Another HP prediction Q...
I know these topics get old fast but I'm too damn anxious to get my Hondata installed and tuned (looks like it won't be untill the middle/end of next week) So I'm just curious if the HP and tqe #'s in my head are attainable...
My Setup:
Car: 2001 ITR
Motor: b18C5
-9.0 to 1 Arias Pistons on stock rods
-inlinepro blockguard
-Stock head and IM
Turbo setup:
I want to tune it for atleast 16psi hopefully.
-Rev Hard manifold
-Tial WG
-Turbonetics 60-1 HIFI turbo
-2.5" mandrel DP, w/ 3" test pipe and 3" mandrel Cat-back
-Spearco FMIC
-2.5" mandrel bent IC and charge piping
-Joe P MBC
-Fully tuned Hondata w/ 72lb hour injectors, 3 bar map etc...
Thanks for any predictions...I'll get dyno charts ETC. posted as soon as possible.
Mark
Random pics of my setup:
My Setup:
Car: 2001 ITR
Motor: b18C5
-9.0 to 1 Arias Pistons on stock rods
-inlinepro blockguard
-Stock head and IM
Turbo setup:
I want to tune it for atleast 16psi hopefully.
-Rev Hard manifold
-Tial WG
-Turbonetics 60-1 HIFI turbo
-2.5" mandrel DP, w/ 3" test pipe and 3" mandrel Cat-back
-Spearco FMIC
-2.5" mandrel bent IC and charge piping
-Joe P MBC
-Fully tuned Hondata w/ 72lb hour injectors, 3 bar map etc...
Thanks for any predictions...I'll get dyno charts ETC. posted as soon as possible.
Mark
Random pics of my setup:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quick 200k Mile Motor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'll go ahead and predict the setup with 81.5mm bore, @ 16psi, with the head <u>untouched</u>:
331whp @ 8k
218ft-lbs @ 6.2k </TD></TR></TABLE>
331whp @ 8k
218ft-lbs @ 6.2k </TD></TR></TABLE>
id keep it at 81.5mm. someoen just made 647whp with 81.5whp, the extra block thickness is worth it imho.
It depends on your IC ... i dont know hiw big that one is but it looks like its gonna be a restriction, i think you should be able to make 400whp if the IC and fuel system support it.
It depends on your IC ... i dont know hiw big that one is but it looks like its gonna be a restriction, i think you should be able to make 400whp if the IC and fuel system support it.
Trending Topics
You're not gonna make 647whp on stock sleeves, and you're not gonna crack a good sleeve even if it's bored to 84mm so why not go big bore. Bigger bore makes power, torque, and spools up a turbo quicker. I must be missing the downside?
I agree, why not go bigger? Is there some downside other than money? Like the old saying says "there is no replacement for displacement". yea, yea, I don't need to hear that more boost will make up for displacement...1.8 with same **** as 2.0...In the end who comes out on top?
Bigger bore makes power, torque, and spools up a turbo quicker. End of story.
Bigger bore makes power, torque, and spools up a turbo quicker. End of story.
the only downside I see to a 84mm bore is margin for error. if something ***** up new sleeves. if you stick to a 82 or 83mm bore you can have a problem then get it bore to larger pistons and you are on the road again with out haveing to install new sleeves again. isnt this true???
Thanks a lot for all the info. The intercooler should not be a restriction at all. It's a Spearco core, 18.5x7x3.5" and has 2.5" inlet and outlets w/ 2.5" manrel bent intercooler and charge piping.
I'm hoping to make atleast 380whp and any torque above 250 would work for me...We'll know the #'s hopefully this coming weekend.
Thanks.
Mark
I'm hoping to make atleast 380whp and any torque above 250 would work for me...We'll know the #'s hopefully this coming weekend.
Thanks.
Mark
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dd69ma
Forced Induction
11
Sep 25, 2006 11:59 AM
chihuahuamanx
Forced Induction
76
Apr 19, 2005 08:14 AM



