DA Integra's Only
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Deano_D »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
your tire is on backwards
</TD></TR></TABLE>your tire is on backwards
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Giovannie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
nice!! i never seen that back bumper jdm perhaps? but im thinking of getting a cf hatch for my da i wonder how that would look on a captiva blue, damn rust under my acura emblem is getting worse, im wondering if its cheaper to fix my hatch or jsut replace it with cf
</TD></TR></TABLE>
there's no difference between the japanese and U.S. bumpers... those are EF9 rear fog lamps...
nice!! i never seen that back bumper jdm perhaps? but im thinking of getting a cf hatch for my da i wonder how that would look on a captiva blue, damn rust under my acura emblem is getting worse, im wondering if its cheaper to fix my hatch or jsut replace it with cf
</TD></TR></TABLE>there's no difference between the japanese and U.S. bumpers... those are EF9 rear fog lamps...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mIkEwItHtHeDA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there's no difference between the japanese and U.S. bumpers... those are EF9 rear fog lamps... </TD></TR></TABLE>
yea the only difference is the weight
yea the only difference is the weight
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JOSEPH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
heres an old pic
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I love it, you've always had the decal on that bumper?
heres an old pic
</TD></TR></TABLE>I love it, you've always had the decal on that bumper?
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,344
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue/NE, Dallas/TX, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by projectTeG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
something new for us DA guys from jdmshit.com. DA's are coming along way
lol, no modding needed they are for our model cars. i might pick a set up</TD></TR></TABLE>
Call for Pricing lol
something new for us DA guys from jdmshit.com. DA's are coming along way
lol, no modding needed they are for our model cars. i might pick a set up</TD></TR></TABLE>
Call for Pricing lol
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dforce »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">IMO That would look better with JDM 1pc. headlights. 

</TD></TR></TABLE>
Definitely... 200% better. Nice fitment.


</TD></TR></TABLE>
Definitely... 200% better. Nice fitment.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by simple DB2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i wanna see more companies make exhaust (like the BC Spec II) and more suspension setups.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i know i just saw that on the skunk2 website that they now make a exhaust for the 90-93 tegs.
i know i just saw that on the skunk2 website that they now make a exhaust for the 90-93 tegs.
90DA9IntegraRS-
i just read your sig, and not to sound like an ***, but you really should edit the 90DA9 has some knowledge thing.... kinda sounds like you are bragging that someone thinks your smart or something... not trying to be a dick, just IMO you should remove that...
i just read your sig, and not to sound like an ***, but you really should edit the 90DA9 has some knowledge thing.... kinda sounds like you are bragging that someone thinks your smart or something... not trying to be a dick, just IMO you should remove that...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92LSVTEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">90DA9IntegraRS-
i just read your sig, and not to sound like an ***, but you really should edit the 90DA9 has some knowledge thing.... kinda sounds like you are bragging that someone thinks your smart or something... not trying to be a dick, just IMO you should remove that...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It annoys you THAT much, huh?
i just read your sig, and not to sound like an ***, but you really should edit the 90DA9 has some knowledge thing.... kinda sounds like you are bragging that someone thinks your smart or something... not trying to be a dick, just IMO you should remove that...
</TD></TR></TABLE>It annoys you THAT much, huh?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by projectTeG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yea the only difference is the weight</TD></TR></TABLE>
there's no difference in the weight of the bumper cover... but there is a huge difference in the weight of the bumper supports...
if that's what you meant then you're right...
yea the only difference is the weight</TD></TR></TABLE>
there's no difference in the weight of the bumper cover... but there is a huge difference in the weight of the bumper supports...
if that's what you meant then you're right...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mIkEwItHtHeDA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there's no difference in the weight of the bumper cover... but there is a huge difference in the weight of the bumper supports...
if that's what you meant then you're right...</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what i meant our bumpers arent removable with the support still on the car like the DC and EG chassis. so to me the support and cover are one.
if that's what you meant then you're right...</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what i meant our bumpers arent removable with the support still on the car like the DC and EG chassis. so to me the support and cover are one.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GrayT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It annoys you THAT much, huh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
well, i read it and thought... "hmmm, this guy must think a lot of himself" so i assumed that other people may have read it and thought the same thing.. i guess that should have been a PM and not a post. my bad
well, i read it and thought... "hmmm, this guy must think a lot of himself" so i assumed that other people may have read it and thought the same thing.. i guess that should have been a PM and not a post. my bad



