Ls SC or Lsvtec SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #1  
xvietxkhmerxboix's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO, USA
Default Ls SC or Lsvtec SC

Hello need some help from you forced industion members, I'm playing on going SC soon so I was wondering should I go Ls SC or Lsvtec SC. What would be more reliable and upgrades should I get any comment will help. I would like to shot for Lsvtec SC but what are your inputs.

Pros And Cons


Modified by xvietxkhmerxboix at 7:18 AM 12/12/2003
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
DaveF's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 16,905
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
Default Re: Ls SC or Lsvtec SC (xvietxkhmerxboix)

go ls/vtec, and ditch the SC. go nos or turbo..supercharged hondas are worthless imo.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 10:10 PM
  #3  
Disco Stu's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: WA, USA
Default Re: Ls SC or Lsvtec SC (xvietxkhmerxboix)

Niether, you should go turbo. But seriously, no hate, but what are you reasons for wanting to go supercharged?
An LsVtec is going to be better simply because any vtec head is going to out flow the stock ls head. Especially since on SC applications, boost levels are usually lower, so cranking up the boost and letting the turbo make up the extra power (on a straight ls compared to lsvtec) isn't as realistic of an option.
Basically, SC's run lower boost (average kits come with between 6-12 psi pulleys) so to make more power, you'll need the extra flow somehow, and this is where the vtec head would come in. Now, if you went turbo (come on, I had to ) You could save some money and run a straight LS motor, (although, once again, an lsvtec would be better) and crank up the boost a bit more in order to reach the same levels as any lsvtec sc motor would make. If it's lag you are trying to avoid, you could always run a straight ls motor with the lower redline, (as opposed to a vtec motor) and run a decent sized T3 that'll still give you quick spool and pull till redline. Sorry for being so longwinded! I hope it made some sense, and I'm sure someone will come on here and correct me. Good luck and let us know what you decide!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #4  
xvietxkhmerxboix's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO, USA
Default Re: Ls SC or Lsvtec SC (Disco Stu)

bumpo
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
BROOD's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 1
From: North/West, IL
Default Re: Ls SC or Lsvtec SC (xvietxkhmerxboix)

As long as your willing to build it up from the beginning I'd suggest LSVT, heck I'm biased anyways. The cylinder head is well worth the extra efforts to make it work.

I also agree that I would choose turbo over SC, but doing your own thing is cool too. I would probably not touch a JRSC unless it was intercooled and prepared for large boost numbers.
With the SC route I would be more worried about inlet air temps over how well the cyl head flows. High inlet temps will kill performance on both a good flowing cyl head and a poor flowing cyl head.

Good luck with your project
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #6  
rocket256's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Racer Ave., Ga., US
Default Re: Ls SC or Lsvtec SC (xvietxkhmerxboix)

Ok! SC
turbo
why? b/c this <U> https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=697284 </U>
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EGgarniEG
Acura Integra
27
Apr 22, 2008 04:43 PM
Rooftop voter
Forced Induction
2
Jan 16, 2008 04:51 AM
00IntegraLSO-town
Acura Integra
3
Feb 13, 2006 04:52 PM
mvbadboy
Tech / Misc
2
May 6, 2003 07:30 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15 PM.