turbonetics/fmax or rev hard
02-04-2005, 06:34 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairfax, va, usa
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
turbonetics/fmax or rev hard
im looking for turbo kits for my integra and i was wondering which one of the kit is better and more reliable the rev hard or the turbonetics/fmax?
02-04-2005, 06:54 AM
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: turbonetics/fmax or rev hard (andr3w150)
If you plan on running the kit out of the box I'd say Revhard would be better then the FMAX. The Revhard has better parts like the wastegate for example (RH = TIAL, FMAX = turbonetics). And even though the FMU setup is not the best out there, it's still better then the FMAX additional injector setup.
BTW I think you should have done a little more research by searching through the forced induction archives. This thread will probably end up getting locked, because I think it's against the FI TOS.
BTW I think you should have done a little more research by searching through the forced induction archives. This thread will probably end up getting locked, because I think it's against the FI TOS.
02-04-2005, 08:27 AM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA, USA
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if your looking for good fitment go with a greddy kit, i've had the fmax kit before, the mf2 injector crap is just a waste of money, not really any software to tune or control it, really not user friendly
the fmax kit you can also get the option for a tial gate instead of a deltagate
at this point anything is better than the mf2, i would even go with the fmu before i ever use that mf2 crap
the fmax kit you can also get the option for a tial gate instead of a deltagate
at this point anything is better than the mf2, i would even go with the fmu before i ever use that mf2 crap
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
