100 octane sohc turbo
03-29-2005, 08:18 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 100 octane sohc turbo (flip1199)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by flip1199 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how many lbs are u running now? and what do u plan to up it to?</TD></TR></TABLE>
with 93 i was gunna run 10psi, what could i run with the 100
with 93 i was gunna run 10psi, what could i run with the 100
03-29-2005, 08:28 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 100 octane sohc turbo (Tapen00n)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tapen00n »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">with 93 i was gunna run 10psi, what could i run with the 100</TD></TR></TABLE> Relative to your internals and your tuning.
Trending Topics
03-30-2005, 06:24 PM
#10
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: work
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 100 octane sohc turbo (Tapen00n)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tapen00n »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cp std bore low comp. pistons and stock rods</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why in the sweet name of jesus would you tear the motor down, but skimp out 300 bucks for a set of rods that are 10 times stronger than your stockers?
Why in the sweet name of jesus would you tear the motor down, but skimp out 300 bucks for a set of rods that are 10 times stronger than your stockers?
03-30-2005, 06:35 PM
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: colorado springs, colorado, USA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I been running 10psi for 2 years and still running 10psi now with stock d internals. I dont know why people are so scared of 10psi.. 8-10psi is solid for 93
03-30-2005, 06:59 PM
#12
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: work
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (PK SPEED)
It's not "being scared" of running that much boost, it's why the heck would you go to the extent of completely tearing the motor down and rebuilding it, but not saving up for an extra week and getting some decent rods to replace the stockers. That's like recruiting Maurice Green, Michael Johnson, and Tim Montgomery for a 4 x 100M relay team, then throwing George Foreman in there to run anchor, and tell em to have at er. If you're gonna go as far as to build your motor, why not remove the one main weak link from it.
03-30-2005, 08:08 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where N/A is Not Applicable
Posts: 4,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (turboEGhatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turboEGhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's not "being scared" of running that much boost, it's why the heck would you go to the extent of completely tearing the motor down and rebuilding it, but not saving up for an extra week and getting some decent rods to replace the stockers. That's like recruiting Maurice Green, Michael Johnson, and Tim Montgomery for a 4 x 100M relay team, then throwing George Foreman in there to run anchor, and tell em to have at er. If you're gonna go as far as to build your motor, why not remove the one main weak link from it.</TD></TR></TABLE> LOL yeah the rods are still the weakest link so upto about 250whp is all you would really want to go unless you want to break your rods. You haven't listed your compression ratio or turbo size... I ran 16psi on similar fuel with standard comp. Its hp or detonation that will break the rods though . 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
