civic_luvr

ive heard great things about the cx and vx but which one is better?im thinking about getting one but which one is worthy in both power and parts possible and could i get a turbo in either one?please people help me out.

hybridreams

CX is lighter

dohcsideSi

both the same car except w/ the vx the car is already wired for vtec (VTEC-E), you get some ugly wheels and the interior is not blue. vx

17secondcivic

in 92 all civic hatches were wired for vtec on the ecu side of things

VTECVillain

Are you buying one in hopes to make power with the stock motor or do you plan on doing a swap? To be honest the VX is better overall than a CX. The VX is 92hp 16 valve while the CX is 70hp 8 valve. The VX has a 1.5 VTEC-E motor, light alloy wheels and cloth interior. The CX will most likely have vinyl seats, steelie wheels and a weak 1.5 8 valve. The factory curb weight for both cars is the same, although some places will say that the VX is slightly lighter. Either one is good if you're going to do a motor swap but I think the VX is a better choice no matter what you plan to do.

blacksheep

Yeah, what he said.

Dorikamu

First of all CX and VX has to the same weight

CX interior doesnt have to be blue

but VX is a better car. on the otherside if you are swap everything, including interior, then it's doesnt matter, just get the cheapest you can find..

Mike K

92 CX
*wired for VTEC
*no sound deadening in the back
*no moldings
*no rear wiper

Not sure about the VX. I got my CX for $1600.00 so I'm a happy camper.

Combine that w/ a CRVTEC putting 212 and 143 to the wheels and it makes for a fun little car!

TURBOHB

The vx is lighter than the cx by about 44 lbs. And if you're getting it to do a swap the vx is wired for vtec already,has the egr vlave, and has a tach.

9KRacer

VX has no :

Sound deadning material
No body moulding
Rear wiper


[Modified by 9KRacer, 12:20 PM 4/10/2002]

Dorikamu

according to https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=150315

and carpoint.com VX and CX has the same weight

RR98DX

though this was funny...(i have no life)



*my server is down, so it might not show up*


[Modified by 95CivicSi, 12:48 PM 4/10/2002]

gsrvx

Just don't get an Si.

-rod

RR98DX

owen_the_soyboy

CX = yumminess.
I got TWO!

but the VX has the trick-mod-yet-oem underbody pans that provide better aerodynamics at the rear bumper... not that that is any good reason to buy a VX though

B18C5-EH2

Okay, I see a lot of posts about vehicle weight and the differences between the various CX, VX, DX, and Si models.
I'd like to set this **** straight so nobody else is confused.

First of all thanks to Shawn Hayes here on H-T for hooking me up with the 1992 Civic sales brochure, which had all the specs for every 1992 Honda Civic available, meaning hatchbacks and 4-doors only since the coupe wasn't offered until 1993.

Anyways, here go the base weights as measured by Honda in 1992:

1992 Honda Civic:

CX hatchback: 2094lbs.
VX hatchback: 2094lbs.
DX hatchback: 2178lbs.
Si hatchback: 2326lbs.

So that's the weights of each vehicle STOCK.

Notice the exact same weight for both the CX and VX? This should dispell those "VX is the lightest" arguments. In fact, in theory would you not think the CX would be even lighter since the VX had light-*** alloy 13 inch wheels while the CX had heavy-*** steel wheels? This would leave me to believe a few different things:

Body for body (which matters more because you swap out the wheels anyways, I mean 13'' wheels, come on!) I think this may mean the CX is lighter still. The only thing I can think that would make the VX the sane weight but has much lighter wheels might be that the VTEC-E motor weighs more than the CX 8-valve motor.

Another thing is the gas tanks.

CX and VX has a 10 gallon tank, while the DX and Si have the 11.9 gallon tank. Keep in mind these specs are striaght from Honda, so regardless how much gas you've squeezed in your CX, VX, DX, or Si it dosn't matter. Honda probably only measures TANK volume, not the filler and what's already in the fuel lines, etc.

So you also see that the DX is 84lbs. more than the CX/VX. Why would this be? Here's what I came up with:

Bigger fuel tank - tank is steel, so bigger = heavier
Rear wiper/washer
More tar - seen it myself. DX has more tar than the CX/VX.
Side moldings - plastic, but still weighs more than the non-existent side moldings on the CX/VX
Rear cargo cover std. it weighs something, right?

That just might be the difference. Things like the cargo cover and tar, rear washer/wiper can be deleted to get closer to CX/VX, so it's not a huge deal.

You also see that the Si is one heavy PIG compared to it's other hatchback brothers.

One more hilarious thing here for you guys with Si hatches that say "coupes are heavy, that's why I have a hatch" which I see often, and used to say myself.

How's this strike you:

1992 Civic 4-door with manual tranny:

DX 4-door: 2275lbs.
LX 4-door: 2319lbs.

Why did I bold the LX 4-door weight?

Because it has power windows, doorlocks, cruise control, power steering, etc. and is STILL lighter than the Si hatchback! So what do you think of the coupes now? If the 4-door is lighter, what about the 2-door coupes? The DX coupe is a good deal lighter than the Si hatchback.

Don't get all pissy if you own an Si - I used to have one, but after getting beaten by others in CX, VX, and DX hatches with less whp I sold it to build up a CX hatchback.

So, does anyone else on H-T here have this kind of info on the 1994-1995 hatchbacks? I know they weigh more because they added another airbag in 1994-1995, and some Si hatches came with ABS too. All that **** adds weight.

One last thing to keep in mind here:

These cars were weighed BONE STOCK.

This means:

No A/C - was NOT std. on any hatchback in 1992
No radio - again radios were NOT std. on ANY hatches in 1992
Only Si had 2 mirrors std. Add the weight of a mirror if you got 2 on your CX/VX/DX
ONLY the Si had powersteering - the DX auto did too, but I didn't list that one. I listed the manual, which had no p/s
Stock wheels. VX had lightweight 13'' alloys, CX/DX had 13'' steels, Si had heaviest 14'' steelies with wheel covers

So think about all those things that we can take out of our cars to get the weight down. This gives you a basic idea of what your car should weigh with no A/C, p/s, etc.

Also think about what ADDS weight to your car. Stereo, SWAP, bigger brakes, swaybars, bigger wheels, strut bars, etc. So don't think your 1992 CX weighs 2094lbs. if you have 2 mirrors, A/C, radio, SWAP, etc. You might be over the stock weight.

rodrez.

Whatever you decide, don't get an SI hatch, I have one. I'm using a 94 GSR rebuilt w/ITR pistons, CTR cams, 4-1 header, Skunk manifold, ITR throttle body, and other goodies, dyno'd 180.1 w/127lbs, and my friends with less power are pulling away in their cx/vx hybrids, it sucks! Just driving their cars at a normal speed, you can feel the difference in weight when you accellerate.

vntperformance

well in that case, how much do the 95 Cx's weigh?

vnt

B18C5-EH2

1994 and 1995 hatches all had dual airbags. That can only add weight, but how much? I don't know...