Notices

Intercooler PIPING SIZE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2006, 06:45 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
boostdummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Intercooler PIPING SIZE

First off, I did search and there really is not a clear answer or dyno #'s to show what works with what power levels. So I thought I would try and get some feed back

I was wondering what Size HOT SIDE intercooler piping you guys recondmend for a 2.0L Motor running a T3/T04e 57 Trim @20+PSI I will be aiming for 350WHP.

I Have 2.5" on the cold side just wondering whats the best tot use on HOT SIDE 2.5" or 2"?

Thanks

Old 01-12-2006, 09:44 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Boosted Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2.5" will go you more turbo lag.
2" can do your 350whp.
DSM guys run 2" on the hotside and push over 300whp.
Old 01-12-2006, 09:51 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
bdavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brighton, Mi
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Boosted Power)

honestly man, you will not be able to tell the difference. do whatever is easiest
Old 01-12-2006, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Very Emergency!!
 
emotionisdead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ....Things Just Getting Good..... Reno, NV
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Intercooler PIPING SIZE (boostdummy)

i just have a stock b16 on 10psi, but i run all 2.5in excpet for a little foot long section of 2" right after the turbine outlet. i used to run all 2.5in but my traction bars and new downpipe made have to use that 2" section. i didn't notice a difference.
Old 01-12-2006, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Member
 
beepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pearl City, HI, USA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Intercooler PIPING SIZE (boostdummy)

Quick math:

2.0 liters / 2 = 1 liter/revolution x 8500 RPM / 60 = 142 liters per second

142 liters x 61 = 8645 CI/second / CSA (2"/2)^2*pi / 12 = 229.31 feet/second.

229.31 feet/second / speed of sound (1185 ft/s for air at 2.5 atm and 120°F)

= Mach 0.19

Therefore the air is incompressible, therefore pipe losses are primarily determined by frictional wall losses, therefore 2" pipe is plenty for your goals.

Interestingly enough, the amount of boost has very little to do with how large of a pipe you need. The two primary factors are RPM and displacement. However, if you have an intake pre-turbo, you must recalculate the mach number based on mass flow at 1 atm. In this case, a 2" intake pipe pre-turbo would undergo velocities of Mach 0.46, which will have significant pipe losses. 3" pipe pre-turbo, however, will drop the Mach number to 0.20, for negligible pipe losses.

The numbers don't lie, but I still think a 3" intake pipe and 2" charge pipes would look funny.

Old 01-13-2006, 06:34 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
boostdummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Intercooler PIPING SIZE (boostdummy)

thanks anyone else care to share an opinion?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RattyTuned
Forced Induction
35
02-02-2018 01:13 PM
jbell
Forced Induction
4
11-15-2008 12:54 PM
Speed Infliction
Forced Induction
5
07-23-2006 11:13 AM
jonnybravo
Forced Induction
6
11-19-2003 11:49 AM
R6Boy69
Forced Induction
11
06-21-2001 09:42 AM



Quick Reply: Intercooler PIPING SIZE



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 AM.