new dyno numbers
Guest
Posts: n/a
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Olson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What size exhaust wheel does this turbo have? .82 AR housing?</TD></TR></TABLE>
im guessing p-trim? Hope the turbo stays together....
Congrats on the numbers
im guessing p-trim? Hope the turbo stays together....
Congrats on the numbers
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by G"UNIT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who did your catch can?</TD></TR></TABLE>
He built it himself.
He built it himself.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Olson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What size exhaust wheel does this turbo have? .82 AR housing?</TD></TR></TABLE>
it is a p trim in a .82 housing
yeah,i built everything in the car.it has an air box replacing the headlight now as well,i just don't have any new pics
it is a p trim in a .82 housing
yeah,i built everything in the car.it has an air box replacing the headlight now as well,i just don't have any new pics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboTegB18c »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Congrats on the new #'s danny! Race season is just around the corner. Paul</TD></TR></TABLE>
What's that, Paul? Looking for a little payback?
What's that, Paul? Looking for a little payback?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crucian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is it me or is this turbo spooling faster than a T3/T67 H.O.?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
anybody have a dyno chart with one?
</TD></TR></TABLE>anybody have a dyno chart with one?
why only a 10.5 1/4? a guy, Mike Williamson ran a 10.9 in his hatch with 200whp less. Not trying to be a dick, I just thought it would be faster. Clue me in man
Here's mikes vid
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...7.htm
Here's mikes vid
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...7.htm
10.51 was the first time out with the new setup and it was making 672whp. also, the boost would not make less than 30psi, so it was gettin no traction
Yeah, I would imagine 200hp would be a little easier to control. I'm guessing, since I'm not Danny and I don't drive his car, that gaining 500hp in 2000 rpms can be a handful.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by spoolin_teg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why only a 10.5 1/4? a guy, Mike Williamson ran a 10.9 in his hatch with 200whp less. Not trying to be a dick, I just thought it would be faster. Clue me in man
Here's mikes vid
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...7.htm</TD></TR></TABLE>
that was the stage6 turbo gt video
Here's mikes vid
http://videos.streetfire.net/v...7.htm</TD></TR></TABLE>
that was the stage6 turbo gt video
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">10.51 was the first time out with the new setup and it was making 672whp. also, the boost would not make less than 30psi, so it was gettin no traction </TD></TR></TABLE>
you can run 10's with alot less horsepower.700+ is enough for 9's in a light car.
you can run 10's with alot less horsepower.700+ is enough for 9's in a light car.
oh, alright man. I understand. Didnt mean to sound like a ***, I was just curious....So, what are you going to do to get traction in that high of a horsepower car? crazy **** bro
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mykizism
Forced Induction
12
Mar 21, 2007 04:42 PM
Spade
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
21
Feb 14, 2004 04:36 PM




