Notices

GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2005, 08:55 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
2LiterTurboSeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smyrna, Tn, United States
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp?

I've come around to getting rid of my turbo setup I had intended to run on my Se-R and I'm looking to buy a bunch of new parts, including a new turbo. SR20Forum isn't much help when it comes to specific turbo information so I figured I would ask here.

How big is a difference between a GT35R and a t3/t67 with comparable specs? I've noticed a lot of people run the t3/t67 and make 400+, while most people I see with the GT35R are running in excess of 500 or more. Any reason for this?

I'd like to purchase either of these for my next setup, I just don't know how to read compressor maps or anything like that to compare. Someone shine some light on this for me
Old 10-16-2005, 10:13 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
DRIVENRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

either will reach your power goal.... 35r is the **** though
Old 10-16-2005, 10:20 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
flip1199's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sacramento, ca, usa
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (adSPEED)

gt30r
Old 10-16-2005, 10:42 PM
  #4  
 
boostpowered_b18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: northwest, fl, United States
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (flip1199)

gt35r
Old 10-16-2005, 10:54 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
turbo*s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA, US
Posts: 4,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (2LiterTurboSeR)

If you can afford the gt35r go with that one... It is a bad *** turbo. I use to run the t3/t67 and it's a really good turbo aswell, but once you go ball bearing you won't go back.

I've seen dyno charts of both on almost identical setups. The torque curve, and hp are pratically the same up to a certain point. The gt35r just made the power sooner. Alot of people say that the spool is only like 700-800 sooner, but when you factor in the fact that it also makes 100 or so hp sooner. That's a big deal in my opinion.

Just my .02 cents. Good luck with your build.
Old 10-16-2005, 11:25 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
White_EK49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Valley, ca, usa
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (TurboChrgd_Civic)

I go with GT35R for the simple fact that it's fuggin nice and the exceptional efficient turbo it is. 10 second turbo.
Old 10-16-2005, 11:26 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
RyanAutry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (flip1199)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by flip1199 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">gt30r</TD></TR></TABLE>

No doubt!
Old 10-17-2005, 05:28 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
.nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Overkill...
Old 10-17-2005, 06:28 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
m R g S r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC bitchessss
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (2LiterTurboSeR)

for only 400....30r is best

or just max out a gt3037 or something
Old 10-17-2005, 08:01 AM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Soccerking3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Catching Rivers on Fire TWICE
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (m R g S r)

the gt2871 is also rated to 400hp, but that would be maxing it out and might be pushing hot air at that point, but i bet the spool time would be amazing
Old 10-17-2005, 08:13 AM
  #11  
B*A*N*N*E*D
 
PeakBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (TurboChrgd_Civic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboChrgd_Civic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you can afford the gt35r go with that one... It is a bad *** turbo. I use to run the t3/t67 and it's a really good turbo aswell, but once you go ball bearing you won't go back.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

we now have a ballbearing t3/to4R (t67)


for a street car with a 400whp goal, i would recommend looking into the gt3040R.
the GT3040R uses the gt30 turbine wheel mated to the 61mmGT35R compressor wheel.
the smaller turbine wheel will allow for much better reponse.

hth
Old 10-17-2005, 09:32 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
T.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Greenville, SC, US
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (adSPEED)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by adSPEED &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">either will reach your power goal.... 35r is the **** though </TD></TR></TABLE>

yes it is
Old 10-17-2005, 09:38 AM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
alpha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (2LiterTurboSeR)

The GT3076R or GT3071R is your best bet.
Old 10-17-2005, 10:00 AM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Marlon88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malta, Europe, BBG02
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (2LiterTurboSeR)

For a 400whp goal I think they are both too big , you should consider smaller turbos.

Here are some threads about the T3/T67 vs GT35R .

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1124670
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1046654

The conclusion after reading these threads are this . If you want to build a top end motor that could rev 9000+ rpms I could go with the T3/T67 , If you are building a setup to enjoy on the street and race in the weekends I could go with the GT35R since the powerband starts at lower revs.

Good Luck
Old 10-17-2005, 11:24 AM
  #15  
Mr. Badwrench
 
boostedcivicsir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: stranger in a strange land
Posts: 14,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (TurboChrgd_Civic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboChrgd_Civic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you can afford the gt35r go with that one... It is a bad *** turbo. I use to run the t3/t67 and it's a really good turbo aswell, but once you go ball bearing you won't go back.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

i am an exception to that rule.
i had a t04b ball bearing, and went with a t3t67 h.o. but either turbo will get you to your goal.


Modified by boostedcivicsir at 8:41 PM 10/17/2005
Old 10-17-2005, 11:26 AM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FULL RACE, AZ, USA
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp? (2LiterTurboSeR)



100% stock SR20 with stock cams, just our stage 3 kit (t3/t67) and intake mani change.

if you have any questions feel free to ask. we have a lot of sr20 experience.


Modified by Full-Race Geoff at 11:58 AM 10/18/2005
Old 10-17-2005, 12:55 PM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
D@nnY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: miami, fla, us
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sc34 .63 exhaust housing
Old 10-17-2005, 04:28 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
zeroz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (D@nnY)

i have GT30R and GT35R for sale if interested

from garrett specs
GT30R will support 520 hp. GT35R will support 620hp. this is probably HP from the crank not the wheels
Old 10-18-2005, 03:50 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
D@nnY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: miami, fla, us
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (zeroz)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zeroz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have GT30R and GT35R for sale if interested

from garrett specs
GT30R will support 520 hp. GT35R will support 620hp. this is probably HP from the crank not the wheels</TD></TR></TABLE>

they are rated by the compressors and its not a tthe wheels but those numbers arent accurate..i did 654 on a t3 35r
Old 10-18-2005, 04:53 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
ttaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CARSON, CA, US
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (D@nnY)

i have GT30R and GT35R for sale if interested

How much????
Old 10-18-2005, 05:22 PM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
alpha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (ttaco)

Just get a GT42R.
Old 10-18-2005, 05:53 PM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
h22 civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORIGINAL H22 GANGSTA
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (0x64)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 0x64 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just get a GT42R.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Old 10-18-2005, 08:22 PM
  #23  
cuin9sec
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

question is how much money do you want to spend???
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
96romaEK
Forced Induction
7
05-11-2010 08:01 PM
turbosol_16
Forced Induction
1
12-27-2006 06:41 AM
wpgcivic
Forced Induction
15
07-18-2004 09:24 PM
Se-rv-Tak
Forced Induction
15
09-24-2003 02:54 AM
hybrid901
Forced Induction
34
02-19-2003 05:38 PM



Quick Reply: GT35R v. T3/T67, which better for 400 whp?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 PM.