H & I beam rod differences
Hbeams are usually heavier, from what I've seen.
Pauter makes one of the stronger rods and looks like it would be one of the lighter ones. Design is neither H or I type beam.
Pauter makes one of the stronger rods and looks like it would be one of the lighter ones. Design is neither H or I type beam.
There's just more material on a H-beam rod vs an I-beam rod, and this is why they weight more. So I would assume the H-beam would be stronger if the materials are the same, say 4340 Steel....
true, i wouild tihnk that taking off material would effect the integrity of the rod.
unless one rod was h beam e4340 and one was I beam titanium then maybe the titanium would be stronger even tho its a I beam?
But then again that would be comparing the integtites of the metals and not the rod itsself.
if both rods were titanium one was i and one was H, you would still get the ''well the h beam has more material so it must be stronger'' even tho both are from the same strong materials. the integrity might be greater with more material, and even greater if the rod is well balanced with more material.. thats just my theory
unless one rod was h beam e4340 and one was I beam titanium then maybe the titanium would be stronger even tho its a I beam?
But then again that would be comparing the integtites of the metals and not the rod itsself.
if both rods were titanium one was i and one was H, you would still get the ''well the h beam has more material so it must be stronger'' even tho both are from the same strong materials. the integrity might be greater with more material, and even greater if the rod is well balanced with more material.. thats just my theory
Trending Topics
I-beam's are actually the stronger rod.. thus if both are made of the same materials and such..
you have to think about which area of the rod is receiving the most stress from each stroke.. its is not the front or back of the rod that takes the force.. its each side.. compare their designs
H < picture this as looking straight down on a rod cut in half.. notice that the force is only being displaced though 2 thin bars of material
like so:

notice how all the stress force is located across the 2 thin strips of steel
now look at an I beam.. in which the stress force is located over a much broader area
like so:

although don't get my wrong H-beams are very strong indeed..
but if you want to get technical about which one would be stronger/displace stress and combustion force better and more efficiently.. the I-beam would take the cake
you have to think about which area of the rod is receiving the most stress from each stroke.. its is not the front or back of the rod that takes the force.. its each side.. compare their designs
H < picture this as looking straight down on a rod cut in half.. notice that the force is only being displaced though 2 thin bars of material
like so:

notice how all the stress force is located across the 2 thin strips of steel
now look at an I beam.. in which the stress force is located over a much broader area
like so:

although don't get my wrong H-beams are very strong indeed..
but if you want to get technical about which one would be stronger/displace stress and combustion force better and more efficiently.. the I-beam would take the cake
Thats what I was thinking. I mean, think even of commercial building construction. Those huge pieces of steel are all I beam construction. And I dont even want to know how much titanium rods would cost!
on an eagle box it has a check mark for I beam or H beam but i never even seen ANY I beam eagle rods?
pauters are "X" beam or whatever.
pauters are "X" beam or whatever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d16dcoe45
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
Nov 15, 2005 05:02 PM





