The Official EF Discussion Thread
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KraziCivicSi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">snow touches montgomery for the first time in years today... </TD></TR></TABLE>
i'm really sorry to hear about your luck. hopefully things will be looking up for you soon enough.
i hate snow.
i'm really sorry to hear about your luck. hopefully things will be looking up for you soon enough.
i hate snow.
That's crazy! I'm assuming there's a different chip installed for the emissions tune? There's no way that thing would pass California visual inspection, though
http://youtube.com/watch?v=QHqRVqPQD-8
why I keep building my car and will probably never sell it
...unless I decide to buy a house
when is the next buttonwillow event??
why I keep building my car and will probably never sell it
...unless I decide to buy a house
when is the next buttonwillow event??
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr_CRX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">There's no way that thing would pass California visual inspection, though
</TD></TR></TABLE>
What do u mean, that intake manifold and the venting of crankcase fumes to the atmosphere all looks OEM to me.
</TD></TR></TABLE>What do u mean, that intake manifold and the venting of crankcase fumes to the atmosphere all looks OEM to me.
I just read the writeup on the Endyn site. Those numbers are from an engine dyno (in case anyone thought it was making that much to the wheels). I believe it put down about 275whp when he dyno'd the car.
Such a great buildup, though! I wish i had the time and tools to fabricate a lot of the things he's doing.
Such a great buildup, though! I wish i had the time and tools to fabricate a lot of the things he's doing.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr_CRX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I believe it put down about 275whp when he dyno'd the car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr_CRX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just read the writeup on the Endyn site. Those numbers are from an engine dyno (in case anyone thought it was making that much to the wheels). I believe it put down about 275whp when he dyno'd the car.
Such a great buildup, though! I wish i had the time and tools to fabricate a lot of the things he's doing.</TD></TR></TABLE>
very good.
i sat and read it all last night. it made 275 at almost 9800 rpms with a 95mm crank in a dart tall deck block thats been c ompletely worked over by larry himself.
best part of the build page:
"passport jdm was mad when they found out i was painting their hood."
hahahahaha
Such a great buildup, though! I wish i had the time and tools to fabricate a lot of the things he's doing.</TD></TR></TABLE>
very good.
i sat and read it all last night. it made 275 at almost 9800 rpms with a 95mm crank in a dart tall deck block thats been c ompletely worked over by larry himself.
best part of the build page:
"passport jdm was mad when they found out i was painting their hood."
hahahahaha
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bury Your Dead »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
very good.
i sat and read it all last night. it made 275 at almost 9800 rpms with a 95mm crank in a dart tall deck block thats been c ompletely worked over by larry himself.
best part of the build page:
"passport jdm was mad when they found out i was painting their hood."
hahahahaha</TD></TR></TABLE>
HT: What's the magic stroke number?
LW: I've built a few different combinations at 92mm and I think that is the right number. With a custom length Crower rod and matching crank, we still get a good rod ratio that'll keep side loading down and should spin past 9,000. Using a tall-deck block allows us to use a longer rod, so friction and associated wear will be low for a Honda engine of this size.
very good.
i sat and read it all last night. it made 275 at almost 9800 rpms with a 95mm crank in a dart tall deck block thats been c ompletely worked over by larry himself.
best part of the build page:
"passport jdm was mad when they found out i was painting their hood."
hahahahaha</TD></TR></TABLE>
HT: What's the magic stroke number?
LW: I've built a few different combinations at 92mm and I think that is the right number. With a custom length Crower rod and matching crank, we still get a good rod ratio that'll keep side loading down and should spin past 9,000. Using a tall-deck block allows us to use a longer rod, so friction and associated wear will be low for a Honda engine of this size.
these guys play with compression height/wristpin location so much that they an compensate. ive been playing around with numbers and i have found (and no i am not the first to find it) that you can move the wristpin up on a set of pistons with the same 89mm stroke, use a longer rod, and get close to a B16 rod ratio on an 85x89 motor. you have to use the 85mm piston though because the valve pockets arent so close to the edge of the piston so you can move the rings higher without getting into the valve pockets. make sense? i used a crayon and a napkin.
even with the 211.4mm dech height?
cause even with the tall dart block
ESP (eagle rod) make a special rod to use with the B20(B18B) crank and the B20+ block! The rod is 5.531'' long and a B18B(B20) crank is 3.504'' (89mm) So 5.531/3.504=1.578
B20+ block with 89mm crank = 1.578 rod ratio!
cause even with the tall dart block
ESP (eagle rod) make a special rod to use with the B20(B18B) crank and the B20+ block! The rod is 5.531'' long and a B18B(B20) crank is 3.504'' (89mm) So 5.531/3.504=1.578
B20+ block with 89mm crank = 1.578 rod ratio!



