new version of uberdata
what wiring info do you have?? if I can remember, everything should match up except the one white wire on the OD0 harness that is seperate from everything else...that one will match with the yellow/green wire on the OBD1 (dizzy side) I'd go double check myself, but its snowing out side right now
yea that sounds about right, im gonna test it out today, i just wish i knew the location of the fatter wire because i cant seem to decipher which wire is fatter.. ill just test it and if its wrong switch them, i just wanted to have it right from the beginning
got all my stuff from JDR.com...goood prices and I got it all pretty quick
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...atmel
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...ors1k
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...54-10
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...-10pf
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...4HCG1
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...atmel
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...ors1k
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...54-10
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...-10pf
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...4HCG1
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA-MAX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">got all my stuff from JDR.com...goood prices and I got it all pretty quick
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...atmel
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...ors1k
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...54-10
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...-10pf
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...4HCG1</TD></TR></TABLE>

thanks for the info.
another question, will this http://www.jdr.com/interact/item.asp?itemno=PLCC28 work as a socket or not? basically, what is the difference between dip and plcc? the reason i ask is because i dont plan on switching chips often and i dont think i need a zif socket. thanks.
*edit*
nevermind. google is my friend.
me. i found what i was looking for here
*update*
will the sockets found here work instead of the zif socket? also, what are the differences between the '28 pin st' and the '28stsk'? thanks.
Modified by ID_ten_T at 9:46 PM 1/28/2004
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...atmel
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...ors1k
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...54-10
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...-10pf
http://www.jdr.com/interact/it...4HCG1</TD></TR></TABLE>

thanks for the info.
another question, will this http://www.jdr.com/interact/item.asp?itemno=PLCC28 work as a socket or not? basically, what is the difference between dip and plcc? the reason i ask is because i dont plan on switching chips often and i dont think i need a zif socket. thanks.
*edit*
nevermind. google is my friend.
me. i found what i was looking for here*update*
will the sockets found here work instead of the zif socket? also, what are the differences between the '28 pin st' and the '28stsk'? thanks.
Modified by ID_ten_T at 9:46 PM 1/28/2004
for the 29C256 chip I'd DEFINENTLY use a ZIF socket, it makes removing the chips 100 times easier cause it just pops right out with the flip of the lever
as for the 74HC, in my ECU the 74HC IC was soldered directly to the board(no socket was used)...nor does it need one. but if you want to mount it on a socket, the one from that link most people use the "solder tail" style so that would be the 28stsk model on that page...
edit: now that I read it it seems the other model might have larger contacts, so either should work I guess
I've got plenty pics if you need any
as for the 74HC, in my ECU the 74HC IC was soldered directly to the board(no socket was used)...nor does it need one. but if you want to mount it on a socket, the one from that link most people use the "solder tail" style so that would be the 28stsk model on that page...
edit: now that I read it it seems the other model might have larger contacts, so either should work I guess
I've got plenty pics if you need any
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA-MAX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for the 29C256 chip I'd DEFINENTLY use a ZIF socket, it makes removing the chips 100 times easier cause it just pops right out with the flip of the lever
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i've actually got an ic puller so that isnt too much of a concern for me, especially since i dont plan on pulling the chip very often. so for my purposes, can i save the $8 and just use the other sockets or is there a problem with the 27c256 chip not fitting? thanks for all your help.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i've actually got an ic puller so that isnt too much of a concern for me, especially since i dont plan on pulling the chip very often. so for my purposes, can i save the $8 and just use the other sockets or is there a problem with the 27c256 chip not fitting? thanks for all your help.
the 27cs are fine, but need a UV eraser to be erased and re-written. most just perfer the 29Cs because they are "overwritable" and don't need a UV eraser...just pop in the burner and re-write
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA-MAX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the 27cs are fine, but need a UV eraser to be erased and re-written. most just perfer the 29Cs because they are "overwritable" and don't need a UV eraser...just pop in the burner and re-write</TD></TR></TABLE>
hmmm... sounds like something to consider. so will these fit in the 28stsk? thanks.
hmmm... sounds like something to consider. so will these fit in the 28stsk? thanks.
cripes just get two or more 29c256's and a ZIF socket and be done with it. 27/29 are both 28pin DIP's.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ID_ten_T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i've actually got an ic puller so that isnt too much of a concern for me, especially since i dont plan on pulling the chip very often. so for my purposes, can i save the $8 and just use the other sockets or is there a problem with the 27c256 chip not fitting? thanks for all your help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
TRUST us, you will.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ID_ten_T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i've actually got an ic puller so that isnt too much of a concern for me, especially since i dont plan on pulling the chip very often. so for my purposes, can i save the $8 and just use the other sockets or is there a problem with the 27c256 chip not fitting? thanks for all your help.</TD></TR></TABLE>
TRUST us, you will.
Wouldn't negative numbers on an ignition map mean after top dead center? What would a '0' be on the ignition map, the stock 16 degrees advance, or 0 degrees advance? Thanks.
Modified by Cyphear at 7:30 AM 2/5/2004
Modified by Cyphear at 7:30 AM 2/5/2004
if anyone wants a FREE kit to chip their ECU for Uberdata, I got this lying around....
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=759000
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=759000
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chpt1onBOOST [DMV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">]hmmm? what are some opinions from people that went from the hack to uberdata? </TD></TR></TABLE>
i need to re-burn my focking chip. The hack was a lot easier b/c i could change things myself. i need to buy a burner, sniffle
i need to re-burn my focking chip. The hack was a lot easier b/c i could change things myself. i need to buy a burner, sniffle
can someone confirm some info for me?
i was wondering if the chips found here will work with uberdata and a socketed ecu.
now i know that most everyone here recommends 29c256, but i plan on using about 5-10 of these with the same tune except with different launch control settings for different track conditions and tire setups and i dont wanna lug around my computer/burner/etc to the track to reburn a chip. lemme know, thanks in advance.
here's a pic
i was wondering if the chips found here will work with uberdata and a socketed ecu.
now i know that most everyone here recommends 29c256, but i plan on using about 5-10 of these with the same tune except with different launch control settings for different track conditions and tire setups and i dont wanna lug around my computer/burner/etc to the track to reburn a chip. lemme know, thanks in advance.
here's a pic
There are reasons why people suggest the 29c256. basically that chip is not reburnable. you must erase it with a UV light and then burn the program back on there. Basically its a pain in the ***. If you dont mind getting a UV eraser or rigging up some sort of UV light it will work. But i bet you can use 10-15 of those chips just getting a decent tune.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ID_ten_T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">can someone confirm some info for me?
i was wondering if the chips found here will work with uberdata and a socketed ecu.
now i know that most everyone here recommends 29c256, but i plan on using about 5-10 of these with the same tune except with different launch control settings for different track conditions and tire setups and i dont wanna lug around my computer/burner/etc to the track to reburn a chip. lemme know, thanks in advance.
here's a pic
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's an OTP SMT chip, worethless.
OTP = burn once and throw away
SMT = surface mount, won't plug into a socket.
i was wondering if the chips found here will work with uberdata and a socketed ecu.
now i know that most everyone here recommends 29c256, but i plan on using about 5-10 of these with the same tune except with different launch control settings for different track conditions and tire setups and i dont wanna lug around my computer/burner/etc to the track to reburn a chip. lemme know, thanks in advance.
here's a pic
That's an OTP SMT chip, worethless.
OTP = burn once and throw away
SMT = surface mount, won't plug into a socket.
you can get the chips from $5-7 each.. times 5 (or whatever amount of chips you want) $35.. stop eating for a week and you'll break even.. maybe make money
Modified by madeiniraq at 12:19 AM 2/12/2004
Modified by madeiniraq at 12:19 AM 2/12/2004


