Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2005, 05:26 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
T3hMetalGear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons

Hey everybody,

I have a question about my Engine.

How much am I able to attach to my Vehicle before it puts too much strain on the crankshaft. Im about to add a Cold air, Exhaust, and Possibly Headers, and I wanted to know how much more I can attach safely before having to replace the Pistons, Crankshaft, and related parts with their performance quality counterparts.

Thanks for understanding, and please be positive about this.

-Tay
Old 08-31-2005, 05:44 AM
  #2  
Will you make something up for me please?
 
shamoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons (T3hMetalGear)

You are nowhere near the amount where you need to replace the pistons/crankshaft/rods/etc. Basically right now, with those listed modifications, you are just freeing up the existing power your engine is already making. You are making it flow better.

Unless you are creating lots of EXTRA power by adding nitrous, a turbocharger, supercharger, etc, you won't need to worry about the structural integrity of your internals.
Old 08-31-2005, 06:23 AM
  #3  
Member
 
91civicDXdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, MO, USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

since you have a 95, im guessing its a d16z6 (god forbid its a 1.5L)... your block should handle about 300 horsepower at the crank in the most extreme case.

with the mods you listed, you're probably making somewhere in the neighborhood of 130horsepower at the crank
Old 09-01-2005, 04:39 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
T3hMetalGear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons (T3hMetalGear)

Right, Im getting about 130 or so to the wheels, and it does seem to just move a lot easier than when I purchased it stock.

On a side note, Its SO wierd driving my car for so long and then going out in an IS 300. I was not expecting that change at all.
Old 09-01-2005, 05:02 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Sleepy_Red_hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vanier, On, Canada
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons (T3hMetalGear)

only need to upgrade internals if you want to go forced induction, spray or if you want to make more power or compression
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls_on_boost
Forced Induction
22
10-09-2011 04:29 AM
michaelprice83
Hybrid / Engine Swaps
3
02-16-2011 05:56 PM
GsrIntegra789
Forced Induction
12
01-07-2010 01:34 PM
DLB1994
Forced Induction
2
06-11-2002 06:35 AM
TeggerLS
Tech / Misc
8
03-12-2002 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: Structural Integrity of Stock 95 Crankshaft/Pistons



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM.