I need some advise on my motor
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I need some advise on my motor
Ok, here's the thing. I got ahold of a GSR with
Eagle rods w/ ARP rod bolts
Arias 9:1 pistons (81mm)
skunk2 cam gears
arp head studs
skunk2 springs and retainers
LS crank
I was thinking about just having the motors sleeved and re-ringed....or should I go for a bigger size piston and bore. I plan on boosting this motor and hope for 600whp or somewhere around that territory .
I would like some opinions, Please.
Eagle rods w/ ARP rod bolts
Arias 9:1 pistons (81mm)
skunk2 cam gears
arp head studs
skunk2 springs and retainers
LS crank
I was thinking about just having the motors sleeved and re-ringed....or should I go for a bigger size piston and bore. I plan on boosting this motor and hope for 600whp or somewhere around that territory .
I would like some opinions, Please.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Centerville, Utah, USA
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sleeves and a stock bore will work just great. Haven't really seen a big improvement in horse comparing the 81mm vs an 84mm bore. they both can put down great numbers. the 81mm will also leave you more room to bore in case something happens to go wrong. You won't be screw out of a brand new set of sleeves.
#4
476 whp / 323 tq @ 17 PSI
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BLKTeg94)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLKTeg94 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sleeves and a stock bore will work just great. Haven't really seen a big improvement in horse comparing the 81mm vs an 84mm bore. they both can put down great numbers. the 81mm will also leave you more room to bore in case something happens to go wrong. You won't be screw out of a brand new set of sleeves.</TD></TR></TABLE>
from 81 to 84, you'll pick up some torque but not any real noticeable horsepower
from 81 to 84, you'll pick up some torque but not any real noticeable horsepower
#6
Re: (BLKTeg94)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLKTeg94 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sleeves and a stock bore will work just great. Haven't really seen a big improvement in horse comparing the 81mm vs an 84mm bore. they both can put down great numbers. the 81mm will also leave you more room to bore in case something happens to go wrong. You won't be screw out of a brand new set of sleeves.</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://forums.evans-tuning.com...=2088
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">200cc increase in displacement usually yields about 20-25 ft-lbs of torque.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All in all it does show that its worth to go 84mm bore when sleeving and building a block.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I went 83mm with my build. If you're going to do enough damage to hurt more than 1mm of the cylinder walls (so that this would need to be bored past 84mm) you're probably going to have a rod sticking through part of your block, and I'm not concerned with the sleeves at that point, but it is worth it to go bigger bore if you are sleeving.
http://forums.evans-tuning.com...=2088
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">200cc increase in displacement usually yields about 20-25 ft-lbs of torque.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted hybrid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All in all it does show that its worth to go 84mm bore when sleeving and building a block.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I went 83mm with my build. If you're going to do enough damage to hurt more than 1mm of the cylinder walls (so that this would need to be bored past 84mm) you're probably going to have a rod sticking through part of your block, and I'm not concerned with the sleeves at that point, but it is worth it to go bigger bore if you are sleeving.
#7
Re: (Dturbocivic)
81.5 is good as is 84.5. 81 can make 600+ and 84 can make it too. torque production will prolly be better with the bigger engine but head work comes into play too. the head should be adressed in any build though. goodluck
Trending Topics
#9
476 whp / 323 tq @ 17 PSI
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (red_crx)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by red_crx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thanks guys....so the bigger bore will yield more tq, but even if i keep the stock bore it can still achieve 600hp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yup
yup
#13
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: (BLKTeg94)
you dont really have to get the head cc'd to fit the 84mm bore, but it does help.
what he means by that is the combustion chamber is 81mm in diameter. they open up the combustion chamber diameter to fit the bore
what he means by that is the combustion chamber is 81mm in diameter. they open up the combustion chamber diameter to fit the bore
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrodri1018
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
4
11-21-2017 08:08 PM