Which motor is better for boost and cheaper?
02-07-2008, 12:38 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Being A Stallion in, Maine, USA
Posts: 3,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (mcvtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mcvtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
x2
</TD></TR></TABLE>x2
02-07-2008, 12:58 PM
#4
Man U FTW
What are your power goals?? If you're looking for something around 300whp, i would rather pick the GSR because its a factory built engine and IMO more reliable for that reason. I made 315whp on 91 octane on my stock GSR.
02-07-2008, 07:13 PM
#7
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (roachsboosted16)
Im still in the blue as to why GSR, LSv and CRv are in the poll for a "cheaper" and "better" boost application?
At least take the LSv and CRv out of the picture and start by adding a few more stock Honda/Acura set ups like a B18b perhaps.
At least take the LSv and CRv out of the picture and start by adding a few more stock Honda/Acura set ups like a B18b perhaps.
Trending Topics
02-08-2008, 01:42 AM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (95ProjectEJ1)
Id go with GSR out of these options, but IMO you should broaden your options. Look at some more stock engines.
02-08-2008, 05:28 AM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: olathe, ks, us
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (96hb)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96hb »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">None of those are gonna be cheap, so your poll sucks. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you mean which is cheaper out of the three, or in general.
Cuz this poll sucks if you are looking for a cheap motor in general. nothing on that list is 1800 for the longblock, i wouldn't consider that real cheap.
Do you mean which is cheaper out of the three, or in general.
Cuz this poll sucks if you are looking for a cheap motor in general. nothing on that list is 1800 for the longblock, i wouldn't consider that real cheap.
02-08-2008, 05:36 AM
#12
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (Probot)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Probot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no more "what motor is better for boost" threads...</TD></TR></TABLE>
...in the Civic forum.
...in the Civic forum.
02-08-2008, 05:38 AM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Which motor is better for boost and cheaper? (mcvtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Probot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no more "what motor is better for boost" threads in the civic forums 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
better?
</TD></TR></TABLE>better?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post