non-intercooled turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:10 AM
  #1  
JDMallTHEway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: FL, USA
Default non-intercooled turbo

what is the highest psi you can run with a non-intercooled turbo setup?

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:17 AM
  #2  
tjbizzo's Avatar
Screw you guys, I'm... going... home.
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
From: lovely Raleigh, NC
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

The answer to that question depends on many many factors but the number I most often hear here on H-T is about 6psi. The BIG question is...why would you boost a car without intercooling it??? They're relatively cheap, not too hard to install, and add lots of power and reliability. Why wouldn't someone do it?!?!
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:17 AM
  #3  
Scean's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Newnan, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

0

but seriously i guess it depends on the motor, and the tune, good tune and a strong motor probobally a decent amount i wouldnt personally go over like 5psi tho

much smarter to stay on the safe side tho, u can get a dsm sidemount IC for cheap, as a matter of fact i happen to be selling one so if ur interested let me know
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:15 AM
  #4  
JDMallTHEway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: FL, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

this may sound silly, but i'm looking to keep my oem fog lights, and all the front mount intercoolers I have seen require you to take them off for the piping. Would I be able to with the side mount? I also want to keep a bit of a sleeper look, which is hard to do with a big *** intercooler up front.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:27 AM
  #5  
braintree's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

To be honest, intercooler > foglights for so many reason; most importantly, air temp.

Edit: there are numerous people who have got large intercoolers with foglights. Just takes some creative fabbing. Alsp, to answer your question, I would not go over 5 psi depending on tuning and your turbo.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #6  
99_Ek9's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: M Town, OH, US
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

I just installed a Greddy type 24 on my 99 Hatch and I have OEM fogs. No problems just had to modify the fog light housing a little.

Also, before a installed the intercooler I was running between 6-8 psi without any problems..
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
Bailhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 1
From: ME
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (99_Ek9)

my first setup was a non-IC t25 on my d16. it was fine at 7psi and I am still running the same motor now at 11-13psi with an IC and bigger turbo 22,000miles later.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
donkiman's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

hmm fog lights over an intercooler? i dunno bout that one. but for real iv seen alota people keep there foglights and run an intercooler. i mean thats exhaust gasses coming from your motor going straight back into your motor without any cooling. dat ***** gonna be pretty hot.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #9  
boostedcivicsir's Avatar
Mr. Badwrench
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,146
Likes: 2
From: stranger in a strange land
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (donkiman)

it all depends on the effeciency of the turbo also. the first gen grand nationals werent intercooled. even the very first turbo trans am's and the turbo regals werent either. they were carbuerated draw through, but thats another issue. the 84-5 Gn's ran well non intercooled. i want to say they were 12 Psi? i cant remember. but for the technology out now, and the prices, it really makes no sense to not intercool your car. http://www.gnttype.org/techare....html has a recipe with added fuel for an 85 gn, they are running 20 psi non intercooled.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
Blanket Jackson's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,532
Likes: 0
From: Nampa, ID, US
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

IMO, not something I would recommend. Yeah, it would be as cooled or chilled air, but it would heat up really fast, right?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #11  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (tjbizzo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tjbizzo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The answer to that question depends on many many factors but the number I most often hear here on H-T is about 6psi. The BIG question is...why would you boost a car without intercooling it??? They're relatively cheap, not too hard to install, and add lots of power and reliability. Why wouldn't someone do it?!?!</TD></TR></TABLE>

. There never really is a true answer. It really comes down to: At what point will you start to detonate at. This is because the hotter air makes it easier to detonate in. Along with leaner combustions/too little timing/etc/etc...
If you run really really rich in boost and then hella timing, low compression, anything...then the higher boost you can run, yet that will make less power. It's all a give and take
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #12  
Scean's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Newnan, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (adseguy)

buy my sidemount

keep ur fogs

keep a sleeper look
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #13  
JDMs1eeper's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,022
Likes: 0
From: tha East Coast
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

I ran 5psi with a SOHC turbo kit non intercooled for a month. Then put a nice FMIC on it. made a night and day differnce. Nonintercooled turbos get heat soaked very easy. If you go non intercooled, order the FMIC asap.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #14  
JDMallTHEway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: FL, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (blackcivic95)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blackcivic95 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">buy my sidemount

keep ur fogs

keep a sleeper look </TD></TR></TABLE>
how much?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
Scean's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Newnan, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

45 shipped
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #16  
.::Lee::.'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: Here in, Texas
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

What you can do to run a FMIC and keep your fog lights is to flip the intercooler upside down so that the inlet and outlet are higher than the side ducts in the bumper where the fogs mounts.

That should solve your problem right there.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #17  
adictionbass's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD, US
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (Ibiza)

a really light coat of black spray paint will keep your sleeper look
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #18  
prelittlelude's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,969
Likes: 6
From: northern DRUNKit, ma
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (JDMallTHEway)

i know a kid that has a really conservative tune on a 5.0 mustang thats running almost 800 whp and is at 26 -28 psi on a vortech custom blower setup, none intercooled or after cooled, he supposedly goes to a very good tunner though, i would say that you can run none intercooled pretty high boost to a limit , but it comes to how good the tune is and how well the internals can take all the heat.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:31 PM
  #19  
Muckman's Avatar
Moderator in Chief
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (prelittlelude)

well the jrsc guys can push 9psi without an intercooler and they prob heat the air up more than a turbo does at 9psi.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 07:36 PM
  #20  
.::Lee::.'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: Here in, Texas
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (Muckman)

I guess the point is if you're were thinking about ditching your intercooler idea just to keep your fogs...don't. There's an easy way around it.

If you want to experiment with pumping hot air into your motor, more power to you!!! Hope you don't live in Phoenix.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #21  
unsungsohc's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (Ibiza)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=369486
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 05:36 AM
  #22  
JDMallTHEway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: FL, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (unsungsohc)

Thanks for all the help guys, it looks like when I go turbo i'm either going to use a tiny front mount, or a side mount intercooler. I'm gald it is possible to keep the foggies though, I like the way they look and my bumper is chopped up so I would have to get a new bumper if I took em out.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 07:18 AM
  #23  
was
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: non-intercooled turbo (Bailhatch)

i have a 2000 civic, and i have the oem foglights aswell, i didnt want to lose them because my bumper would have huge holes in it from where they used to be, so i got a side mount intercooler off an old probe, and mounted it where my A/C radiator thing used to be, works perfect, and im running 8-9psi...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DulinDragons
Forced Induction
3
Apr 21, 2010 06:33 AM
**DOHC HaTcH**
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Mar 15, 2006 07:44 PM
**DOHC HaTcH**
Forced Induction
3
Mar 15, 2006 05:32 PM
H.crx-si
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Apr 13, 2004 01:50 PM
HuskerHybrid
Forced Induction
36
Jul 9, 2003 10:37 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 AM.