new dyno numbers
made 735whp and 483lbft torque today.it was blowing out the spark on that run and the miss got worse.not sure what the problem is but it probably would have made another 40hp if it wasn't missing.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Speed Infliction »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">damn, that is a lot of power. what the hell is your setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i'll post it up tonight. i don't have time to type right now
i'll post it up tonight. i don't have time to type right now
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Speed Infliction »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">damn, that is a lot of power. what the hell is your setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>
a quick rundown:
GE sleeved b18c5
crower rods
84mm cp pistons
supertech valvetrain
dsr top mount manifold
turbo specialties t3 t71 turbo
hondata s300
you can im me for more details
a quick rundown:
GE sleeved b18c5
crower rods
84mm cp pistons
supertech valvetrain
dsr top mount manifold
turbo specialties t3 t71 turbo
hondata s300
you can im me for more details
Ah you are finding out now that the CTR cam is working out better than the GSR cams on this newer set up?!
Weren't you the guy who had gained 58whp or so from swapping from 00-01 ITR Cams to GSR cams? That was when you only had a log style mani though right?
If I got the wrong person I do apologize
Edit:Oh yeah sick #s,now go run that bitch and run some 9's !
Weren't you the guy who had gained 58whp or so from swapping from 00-01 ITR Cams to GSR cams? That was when you only had a log style mani though right? If I got the wrong person I do apologize

Edit:Oh yeah sick #s,now go run that bitch and run some 9's !
yeah,that was me.but then i had a shorty manifold and a much smaller turbo that could actually use more mid range power.this turbo has not even started the least little bit where the other one made the gains.
oh yeah, thanks!
oh yeah, thanks!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah,that was me.but then i had a shorty manifold and a much smaller turbo that could actually use more mid range power.this turbo has not even started the least little bit where the other one made the gains.
oh yeah, thanks! </TD></TR></TABLE>
Now I can use this thread to refer people to when I see the 10 posts next week that say ITR/CTR cams VS GSR cams for Turbo!! Which is BEST Threads! lolololol Again it is proven that manifold and turbo size is what determines eventually what cams will work out best
Edit:Oh yeah when I had done my test 3 years back I gained 37whp at 8700rpm and revved to 9500rpm and made a total of 53whp increase BUT I also had a T4/T67 turbo and Full Race ProStreet manifold at that time
oh yeah, thanks! </TD></TR></TABLE>
Now I can use this thread to refer people to when I see the 10 posts next week that say ITR/CTR cams VS GSR cams for Turbo!! Which is BEST Threads! lolololol Again it is proven that manifold and turbo size is what determines eventually what cams will work out best
Edit:Oh yeah when I had done my test 3 years back I gained 37whp at 8700rpm and revved to 9500rpm and made a total of 53whp increase BUT I also had a T4/T67 turbo and Full Race ProStreet manifold at that time
agreed 100%
the only reason i even ever dynoed it with the gsr cams on this setup is that i did not have the money at the time and i wanted to go race.
from what i have seen,the big cams work good at high rpm(the only time a huge turbo is being used) and keep making power up to a higher rpm. the gsr cams make better mid range power and fall off sooner,which works better when the turbo is smaller and comes in sooner
the only reason i even ever dynoed it with the gsr cams on this setup is that i did not have the money at the time and i wanted to go race.
from what i have seen,the big cams work good at high rpm(the only time a huge turbo is being used) and keep making power up to a higher rpm. the gsr cams make better mid range power and fall off sooner,which works better when the turbo is smaller and comes in sooner
ask and ye shall recieve: the chopiness on the new one is due to the ignition breakup
setup with gsr cams:

and same setup with ctr intake cam:
setup with gsr cams:

and same setup with ctr intake cam:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ask and ye shall recieve: the chopiness on the new one is due to the ignition breakup
setup with gsr cams:

and same setup with ctr intake cam:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Looks good, I was looking and wondering why it was falling off at 8500rpm BUT it looks like it gets rich up top, did you guys try leaning it up and reallly revving it?
Are you still using the stock ITR intake manifold?
setup with gsr cams:

and same setup with ctr intake cam:
</TD></TR></TABLE>Looks good, I was looking and wondering why it was falling off at 8500rpm BUT it looks like it gets rich up top, did you guys try leaning it up and reallly revving it?
Are you still using the stock ITR intake manifold?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Synapse Motorsport »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks like the mid-range could use some fuel,but damn that 71 hits hard
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Whoah it does say it is a T3/T71 wow, the hybrid turbos people are making these days
</TD></TR></TABLE>Whoah it does say it is a T3/T71 wow, the hybrid turbos people are making these days
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Whoah it does say it is a T3/T71 wow, the hybrid turbos people are making these days </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah,this turbo started off as an experiment.it is doing pretty good, so i am gonna roll with it for now.toward the end of the year i will probably do something different
Whoah it does say it is a T3/T71 wow, the hybrid turbos people are making these days </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah,this turbo started off as an experiment.it is doing pretty good, so i am gonna roll with it for now.toward the end of the year i will probably do something different
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Looks good, I was looking and wondering why it was falling off at 8500rpm BUT it looks like it gets rich up top, did you guys try leaning it up and really revving it?
Are you still using the stock ITR intake manifold? </TD></TR></TABLE>the ignition was breaking up.the rpm was reading about 500 low.we were revving it to 9500 and were gonna turn it a little more after we got things sorted out. the second pull we made a clean run all the way through at 32psi.it made 717 on that run and the graph was smooth all the way to 9500rpm and still climbing.unfortunately,i did not get a pic of that graph.i must stress that htis was a bad pull,but it was the only printout i got.oh yeah, i am using a edelbrock intake now.
need to take some more pics but
here is a not very current engine pic but not much different :

and a couple of track pics :

Looks good, I was looking and wondering why it was falling off at 8500rpm BUT it looks like it gets rich up top, did you guys try leaning it up and really revving it?
Are you still using the stock ITR intake manifold? </TD></TR></TABLE>the ignition was breaking up.the rpm was reading about 500 low.we were revving it to 9500 and were gonna turn it a little more after we got things sorted out. the second pull we made a clean run all the way through at 32psi.it made 717 on that run and the graph was smooth all the way to 9500rpm and still climbing.unfortunately,i did not get a pic of that graph.i must stress that htis was a bad pull,but it was the only printout i got.oh yeah, i am using a edelbrock intake now.need to take some more pics but
here is a not very current engine pic but not much different :

and a couple of track pics :

i weighed it before the cage and a few other things and it was 2000lbs.only problem was the scale ia was on would not read lower then 2000.it was exactly 2000lbs.before was the other dyno chart-672whp




