the setup.. I recommend NOT using the stock springs, although they will work fine, but I personally don't like to half-*** stuff, that's all.. The stock springs will work under 8k just fine, but i still recommend cheap itr springs..


[Modified by HKxBlur, 1:38 PM 2/19/2002]
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 04:20 PM
  #13  
rice_classic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (HKxBlur)

JohnD and HKxBlur: thank you so much for the explanations!! When people respond in such a manner I learn a great deal and it makes me very glad I asked the question.. I am going to do a b16a1 with ITR Springs and retainers and a CTR/ITR (whatever's cheaper)intake cam and ITR exhaust cam..

Without your response I NEVER would have taken CR into consideration when upgrading cams. Maybe I can find someone with an ITR intake manifold with springs and cams as a package!!!! Either way.. thank you much!


[Modified by rice_classic, 1:21 AM 2/20/2002]
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2002 | 07:41 AM
  #14  
Chris_'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Chi City.
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (rice_classic)

Good thread. I also have a b16 and am looking at similar setups. Since CR may be an issue, would it also be beneficial to throw some CTR pistons into the b16 block (to bump up the CR)? Also, how high could i rev with the ITR valvesprings (8400 rpms)? What aftermarket valvesprings would allow for a higher redline (but still be safe)?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 01:28 AM
  #15  
nfn15037's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA, USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (johnd)

I think you are missing the point. I'll try to clarify.

Valve overlap is when both intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time. You want this overlap because at higher revs, the inertia of the intake and exhaust gasses helps the engine breathe. The intake pulse pushing the air in the intake manifold toward the cyls and the exhaust pulse pulling air out of the cyl.
This will only happen when if the gasses are moving fast enough like when the engine is screaming at 5000-8000 rpms.

On a simple engine........(no vtec, no variable valve timing etc)
Normally, you want a certain amount of presure in the cylinders to get good torques and HP. Less aggressive cams will create good cyl pres with an engine with a moderate compression ratio ( say 9.8:1) because they do not have much valve overlap.
At low rpms, extended time the intake valve is open actually make you loose cyl presure because piston is already on its way to compression stroke and intake valve is still open. Well.... this pushes the intake gases out the cylinders again. At high rpms, the gases are moving fast enough that it gives then engine a "longer" intake stroke (sucking air and fuel) by letting the inertia of the intake gasses "ram" itself inside the cylinders.

Now for your example.......
If you try to put an aggressive cam (say a ctr or itr) on an engine not built for it, the valve overlap on the cams would make ur engine idle roughly and loose drivability at low rpms because

1. Engine does not pull enough vacum to atomize the air fuel mixture (remember intake stroke is being cancelled by the upward movement of the piston during compression stroke because intake valve still open)
2. Not enough cyl presure during power stroke because not much air fuel was burned therefore making less power and torque.


Bottom line is you cant just slap on an aggressive cam to an engine that does not have a comp ratio to match it. You loose overall drivability and there is a chance you might actually loose HPs at higher rpms.

I hope this info helps.
It would suck to get all hyped about a new toy only to find out its not working as expected.

>would it be better to have the ITR intake and exhaust cams or the CTR Intake >and the ITR exhaust with all ITR springs??


[Modified by johnd, 8:36 AM 2/19/2002]
Good points, but ITR or CTR cams are really fairly mild. The small lobe isnt big enough to worry about idle problems(kinda the whole reason we have VTEC), so no worries about that. Also, on a motor that has 10:1 compression, these cams will be fine, again, they are really pretty mild cams. The USDM ITR only has 10.6:1. Just some food for thought.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 10:58 AM
  #16  
HyperREV's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: kelowna, BC, Canada
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (SpeedracerS4)

whoever told you that its on crack! type r have stiffer valve springs compare to b16
i've heard that as well actually.. dont R's have lighter valves as well, requiring a softer spring?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 12:01 PM
  #17  
nfn15037's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA, USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (HyperREV)

whoever told you that its on crack! type r have stiffer valve springs compare to b16

i've heard that as well actually.. dont R's have lighter valves as well, requiring a softer spring?
That is wrong. The valves are a couple grams lighter, this coupled with the stiffer springs allow the ITR to rev to 8400 in the US and the JDM ones revlimiter isnt till close to 9k. The ITR valvesprings also have an ovel cross section to prevent binding. The Realtime Type Rs rev to 9200 on completely stock ITR valvetrsin, try that with B16 valvesprings.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 06:12 PM
  #18  
GokuSSJ4's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 1
From: .....
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (johnd)

get ctr intake and itr exhaust (every bit counts for N/A)
use itr intake outters (all around) and portflow inners ) if you plan to rev high !
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 06:49 PM
  #19  
hybrider's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (Spoon1)

wow some great information, anyone want to archive this one?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 09:18 AM
  #20  
crxfactor1991's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: pamplico, sc, usa
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (93gsb16a)

how high do you plan on revving with your stock teg computer?

the computer wont let you see the sweet spot on the ctr cams, so in essence, your valvesprings will be fine
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 12:12 PM
  #21  
nfn15037's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA, USA
Default Re: b16a with ctr cams (Spoon1)

get ctr intake and itr exhaust (every bit counts for N/A)
use itr intake outters (all around) and portflow inners ) if you plan to rev high !
Portflow inners with ITR outers can rev to 9200, and they are not super stiff like toda or JUNs so they wont have to be replaced as often
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03EM2guy
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
28
Nov 16, 2011 11:13 AM
bl1tzk1213g
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
4
Jan 29, 2008 06:56 AM
Dammit_Dan_954
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
8
Nov 22, 2003 12:27 PM
SiRex91
Tech / Misc
3
Nov 24, 2002 10:49 PM
SilentFury
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Feb 9, 2002 06:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:07 PM.