Once again another noob question....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
Vinhtran17's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Pleasanton, CA, U.S
Default Once again another noob question....

Im soon runnin a turbo on my stock ls internals.... now the question is.... if i was to run turbo... should i have 2.25 piping for the exhaust? or a 3? now i know you guys are prolly gonna say " GO SEARCH you noob" or sumtin, but i have, and couldnt find what i was looking for....(if you guys can find the thread, come slap me and link me the thread.... thanks...) anywayz for those who want to tell me here.... i would like to know what diameter should i have? 2.25? or 3? oh yeah im runnin 6 -7 psi for now.... daily driven.... thanks allot for those that helped me towards my turbo...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
redboost10's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Default Re: Once again another noob question.... (Vinhtran17)

the biggest you can fit is the best choice
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
Johnyquest's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek, OH 45431
Default Re: Once again another noob question.... (tgh99si)

2.5" becomes a limitation around 300whp or so, and you will always spool faster with a 3". It's up to you. I had a 2.5, so I left it. It works, but If I had to do it again, 3" all the way.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #4  
wickedEFguy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Emo land, Utah, USA
Default Re: Once again another noob question.... (Johnyquest)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Johnyquest &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2.5" becomes a limitation around 300whp or so, and you will always spool faster with a 3". It's up to you. I had a 2.5, so I left it. It works, but If I had to do it again, 3" all the way.</TD></TR></TABLE>
um no, larger piping will cause you to have less resistance and less exhaust pressure for build up so you will spool slower. bad part about 2.5" is that once you pass a certain flow rate you start to lose power. 3" is a good for mid to higher boost but for low boost and a faster spooling turbo stick with 2.5"
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #5  
Vinhtran17's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Pleasanton, CA, U.S
Default

bump
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #6  
tegmech's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Viaka Heaven
Default Re: Once again another noob question.... (wicked B16)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wicked B16 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
um no, larger piping will cause you to have less resistance and less exhaust pressure for build up so you will spool slower. bad part about 2.5" is that once you pass a certain flow rate you start to lose power. 3" is a good for mid to higher boost but for low boost and a faster spooling turbo stick with 2.5"</TD></TR></TABLE>

how does that work??? If you have more back pressure then why would the turbo spin faster, seems a bit backwards to me. And besides, doesn't a majority of the spooling characteristics come from the design of the manifold. With less backpressure the exhaust can allow the manifold to do what is was designed to do. Maybe i am wrong on this so correct me somone if i am wrong.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dointhemzs
Forced Induction
2
Dec 4, 2008 04:46 AM
DC-4-Drew
Forced Induction
5
Oct 3, 2005 08:52 AM
HuskerHybrid
Forced Induction
6
May 14, 2004 11:02 AM
Rhythm Racer
Forced Induction
6
Mar 3, 2003 10:24 AM
NaVamous
Forced Induction
2
Aug 20, 2002 10:19 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 PM.