thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe
04-20-2006, 08:00 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe
wondering how some people with h22 ek's like the swap? thinking about it for my skivik yay or nay? hp? handling? weight?
04-21-2006, 01:33 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 13.9 at 101.76mph, 2420lbs, FL, USA
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe (dan89crxsi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dan89crxsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wondering how some people with h22 ek's like the swap? thinking about it for my skivik yay or nay? hp? handling? weight?</TD></TR></TABLE>
*sigh*
HP, it's 200hp stock, 195 USDM, 220 Type-S.
Handling, Just fine for ANYTHING you do on the street with stock suspension.
Weight, My car weighed 2550 with no a/c, no p/s.
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by michaeg6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">torque is ok, not enough high end power, not unless you change pistons and cams, engine is heavy so you need to compensate it with good suspension for it to handle good.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Just shut up. Torque = daily drivability. Engine weighs between 30-60lbs more than a b-series depending on the variants and options you have.
Here is a link to my garage. https://honda-tech.com/garage?cmd=viewcar&id=1565
*sigh*
HP, it's 200hp stock, 195 USDM, 220 Type-S.
Handling, Just fine for ANYTHING you do on the street with stock suspension.
Weight, My car weighed 2550 with no a/c, no p/s.
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by michaeg6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">torque is ok, not enough high end power, not unless you change pistons and cams, engine is heavy so you need to compensate it with good suspension for it to handle good.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Just shut up. Torque = daily drivability. Engine weighs between 30-60lbs more than a b-series depending on the variants and options you have.
Here is a link to my garage. https://honda-tech.com/garage?cmd=viewcar&id=1565
04-21-2006, 01:39 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Re: thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe (DarkKnight1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DarkKnight1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
https://honda-tech.com/garage?cmd=viewcar&id=1565</TD></TR></TABLE>
Tose must be some crazy boltons you have. From my experience it is pretty hard to get that kind of H22 power (>195/150) without cams. Got Dynos?
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
https://honda-tech.com/garage?cmd=viewcar&id=1565</TD></TR></TABLE>
Tose must be some crazy boltons you have. From my experience it is pretty hard to get that kind of H22 power (>195/150) without cams. Got Dynos?
04-21-2006, 01:46 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Re: thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe (92'si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92’si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">h22 is cool.... but you have to hack up the bay for it to go in. Thats really the only downside.</TD></TR></TABLE>HE is asking about EK. Read up yo.
04-21-2006, 10:11 PM
#7
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: danville, ca, usa
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: thinking about h22 in my 99 ex coupe (DarkKnight1)
[QUOTE=DarkKnight1]
*sigh*
HP, it's 200hp stock, 195 USDM, 220 Type-S.
Handling, Just fine for ANYTHING you do on the street with stock suspension.
Weight, My car weighed 2550 with no a/c, no p/s.
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
Just shut up. Torque = daily drivability. Engine weighs between 30-60lbs more than a b-series depending on the variants and options you have.
with all respect. sorry if my statement came out wrong.my point of view is in terms of tracking it. ive owned a h22 in my eg6. hella fast on straight. but if you wish to drive it on corners, you have to compensate it by installing good suspesion. weight wise. 30-60 pounds heavier is a lot when tracking . its a different story if its daily driven. h22 are quick no doubt. installing it maybe a bitch. i cut my shifter box for the linkage to fit, tight in the engine bay, before instaling it, i suggest you change what you have to change in your tranny coz it would be a head ache when you pull tranny out once engine is braced in the car.
*sigh*
HP, it's 200hp stock, 195 USDM, 220 Type-S.
Handling, Just fine for ANYTHING you do on the street with stock suspension.
Weight, My car weighed 2550 with no a/c, no p/s.
I put down just shy of 200whp and 155lb-ft with boltons.
Just shut up. Torque = daily drivability. Engine weighs between 30-60lbs more than a b-series depending on the variants and options you have.
with all respect. sorry if my statement came out wrong.my point of view is in terms of tracking it. ive owned a h22 in my eg6. hella fast on straight. but if you wish to drive it on corners, you have to compensate it by installing good suspesion. weight wise. 30-60 pounds heavier is a lot when tracking . its a different story if its daily driven. h22 are quick no doubt. installing it maybe a bitch. i cut my shifter box for the linkage to fit, tight in the engine bay, before instaling it, i suggest you change what you have to change in your tranny coz it would be a head ache when you pull tranny out once engine is braced in the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post