You believe in that dyno #?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 08:46 AM
  #1  
austrian type-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
Default You believe in that dyno #?

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=398099
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 09:32 AM
  #2  
LS-hatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (austrian type-R)

i dont know about the 756 ft/lbs of TQ, I assume thats just a mistake.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
Boltz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
From: Tri Cities Diddy, IL
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (austrian type-R)

im not going to say that is impossible, but i dont believe it. lol, since when do the JRSC's make that kind of power... does anyone remember how many WHP aem's rsx got? (the one with nitrous) cybernation motorsports claims 310 whp with a turbo and 10 psi *i think*... if it is true to JRSC

the main word here is FISHY
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #4  
avividmemory's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,209
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, IN
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (Civic420)

Torque units printed in wheel not flywheel torque. Divide the numbers by 5.028 and you will find peak torque is 169 ftlb at 7000 rpm. Torque from 5500-8500 rpm is substantial.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
austrian type-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (SpoolinLS)

We are talking about 24hp per pound of boost. I guess only a hand full of turbos here are making that kind of power out of 1 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #6  
MotorMatrix.com's Avatar
I am a bad person
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (LS-hatch)

i dont know about the 756 ft/lbs of TQ, I assume thats just a mistake.
if you read all the way down it says

"Torque units printed in wheel not flywheel torque. Divide the numbers by 5.028 and you will find peak torque is 169 ftlb at 7000 rpm. Torque from 5500-8500 rpm is substantial." thats cause it uses a dyna pack one on each wheel not a regular roller dyno.


[Modified by MotorMatrix.com, 2:52 PM 1/30/2003]


[Modified by MotorMatrix.com, 11:08 PM 1/30/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 10:49 AM
  #7  
swrdply400mrelay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: Texas, US
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (MotorMatrix.com)

if you read all the way down it says

"Torque units printed in wheel not flywheel torque. Divide the numbers by 5.028 and you will find peak torque is 169 ftlb at 7000 rpm. Torque from 5500-8500 rpm is substantial." thats cause it uses 4 dyna packs on each wheel not a regular roller dyno.
That explains A LOT.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
Spunkster's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 2
From: Thats my one
Default Re: You believe in that dyno #? (austrian type-R)

The dyno numbers are real, I witnessed the dyno pull. Part of the reason for the higher numbers are the good flow design of the head. The other reason is that Jackson has reworked the blower case to be about 15% more efficient.

I bet if i were to get better headers on my ITR i could be making close to 250hp since i was able to make 236hp at 7psi.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StolenTeg
Forced Induction
6
Sep 26, 2010 12:04 PM
fastvtecCL
Drag Racing
33
Dec 24, 2005 05:08 AM
Full-Race Geoff
Forced Induction
85
Nov 17, 2005 04:35 PM
JDMchris
Acura Integra
11
Aug 24, 2002 10:50 AM
ArcticFreeze
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
21
Sep 6, 2001 08:15 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 PM.