Built GSR back from the dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #1  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Built GSR back from the dyno

Ok <U>first</U> let me start with the setup -

B18C1 bore 20 over
CP 9:1 pistons
Eagle H beam rods, ARP bolts
T3/T04E ~ 57 Trim Garrett Turbo (50/63 A/R) T3/T4
Revhard manifold with Swaintech coating
Tial wastegate 10psi
Greddy Type S BOV
Modine IC
3" custom DP with 3" exhaust (Kteller) 3'' flex, and 3'' magnaflow
Walbro 255 pump
450 blue tops
uberdata tuned
3bar MAP

<U>Next</U>, the dyno graph -



I cant say that I am disappointed with the results. Because I had no idea what to expect.

<U>First Question</U>
1.Now the a/f ratio was in the 13's-14:1 BEFORE vtec. After vtec it calmed down and we got a 12.2~ish all the way to redline. Ben (Snail Tuning here on h-t, my tuner) has tried to get a better ratio before vtec but to no luck. Any ideas?
2. What should my timing be set at? Right now it sits at .8 degrees retard per 1lb. of boost.
3. Are these numbers to be expected for my setup at 10lbs. of boost?
4. Any other pointers would be great... please no flamming

Thanks goes to Snail Tuning and Back Street Performance for getting me on the dyno in less then a days time

http://www.backstreetper.com/



Modified by VTECisSeXY at 8:46 PM 3/9/2005
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #2  
AzntaggeR's Avatar
TSPeed Factory
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA, Vietnam
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

seems kinda low to me. that setup has potential to break 300 hp on that much boost.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #3  
AzntaggeR's Avatar
TSPeed Factory
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA, Vietnam
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (AzntaggeR)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1164841

^^this guy broke 300 with a pretty similar setup to yours except it was done on a stock gsr block. i plan on breaking 300 hp as well on 10 or 11 psi with my stock gsr. just an idea of how much you should be shooting for.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (AzntaggeR)

yea i agree it seems kinda low.. but that guy ran stock compression
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #5  
93turbo16's Avatar
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 3
From: Carlisle, Pa, USA
Default

ignition problem. See how jaggy the lines are.. might want to start replacing stuff.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #6  
turboEGhatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: work
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VTECisSeXY &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea i agree it seems kinda low.. but that guy ran stock compression </TD></TR></TABLE>

rofl, you see boosted-hybrid's comparison? Difference in power was like 10 WHP under boost from 10:1 to 9:1. Doesn't make much of a difference at all.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #7  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (turboEGhatch)

ahh shoulda read more
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #8  
wong's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Chinese Domestic Market
Default Re: (93turbo16)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93turbo16 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ignition problem. See how jaggy the lines are.. might want to start replacing stuff.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Seems that way
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #9  
Evanmb44's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
From: Dekalb, IL
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

i would definately say you should be in the 300's easily with built block and 10psi.

i am shooting for 280 on my ls at 10psi w/ stock internals....we shall see

i would expect bigger numbers
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #10  
adseguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Default Re: (93turbo16)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93turbo16 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ignition problem. See how jaggy the lines are.. might want to start replacing stuff.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Disagree...I think it had no smoothening enabled...if it did have jagged lines it would only be in the higher RPMS....those numbers are low for 10PSI on a 9:1 witha 57 trim. Hmm....might want to talk to your tunner or post up your map. Also have you done a compression check....just throwing out ideas&gt;?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #11  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: (adseguy)

Ben (snail tuning) will be online a little later.. just called him
He has the map
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #12  
SOHC_MShue's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,440
Likes: 2
From: Richmond, Va, usa
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

yea those numbers are weak. I agree with the ignition problem.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #13  
Sohc Driver's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,408
Likes: 2
From: McKinney, TX, USA
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (SOHC_MShue)

I vouch for those numbers to be very weak for a GSR. I made 259whp @ 211wtq on a bone stock LS at 10psi.. I wish I knew what was wrong...Good luck on that

Khoi
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (Sohc Driver)

thanks for the input guys

Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #15  
RA166E's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: WA, USA
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

I would also like to see the fuel and ign maps. Something is up?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
tony n.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

kinda low with a built gsr..
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #17  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 242
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default

Unfortunately I have to agree. That is VERY low for Built GS-R, and main timing should be adjusted by your software, not an overall base from your distributor or a BTM....

That should be about 280-300 on stock compression stock block..

Something else is up..
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #18  
VTC_CiViC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,613
Likes: 1
From: Naples, Fl, USA
Default Re: (TheShodan)

Aside from the obvious A/F issues, was the timing tweaked at all on the dyno?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #19  
15psi of fun's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: KC MO, MO, US
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (boosted2cam)

on 10psi i made 320hp and 255tq i have 84.5 mm bore
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
Thread Starter
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (15psi of fun)

o my the pics













Last two are the 2d highs and lows. The rest of them can be identified by the tab that is highlighted.

thanks ben
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #21  
Snail Tuning's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Wooster, Ohio, usa
Default Re: (VTC_ohgodnotagain_CiViC)

i sent him some pictures.

as for the a/f problems. no idea why they are off as bad as they were. i mean 2-3 months ago when we tuned, the car was in perfect a/f ratio. at 3grand it would go from 13.0down to 12 at 4psi, and hold at 12-12.2 from 4k-8k, not its kindove scrambled, and to lean it was running upwards of 12.5-12.7 on the dyno.

But even with it lean it should have had higher numbers.

I have had no experiance with adjusting timing, and i have read keeping it close to 16degrees seems to work good, and keep detonation low. so thats about what the setup was running at. this was my 2nd time on a dyno, and first time able to make any changes, or see how things played out. we weren;t on the dyno much, maybe an hr tops, because we just wanted to see what numbers this would put out. not really a tuning session. whenever it warms up, im ganna straiten out the a/f curve again. any pointers would be great. and if there is something noticably wronge with the tune, please don't flame, just help us out. im new to this.



the timing was retarded alittle more when we first got there, and i added 2% back from 4200RPM 9lbs of boost up to 8000rpm and highest boost possible. that gained 20 whp in some areas, but without any way to detect nock, we didn;t want to add anymore.


Modified by Snail Tuning at 10:31 PM 3/9/2005
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #22  
93turbo16's Avatar
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 3
From: Carlisle, Pa, USA
Default Re: (Snail Tuning)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by adseguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Disagree...I think it had no smoothening enabled...if it did have jagged lines it would only be in the higher RPMS....those numbers are low for 10PSI on a 9:1 witha 57 trim. Hmm....might want to talk to your tunner or post up your map. Also have you done a compression check....just throwing out ideas&gt;? </TD></TR></TABLE>

I do think that the graph didn't have smootherning enabled, but that is true of igniton problems. The graph will get jagged, I just played around with a car that did the same thing and had a bad coil. If you took too much timing out the lines would get jagged. I am still betting something with ignition.

As far as the tuning goes,( I didn't notice the scalars.. it does look like you have a good bit of timing up there, I would knock it down a few degrees and go from there. Also that ignition map isn't a stock GSR last time I checked, at 10 lbs, with .8 retard you should be a whole lot lower than what it is now. I would make a new map, and copy paste them, and see it that helps. Are you positive about the actually timing at the dizzy? And, the same with plug gap and plugs.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #23  
D-tuned's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: skeet skeet
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (VTECisSeXY)

IMO I think you have too much timing for 10 psi. I've tuned a few cars and I normally end up with about 20-22 degrees(on pump gas). that excess timing could be why your dyno looks so choppy. just my .02
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #24  
jason190's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND, NY
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (2000civicsi)

Those numbers do seems low.....My built SOHC non vtec is putting down about 245 to the wheels on 10psi with a street tune. But I'm also running like 11.5:1 af/r. I would look into it a little more.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 08:19 PM
  #25  
ScottEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
From: Hiboosta, IL, USA
Default Re: Built GSR back from the dyno (jason190)

You're running as much total timing as I was on 100 oct, on a B16A setup.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 PM.