V-AFC or S-AFC
07-17-2001, 04:20 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: las vegas, nv, usa
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
V-AFC or S-AFC
Recently I decided to get 310s but I heard that the car will run rich under these injectors. I was thinking of buying either unit to control it and make it more stoich. What unit should I buy?, is there a difference between them?
07-17-2001, 04:25 PM
#3
New User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: san luis obispo, ca
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: V-AFC or S-AFC (revhrdls)
I ran ran 310s with no electronic compensation and there were no problems; when the car is running closed-loop it automatically adjusts. You may want to drop your baseline/static fuel pressure a bit, but mine had NO problems being too rich. Too lean, on the other hand...
As for the Apex stuff, the diff between the two is that the V-AFC has VTEC control built in and gives you the ability to build a fuel adjustment map for low throttle/high throttle and low cam/high cam (four maps) instead of just low throttle/high throttle (two maps) on the S-AFC.
At least that's how I understand it.
As for the Apex stuff, the diff between the two is that the V-AFC has VTEC control built in and gives you the ability to build a fuel adjustment map for low throttle/high throttle and low cam/high cam (four maps) instead of just low throttle/high throttle (two maps) on the S-AFC.
At least that's how I understand it.
07-17-2001, 09:12 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: V-AFC or S-AFC (revhrdls)
I have 310's in my car right now with no piggy back controllers, it runs fine. I just lowered the rise rate in my FMU to 8:1.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IgniteTeg
Acura Integra
3
04-25-2002 11:25 PM